Author Topic: new v old  (Read 14355 times)

Offline drlapo

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1017
new v old
« on: January 22, 2015, 12:56:33 PM »
I was rereading the Decmber 1989 issue of Classic Bike. they test a MG V7 Sport. they claim 52 bhp ( MG claimed 70bhp) and 500 pounds. top speed of 120mph
seat height 30"
wheel base 57.8"

my 13 V7 compares favorably with 2 less hp and 100 fewer pounds

Classic Bike liked the R90S a little better and declared the MG a better sporting machine

Offline Sheepdog

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 5575
  • 2007 Moto Guzzi California Vintage
  • Location: Waldheim, Louisiana. USA
Re: new v old
« Reply #1 on: January 22, 2015, 01:11:18 PM »
I thought the power claimed by MG (for both bikes) was for crankshaft horsepower, not rear-wheel horsepower. (the technique used by bike mags).  A loss of 15% of an engine's crank hp (due to friction) is common with shaft-drive bikes...
« Last Edit: January 22, 2015, 03:02:32 PM by Sheepdog »
"Change is inevitable. Growth is optional." John C. Maxwell

Offline arveno

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1752
    • ddleathers.com
Re: new v old
« Reply #2 on: January 22, 2015, 03:16:32 PM »
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moto_Guzzi_V7_Sport


Often Magazines are wrong.... i remember when the stelvio came out , the mag were saying the stelvio was way heavier than the GS , but i remember few members/owner here prove that they were wrong .

http://www.motociclismo.it/gallery/epoca/motociclismo-depoca-di-febbraio-2015/motociclismo-depoca-di-febbraio-2015_10
« Last Edit: January 22, 2015, 03:19:41 PM by arveno »

Offline flip

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1398
  • Aprilia Caponord 1200, Aprilia Shiver, gone MG B11
Re: new v old
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2015, 08:18:06 PM »
Quote from: drlapo link=topic=74359.msg1163587#msg1163587 daThanks te=1421952993
I was rereading the Decmber 1989 issue of Classic Bike. they test a MG V7 Sport. they claim 52 bhp ( MG claimed 70bhp) and 500 pounds. top speed of 120mph
seat height 30"
wheel base 57.8"

my 13 V7 compares favorably with 2 less hp and 100 fewer pounds

Don't the newer V7s put out about 40-42 hp at the rear wheel? So, down about 10 hp and 15 mph or so top speed.
North Carolina

Wildguzzi.com

Re: new v old
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2015, 08:18:06 PM »

oldbike54

  • Guest
Re: new v old
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2015, 08:33:42 PM »
I've always been a bit dubious about the performance claims from that era . The Original V7 Sport cant have been much faster or quicker than a good R75/5 , maybe 107 mph .

  Dusty

Offline arveno

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1752
    • ddleathers.com
Re: new v old
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2015, 09:40:46 PM »
I've always been a bit dubious about the performance claims from that era . The Original V7 Sport cant have been much faster or quicker than a good R75/5 , maybe 107 mph .

  Dusty

I can't say anything about the declared HP but i can tell for sure that the v7 sport was waay faster than the 75/5 ( i owned both ) and they are like night and day.

Regarding the max speed my V7 could reach easily the declared 200km/h.


oldbike54

  • Guest
Re: new v old
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2015, 09:51:24 PM »
I can't say anything about the declared HP but i can tell for sure that the v7 sport was waay faster than the 75/5 ( i owned both ) and they are like night and day.

Regarding the max speed my V7 could reach easily the declared 200km/h.



I am just going by personal experience . At one time in the early '80s , was part of a small riding group that included an R75/5 , a really nice low mileage V7 Sport , an 850 Commando , and my slightly modded '77 T140V . They all possessed almost identical performance , dunno .

  Dusty

Offline arveno

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1752
    • ddleathers.com
Re: new v old
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2015, 10:03:53 PM »
I have to admit i am biased when comparing guzzi with other bikes.... :) but the V7 120 mph declered were real

Never owned or ever ridden a british bike..tho.


