New 20 ounce tumblers available now! Forum donation credit with purchase. https://www.wildguzzi.com/Products/products.htm#Tumbler
My point almost exactly. In the '50s riders put up with things-and didn't complain- because the technology of bikes at the time was pretty close to blacksmith tech. Though there was some serious crap being produced, even then, and even by the standards of the day.
Nice example, the Norton Commando, thought by many to be the best of the oily breed. Just look at the list of "must-do" items that were outlined here during a recent auction-almost every original bit has to be upgraded to be considered acceptable for daily, or even occasional use.
Guys crack me up. Brit bike guys more than most.
I ride a non-authentic Triumph built in England. 2 of them, actually. I then grin "Illegal Smiles."
Good to be retired , eh Larry Dusty
Well, we're ALL having a good time then! I get cracked up by people who don't know anything about Brit bikes except what they've heard and what they think they remember from 19-ought-18 ..... !Some of us actually ride and rally and tour on them, and we have a sneaking suspicion of what a Bajaj or Mahindra interpretation of those would be ....Yep, a good day all 'round ....Lannis
You said this All the Brit 650-750's can be ridden daily and certainly occasionally with no upgrades.. They crude and have shorter engine lives...But you can ride them as they were built...
Sure they can, and they can be really sweet too. I just get weirded out when people "take umbrage" at a name revival, especially when the name originally went defunct for good reason.
Hi Lannis - What was the story behind this one - - BSA "Tempest" (??) or "Regal" (??)
the 'New" Triumph...nothing in common with the old company...
John Bloor owned "the old Triumph". He owns "the new Triumph".So "nothing in common" is a little strong. Bloor bought the defunct Triumph in Meridan, allowed Bonnevilles to be built under license (Racing Spares/Les Harris in Devon) while he tooled up the new company, then released "new Triumphs" in Hinckley.
I like Commandos a lot too. The one my friend recently sold is a beautiful bike, I considered buying one just to satisfy my high school lust, but I knew I wouldn't ride it more than 200 miles/year. And it does nothing that my current bike doesn't do better.
Nothing in common as in a new manufacturing company from the ground up building bikes with no connection to the old bikes. And look at the company logo, it's different...Les Harris still makes spare parts for the vintage Triumphs...
And look at the company logo, it's different... .
How many different logos has Moto Guzzi had? Doesn't make the bikes different.
http://www.bsa.asn.au/html/gallery/tempest/
Thanks Antietam Classic Cycle!! Never heard of a 1000cc Rhind-Tutt Wasp engine (??)
How many different engines other than the 90 degree V twin has Moto Guzzi manufactured since their first big road bikes were introduced in the 1960's? How any non shaft drive bikes? From 1938 until 1983 Triumph's most popular models were 500 -750 twins based on the original 1938 Speed twin..They made a few singles and the triples along the way but they were similar in design to the twins...In 1983 Triumph as it was known was gone... The Bloor "new" Triumphs are modern finely engineered machines with nothing in common to the old Triumph..
Bloor saved Triumph. And, I'm thankful he did. And, I'm thankful he didn't continue building the shite that Hinckley had been building for decades. Bloor saved the brand, and made it better. He could've gone the Royal Enfield route, but he didn't. And, look at what a wonderful thing Triumph is today !!!
How many different engines other than the 90 degree V twin has Moto Guzzi manufactured since their first big road bikes were introduced in the 1960's? How any non shaft drive bikes?