New 20 ounce tumblers available now! Forum donation credit with purchase. https://www.wildguzzi.com/Products/products.htm#Tumbler
I'll look at the swingarm races in the daylight today, but I thought there was no room behind them to get puller jaws? (that would be a bad design).
The pinion splines appear to be trashed. Drive shaft might have some life left. Is the a ridge in the middle of the coupler bore?
Yes, there is a ridge at the mid-point of the coupler, I wasn't sure if it was a machined feature or not. Driveshaft splines look almost perfect to my naked eye, why the "might" in your assessment?Jacksonracingcomau brings up the point about rear drive flange/carrier bearing centerline being out of tolerance (should be theoretical perfect 90 deg?), is this the effect of that? The pinion splines wear, but NOT the driveshaft splines? I would think a mis-alignment would distribute wear evenly between the 2 (assuming the same material and temper)?
Jacksonracing, can you please explain how a "shade tree mechanic" can check the swing arm flange for trueness,Including what tools are needed?
Make mandrel to mount in uj bearing, we used a broken uj with solid bar mounted in it, dial gauge at end. Mill flange square with zero runout.Mine was .100" out, now trueWhen square you can weld coupling to pinion, will now get rest of life out of pinion
True that! I'm pretty clear on what the issue is Jackson is trying to investigate, but I, too can't get a mental image of how to set up a dial guage to measure.To beat a dead horse more thoroughly: Yes, mine is a 1-piece UJ/shaft, with splines on the female end of the UJ at the front, and male splines on the aft end. If the load is all at the rear end as Jackson opines, the load at the shaft/coupling HAS to equal the load at the coupling/pinion interface, simple physics. I guess it doesn't matter WHY the driveshaft/coupling didn't wear, it just bugs me, but I should be happy the shaft is OK.Wait......I know why.....the aft end of the shaft is ~7 inches from it's "fixed" carrier bearing support, and with whatever tolerance there is at that interface, it allows the aft end to "float", and drive the mis-alignment into the pinion, which has virtually zero "float" capability, as long as the pinion bearings are still tight. That's my theory, anyway.Back to Jackson's suggested fix:I find it VERY hard to believe there was a tenth of an inch runout at the pinion compared to the carrier centerline, but I'm not disputing there WAS/IS significant runout. But milling the flange of the swingarm such a specialized amount is WAAAAAY beyond my ability to even convey to a machine shop, even if I WAS able to measure and quantify the mis-alignment.I am stumped right now on how to proceed. Ultimately, the failure mode looks like completely stripped pinion splines if I were to ride it as-is, but I'd bet I could prolong that many years at my present pace if I replace the coupler to reduce the slop by 50% at that interface. I know that will make most of the mechanical purists cringe.
... one side against other ie pissed as rat
I can't find the couplers no-wheres, I called Harper's and he/they said they were scrounging for a different customer for one and couldn't find any.
How much do you want to spend?https://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_from=R40&_trksid=m570.l1313&_nkw=18327700&_sacat=6000
A guy in WA welded a 5-speed coupler to his stripped convert splines to do the same thing.