« Last Edit: January 22, 2015, 10:06:00 PM by arveno »

Offline arveno

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1752
    • ddleathers.com
Re: new v old
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2015, 10:08:28 PM »


Allow me to share this beautiful pic ( imho )
Nico Cereghini ( Laverda)
V.Brambilla   ( guzzi )

Monza circuit .

Offline kevdog3019

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 5648
Re: new v old
« Reply #9 on: January 22, 2015, 10:11:13 PM »
It would have to be a very big hill for the current sb V7 to teach 120mph. It's more like 105-110. The currents are 38-40 rwhp.
'86 V65 "Super" Lario
'85 Honda Nighthawk 700s
'86 V65 Lario

Offline JoeW

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 2483
    • The Guzzi Doctor
Re: new v old
« Reply #10 on: January 22, 2015, 10:58:25 PM »
My first Guzzi was a 73 Sport. I traded a 750 Norton Combat for it, it was 1977. I was a punk college student with no money and less fear. The Commando was a very quick bike, just under 13 seconds in the quarter mile stock, it would kill the Sport off the line. But, the Sport was way more capable and steady at speed. I was out riding with a couple friends one night. We had pizza in a neighboring town. On the way home my friend on his CB750 took off from the last light heading out of town, the next buddy on his 850 Commando followed. Since I had my girl friend on the back, I gave her the "hold on" tap on the hands and rolled it on. As I caught the Norton, I shifted into 4th then pulled along side the Honda and hit 5th, and rolled past him. They both told me later that they were topped out. How fast was I going? Faster than them, that's all I know. I'd like to see the dyno chart for a stock V7 Sport because I just ran a 2014 V7 Café at a local shop and it pulled 38.4 HP.
Joe Walano

Offline Aaron D.

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 5883
Re: new v old
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2015, 06:36:21 AM »
I know from experience a V7 Sport had a higher top speed than any stock Commando, CB750 (sohc or dohc) or even a breathed-upon MV600 with clip-ons etc. A 75/5 isn't close.


Offline JoeW

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 2483
    • The Guzzi Doctor
Re: new v old
« Reply #12 on: January 23, 2015, 08:15:06 AM »
I know from experience a V7 Sport had a higher top speed than any stock Commando, CB750 (sohc or dohc) or even a breathed-upon MV600 with clip-ons etc. A 75/5 isn't close.
:+1
The funny thing was, shortly after that night on my Sport, I rode it home to Chicago, 350 miles. I noticed a rod knock when I arrived. I pulled the pan in a friends garage and found babbit flakes. I replaced the rod bearings and rode back to school. That winter I tore the engine down and found a severely worn cam, the number one exhaust lobe was about 1/4 shorter than number 2. I replaced the cam, case, oil pump, had the crankshaft reground and new main and rod bearings. I sold my pickup to finance it. Stupid college kid that I was, I tossed the case without stamping the numbers in the new one. So, if any of you find a 73 sport, with no engine numbers, it could be my old bike. I sold it to a guy in Tucson in 1980.
Joe Walano

redrider

  • Guest
Re: new v old
« Reply #13 on: January 23, 2015, 08:39:39 AM »
In 75 I owned a Kaw 400 triple. Port, polish, chambers-The Denco set-up. Supposedly good for 62 rwhp. I made lots of enemies among the CB crowd. It was a slugfest with the Hondas being the slugs.

One day on Carter St, a 76 Commando(white with blue and red striping) simply waxed my butt in a roll on. Never could catch up.

HP is a sales tool. I prefer the crank measurement. It is the most correct, IMO. RWHP is not exact-change the gear ratio at any point in the drive train and the numbers will be different even with the same engine.

Offline sib

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1744
  • Location: Smallest state, 221 times smaller than Texas, often compared to the size of an oil slick, forest fire, or ice sheet
Re: new v old
« Reply #14 on: January 23, 2015, 10:17:58 AM »
It would have to be a very big hill for the current sb V7 to teach 120mph. It's more like 105-110. The currents are 38-40 rwhp.

