Author Topic: moly, is it really needed  (Read 12744 times)

Offline rbond

  • Hatchling
  • **
  • Posts: 172
  • Location: Alexandria, La.
moly, is it really needed
« on: March 30, 2015, 11:07:25 AM »
Since I am using full synthetic oil in the rear end, do I still need to put moly in too? With synthetic it just seems like overkill.....
2012 MG V7C
1976 Suzuki GT500A
1978 Suzuki GS400C (long gone)
1973 Suzuki TS 100K (first new bike)
1969 Honda S90 (very first bike)

Offline Two Checks

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 6035
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2015, 11:14:05 AM »
As long as the oil is rated GL-5 it isnot needed.
1990 Cal III f/f  "Il Duce' III"
1987 1000 SPII "Il Duce' II"

Offline Lannis

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 26507
  • Location: Central Virginia
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2015, 11:15:07 AM »
Since I am using full synthetic oil in the rear end, do I still need to put moly in too? With synthetic it just seems like overkill.....

Check your owner's manual for the bike you're riding.  It has a whole lot better information in it than the "Well I use it and my bike's doing fine" and "Well I don't use it and my bike's running fine" that you'll get here ....

Lannis
"Hard pounding, this, gentlemen; let's see who pounds the longest".

Online Antietam Classic Cycle

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 14190
  • Happily stuck in the past.
    • Antietam Classic Cycle
  • Location: Rohrersville, Maryland
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2015, 11:29:37 AM »
Helps if we know what bike.
Charlie

Wildguzzi.com

Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2015, 11:29:37 AM »

Online Wayne Orwig

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 13913
    • Hog Mountain weather
  • Location: Hog Mountain
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2015, 11:37:21 AM »
Don't hate me for feeding an oil thread....
But what the heck does using synthetic have to do with the EP additive? If the manual says use moly, don't you technically still need moly?
And yes, I know that most rear dive lube has some moly.
 
Scientist have discovered that people will believe anything, if you first say "Scientists have discovered...."

Offline Two Checks

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 6035
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2015, 12:49:41 PM »
The moly requirement was when GL-4 was the recommended lubricant.
1990 Cal III f/f  "Il Duce' III"
1987 1000 SPII "Il Duce' II"

Offline sib

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1744
  • Location: Smallest state, 221 times smaller than Texas, often compared to the size of an oil slick, forest fire, or ice sheet
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #6 on: March 30, 2015, 12:56:28 PM »
I agree with Lannis here.  it's amazing what you can find in the owner's manual, answers to burning questions that get asked over and over again on this forum, including "what should my valve adjustments be?", what should my spark plug gap be?", what weight oil should I use?", "what tire pressures should I use?", etc.  For some mysterious reason, the manufacturer has done research to determine these things, and it actually releases the results to the general public, in the form of owner's manuals.  Who would have thought?
Current: 2021 V7 Stone E5
Previous: 2016 V7II Stone
Previous: 2013 V7 Stone
Several decades ago: 1962? Honda CB77 Super Hawk

Offline youcanrunnaked

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 3794
  • '03 California EV; Suzuki SV650; Suzuki DR650
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #7 on: March 30, 2015, 01:08:32 PM »
If a rear diff is spec'd to use GL-4 oil + moly, I would think it best to use that, rather than GL-5 without moly.  While GL-5 has a slightly higher EP rating that GL-4, how can you say whether GL-5 alone is the EP equivalent of GL-4 + moly, without extensive testing to prove it?  Otherwise, you're just guessing.

Also, my understanding is that GL-5 causes additional wear on brass and other soft metals, which is why it is not recommended for certain transmissions, where it can muck up the synchros.  No idea if that concern applies to any Guzzi rear differentials (or transmission), though.  Anyone?
« Last Edit: March 30, 2015, 01:09:33 PM by youcanrunnaked »
"The transverse vibration is a great sensation -- hey, I think I just wrote a song!"
-- Billy Joel, Motorcyclist, 02/2012

"If Moto Guzzi were any more of a cult, you'd need a chicken."
--- Dan Neil, The Wall Street Journal, 04/19/2013

Offline Dilliw

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 3674
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #8 on: March 30, 2015, 01:35:39 PM »
If a rear diff is spec'd to use GL-4 oil + moly, I would think it best to use that, rather than GL-5 without moly.  While GL-5 has a slightly higher EP rating that GL-4, how can you say whether GL-5 alone is the EP equivalent of GL-4 + moly, without extensive testing to prove it?  Otherwise, you're just guessing.

Also, my understanding is that GL-5 causes additional wear on brass and other soft metals, which is why it is not recommended for certain transmissions, where it can muck up the synchros.  No idea if that concern applies to any Guzzi rear differentials (or transmission), though.  Anyone?

The EV's were spec'd for Rotra MP which is listed as meeting GL-5.  The spec was MP 80/90 + molykote and there's no mention of GL-4 or GL-5.

