New 20 ounce tumblers available now! Forum donation credit with purchase. https://www.wildguzzi.com/Products/products.htm#Tumbler
Where did you get Hemi head from Kev? They're a horrid, dirty, inefficient thing.Pete
I'd prefer a clean sheet design that resembled the 1400 or 1200 engine vs. a rehash of the V7. Peak HP is not as interesting to me as a high peak torque at low rpm. Especially for a bike that looks like the V9 (for a racer version, a more perky-peaky motor would be acceptable).Completely new = so vague as to be meaningless.
What you and us prefer is not where Piaggio calculates with. They have a 1977 design, and that makes up most of the production. That makes more money then reinventing something completely new. And even if a few more would be sold, it will still be low numbers.
Completely new means different things to different people. Completely new = so vague as to be meaningless.
Actually in Mandello it means, "Yet another great opportunity to thoroughly botch the valve train on a new model."
Lario, flat tappet 1200.... what's next?
There are other rumors that Mandello R&D is looking at a revolutionary liquid-cooled, side-valve configuration that resembles the front quarter of a flat head Ford.
Lario, flat tappet 1200.... what's next? Yeah, sadly, you might be right.
Looking at the photos, I don't see where a timing chain could be for an OHV set up. I would bet that they are making the 850 cc mark with an 84 mm bore and a little more stroke than a 750 engine.I think that a hemi head would be physically much larger than the one in the picture as well.So, just a guess here, I bet that engine is a bored and stroked 750cc engine, with a heron head and bigger valves. I really hope it is, would love to get my hands on V9, change a few things on the body, and bolt some 4V heads on it. A nice light 850, with say 70 to 75 RWHP...that would awesome...
Yer an animal, Mike..
Paul , do the angled valves indicate this is a hemi head or still a Heron head engine ? Dusty
The copy says the valves are not parallel so that means valves at an angle which would mean some sort of hemispherical head instead of the flat-topped heron heads.Who cares? Whatever changes they've made seem to have produced little gain over the 750 motor.Maybe something else is in the works.
Very unimpressive power numbers.Very disappointing.Why would they go through the time and expense of designing an upgraded motor that puts out about the same power of the 750 motor?The 900 version of the new Triumph will leave the Guzzi behind in the dust.
And, as Jay pointed out, we both find the small 1-2 hp gain the 1TB offered over the 2TB smallblock to be a not insignificant difference. This appears to be "even more of that" - meaning more than double that.
If those 55 HP means 50 at the rear wheel, we have a gain near to the 20% over the V7 II, that's surely sensible.Still disappointing (from a 850 hemi head, I estimated 58 at the rear), but that could mean that there is room for improvement with more sporty models.
How could 55 crank = 50 wheelWhen V7 50 crank = 40 wheel???