The calculated top speed at redline (7200 rpm) and with stock tires is 113.2 mph for the recent 5-speed V7 models and 115.2 mph for the new 6-speed ABS models.  I have no personal experience about whether the bikes will actually go that fast, but my '13 V7 Stone sure gets me up to 90 mph quickly on a flat road with no tailwind, and seems to be accelerating well at that speed.  I'll leave it to braver and younger riders to report how much faster these bikes can actually go.
Current: 2021 V7 Stone E5
Previous: 2016 V7II Stone
Previous: 2013 V7 Stone
Several decades ago: 1962? Honda CB77 Super Hawk

Offline JoeW

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 2483
    • The Guzzi Doctor
Re: new v old
« Reply #15 on: January 23, 2015, 11:52:50 AM »


Allow me to share this beautiful pic ( imho )
Nico Cereghini ( Laverda)
V.Brambilla   ( guzzi )

Monza circuit .
I would like to find a good copy of this photo. Anybody have a source?
Joe Walano

Offline arveno

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1752
    • ddleathers.com
Re: new v old
« Reply #16 on: January 23, 2015, 12:19:48 PM »
who said that the new V7 max speed is 120 mph ? NOT me .

I was talking about the ORIGINAL V7 sport, and yes , no need to go downhill to get 200 all'ora with that bike.
« Last Edit: January 23, 2015, 12:20:44 PM by arveno »

oldbike54

  • Guest
Re: new v old
« Reply #17 on: January 23, 2015, 12:41:04 PM »
Fellas , I never said the V7 Sport wasn't a bit faster than an R75 , but does anyone have verifiable evidence that they would run a true 120 MPH .

  Dusty

Offline yogidozer

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 2920
Re: new v old
« Reply #18 on: January 23, 2015, 02:13:09 PM »
Let's just agree....it's fast enough :-)

Offline arveno

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1752
    • ddleathers.com
Re: new v old
« Reply #19 on: January 23, 2015, 02:57:31 PM »
Fellas , I never said the V7 Sport wasn't a bit faster than an R75 , but does anyone have verifiable evidence that they would run a true 120 MPH .

  Dusty


we should address this question to the V7 sport owners on this forum , they should now better...or ...sadly those bikes are just "garage queen " ? ;)

« Last Edit: January 23, 2015, 02:58:28 PM by arveno »

Offline Chuck in Indiana

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 29453
Re: new v old
« Reply #20 on: January 23, 2015, 05:58:39 PM »
I would like to find a good copy of this photo. Anybody have a source?

Me, too. Great shot..
Chuck in (Elwood) Indiana/sometimes SoCal
 
87 AeroLario
95 Skorpion tour
22 Royal Enfield Classic 3 fiddy
 "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe."
Albert Einstein

Offline Aaron D.

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 5883
Re: new v old
« Reply #21 on: January 23, 2015, 06:08:08 PM »
I am pretty darned sure a V7 Sport with fresh plugs would do 120. It required being flat on the tank.

If you believe a CB750F DOHC would do 115, then I know a  V7 Sport will do 120 because I watched one absolutely walk away from said Honda during a looong straight with a bunch of bikes pinned for miles.

Verifiable? Maybe the old MIRA tests from one of the Brit bike mags-Mike Nicks had an 850T as considerably fastet than a Commando. So maybe we can find that.

Offline LowRyter

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 16692
  • Location: Edmond OK
Re: new v old
« Reply #22 on: January 23, 2015, 08:32:33 PM »
I am just going by personal experience . At one time in the early '80s , was part of a small riding group that included an R75/5 , a really nice low mileage V7 Sport , an 850 Commando , and my slightly modded '77 T140V . They all possessed almost identical performance , dunno .

  Dusty

you better watch yourself around here

« Last Edit: January 23, 2015, 08:35:59 PM by LowRyter »
John L 
When life gets you down remember it's one down and the rest are up.  (1-N-23456)

Offline LowRyter

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 16692
  • Location: Edmond OK
Re: new v old
« Reply #23 on: January 23, 2015, 08:34:52 PM »
Michael D still rides his , and if he would answer his phone or Emails ... ;D
 
  Dusty

having ridden with him on my Greenie, it is a surprisingly fast little motorcycle.

