New 20 ounce tumblers available now! Forum donation credit with purchase. https://www.wildguzzi.com/Products/products.htm#Tumbler
Never owned a BSA or JAWA but always liked them both. We'll see what they come up with.
It'll be some built-to-a-price Indian thing that has nothing to do with BSA or Jawa, just uses the badges and name.Kind of like naming a mediocre ball player George Herman Ruth and touting him as "Babe Ruth is BACK!!"If they still sold a two-stroke Jawa 350 Californian here, I'd buy one in a second.Lannis
I think you should look at what the Indian owned Jaguar Co. is doing & re-consider.
I suspect it will be built to the same standards as the current Royal Enfield, true to the design and quality of a bike from the 1950's. Perhaps even use the same frame design, engine castings, tires, and electrical components from the Prince of Darkness... Paul
No way. The reason they were able to do that for Royal Enfield is because they NEVER STOPPED making the Royal Enfield single from the 1950s on. They already owned the tooling, they owned the designs, and they just kept on plugging away with them. Didn't cost them a thing. It would cost a fortune to recreate the function and styling of an old BSA, and THEN nobody would buy it anyhow ...Lannis
Speaking of motorcycle brand "remakes" that never went too far...remember the 1990 Matchless Harris G80 500cc Rotax?
And two versions of Indian, and Excelsior-Henderson, and two former iterations of BSA, and the "rebirth" of Laverda, and ... and ... I am running out of hope ....Lannis
I have owned BSAs, and a range of other British bikes. But I am not all that excited about a 'new' BSA. But, I am certainly not one of those who is critical of what the Indians do. I think they are doing a great job of producing good motorcycles for their own population, and the world. More power to them! Seems that they are steadily improving their products.
[ I am often tempted to buy a new Royal Enfield because they have kick starters! I think that is cool. My SR500 always would gather a crowd when it was having a bad day and decided it didn't want to start and I would kick and kick and kick....
Guys crack me up. Brit bike guys more than most.Almost (and I'm being generous) all British bikes were crap by the time they sank. And I too loved them-until I started riding the things.Nice example, the Norton Commando, thought by many to be the best of the oily breed. Just look at the list of "must-do" items that were outlined here during a recent auction-almost every original bit has to be upgraded to be considered acceptable for daily, or even occasional use.Compare that to a contemporary Guzzi, or BMW, or Honda or whatever-they may all have issues now, but in general they worked well in period.So yeah, if Mahindra decides to rebrand their current line of home-market commuters as BSA, that would be a shame-but they are a pretty sharp bunch, and I think they'll do quite well.
Uh, 50 years ago many riders used Brit bikes on a daily basis without any of the modern modifications mentioned here. Often ridden in harsh conditions conditions...Of course they did require a lot of maintenance but they were not fragile machines. Triumph in the 50-60's won more races than anyone and most were based on production bikes...But you are correct, they were 1930's technology and long obsolete when the Guzzi and Honda were introduced...
The only Matchless that I ever wanted one of.
I had a 68 BSA Thunderbolt! cool old bike but the kicker gear always jammed and broke teeth
My post was an attempt at satire, not to be taken seriously...... jeeeezzzz.Paul