I am still watching you!   ::(
John L 
When life gets you down remember it's one down and the rest are up.  (1-N-23456)

Offline JoeW

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 2483
    • The Guzzi Doctor
Re: new v old
« Reply #24 on: January 23, 2015, 09:13:10 PM »


Allow me to share this beautiful pic ( imho )
Nico Cereghini ( Laverda)
V.Brambilla   ( guzzi )

Monza circuit .
Thanks Marco for posting this, I ordered one from Photobucket. I had seen this photo years ago and in my memory, the other bike was a BMW. Maybe I'm thinking of a different photo. However, the question is, who is over taking who in this shot? As a life long Guzzi rider, that Laverda rider looks awfully surprised!
Joe Walano

Offline arveno

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1752
    • ddleathers.com
Re: new v old
« Reply #25 on: January 24, 2015, 08:23:49 AM »
[quote author=JoeW
Thanks Marco for posting this, I ordered one from Photobucket. I had seen this photo years ago and in my memory, the other bike was a BMW. Maybe I'm thinking of a different photo. However, the question is, who is over taking who in this shot? As a life long Guzzi rider, that Laverda rider looks awfully surprised!
[/quote]



Joe , after a little bit of search i have found out that pic was taken June 25 th 1972 at the 500Km endurance race in Monza.
Racers :
Laverda :Nico Cereghini ( foto) and Adalberto Falletta

Moto Guzzi:Raimonda Riva and Vittorio Brambilla (foto)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vittorio_Brambilla

Hope this help !
Ciao
Marco
« Last Edit: January 24, 2015, 08:31:30 AM by arveno »

Offline jas67

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 5439
  • Location: Palmyra, PA
Re: new v old
« Reply #26 on: January 24, 2015, 08:33:29 AM »
2017 V7III Special
1977 Le Mans
1974 Eldorado
2017 Triumph Thruxton R
2013 Ducati Monster 796, 2013 848 Evo Corse SE, 1974 750GT, 1970 Mk3d 450 Desmo, 1966 Monza 250
1975 Moto Morini 3 1/2
2007 Vespa GTS250
2016 BMW R1200RS, 80 R100S, 76 R90S ,73 R75/5
76 Honda CB400F, 67 305 Super Hawk, 68 CL175

lee swanger

  • Guest
Re: new v old
« Reply #27 on: January 24, 2015, 09:30:47 AM »
My 1973 V-7 Sport I bought new was specified top speed in the manual of about 129.5. And I remember it would go that fast or close to it. Handling was great, too.

Offline guzzista

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1049
  • Location: SF Bay Area
Re: new v old
« Reply #28 on: January 24, 2015, 11:59:05 AM »
Thanks Marco for posting this, I ordered one from Photobucket. I had seen this photo years ago and in my memory, the other bike was a BMW. Maybe I'm thinking of a different photo. However, the question is, who is over taking who in this shot? As a life long Guzzi rider, that Laverda rider looks awfully surprised!
Nico Cereghini wasnt surprised, methinks, as he was the original test rider/ journo for Motociclismo when the V7Sport was featued in print. He also had plenty access to Moto Guzzi at the time. Brambilla, OTOH, was a pro racer that had serious time on the GP circuit , so Cereghini probably had a "dang ,here he comes !" look on ....just wish I was there
1975 750S Tribute bike, 1994 Cali 1100, 2007 Ducati GT1000, 1983 SP1000, 1973 V7Sport project, 2017 California1400 Touring

Offline jabberwocky

  • Gosling
  • ***
  • Posts: 400
Re: new v old
« Reply #29 on: January 24, 2015, 12:07:47 PM »
Those of you who are confident that the V7Sport will do 120 plus, what is your evidence? You know that the speedos are notoriously optimistic, don't you? I'd be pretty surprised if one would do an honest 120 by timing or radar.

***Wildguzzi Official Logo High Quality 5 Color Window Decals Back In Stock***
Shipping in USA Only. Awesome quality. Back by popular demand. All proceeds go back into the forum.
Best quality vinyl available today. Easy application.
Advertise Here
 

20 Ounce Stainless Steel Double Insulated Tumbler
Buy a quality tumbler and support the forum at the same time!
Better than a YETI! BPA and Lead free.
Advertise Here