I doubt a little moly can hurt though and it's pretty cheap to get:


http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CPL8UPY/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER
« Last Edit: March 30, 2015, 01:37:41 PM by Dilliw »
George Westbury
Austin, TX
2003 EVT "The Tank"
2011 Griso SE

L-824 and L-825


Offline Two Checks

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 6035
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #10 on: March 30, 2015, 01:57:23 PM »
Actually the GL-5 doesn't muck up sychros, it's too slippery for many. Not enough friction for the synchros to slow in order to do their job.

And the OP specifically asked about the final drive, so the point about synchros is moot, albeit good general info.
1990 Cal III f/f  "Il Duce' III"
1987 1000 SPII "Il Duce' II"

Offline sib

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1744
  • Location: Smallest state, 221 times smaller than Texas, often compared to the size of an oil slick, forest fire, or ice sheet
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #11 on: March 30, 2015, 02:04:54 PM »
Not sure about the other MG gearboxes, but the 5-sp on the V7 Stone/Special/Racer doesn't have synchros, it uses clash gears (horrible, but descriptive term).  And no brass parts as far as I'm aware.
Current: 2021 V7 Stone E5
Previous: 2016 V7II Stone
Previous: 2013 V7 Stone
Several decades ago: 1962? Honda CB77 Super Hawk

Offline Lannis

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 26507
  • Location: Central Virginia
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #12 on: March 30, 2015, 02:10:31 PM »
Actually the GL-5 doesn't muck up sychros, it's too slippery for many. Not enough friction for the synchros to slow in order to do their job.

And the OP specifically asked about the final drive, so the point about synchros is moot, albeit good general info.

He did ask.   He (per previous posts) has a 2012 V7C.

Looks like the best way we could help him is by pulling up a copy of the owner's or the shop manual and letting him know whether a moly additive of any kind is specified for his bike?

Nobody's done that yet; we're just doing the usual thing of going back and forth about GL4 and GL5 and the difference between gearboxes and transmissions and synthetic and dino and all that.

I don't have access to a copy myself.

Lannis
"Hard pounding, this, gentlemen; let's see who pounds the longest".

Offline HDGoose

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 13574
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #13 on: March 30, 2015, 02:24:28 PM »
RTFM.

Offline Dilliw

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 3674
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #14 on: March 30, 2015, 02:32:57 PM »
George Westbury
Austin, TX
2003 EVT "The Tank"
2011 Griso SE

L-824 and L-825

Offline Arizona Wayne

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 6257
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #15 on: March 30, 2015, 02:42:56 PM »
I've used GL5 rearend oil in an `71 Ambo., `80 Convert, `81 CX100(over 100K mi.), `87 LM IV, `04  750 Breva with NO moly added and have had NO rearend oil issues whatsoever !!   ;-T  Give this argument a rest.

Offline Sasquatch Jim

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 9600
  • Sidecar - Best drive by shooting vehicle ever
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #16 on: March 30, 2015, 03:05:55 PM »
  I thought the moly was there to help blacken your fingers when working on the bike.
Sasquatch Jim        Humanoid, sort of.

Offline charlie b

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 6941
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #17 on: March 30, 2015, 03:40:29 PM »
No, the moly only works if you are wearing a white shirt and a tshirt does not count.

The more expensive it is the better the moly works :)
1984 850 T5 (sold)
2009 Dodge Cummins 2500

Offline Triple Jim

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 5930
    • Lakeland Services Company
  • Location: North Central North Carolina
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #18 on: March 30, 2015, 03:57:28 PM »
Moly and Never-Seez are very similar in their ability to color things.  A gram of either one is capable of covering fourteen square miles of surface in a dark silver-grey.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2015, 04:00:35 PM by Triple Jim »
When the Brussels sprout fails to venture from its lair, it is time to roll a beaver up a grassy slope.

oldbike54

  • Guest
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #19 on: March 30, 2015, 04:11:46 PM »
Moly and Never-Seez are very similar in their ability to color things.  A gram of either one is capable of covering fourteen square miles of surface in a dark silver-grey.

 I once sat down on a full open tube of high temp anti seize with predictable results  ::)

  Dusty

Offline Groover

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 2858
  • If it ain't broke, I'll break it.
    • Scooteropolis
  • Location: Columbus, Ohio
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #20 on: March 30, 2015, 04:23:40 PM »
Some info here on this thread I posted a while ago. Lots of input, and many hours of research on my end and great input from others. - yes, I obsess sometimes, and the linked thread shows sings of my sickness  ;D

http://wildguzzi.com/forum/index.php?topic=70913.0


Good luck.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2015, 04:24:13 PM by Groover »
1981 Moto Guzzi V1000G5
1987 Moto Guzzi LM1000SE, a
1987 Moto Guzzi LM1000SE, b
1980 Piaggio Vespa P200E
1980 Piaggio Vespa P125X
1980 Vespa Grande Moped
1980 Vespa SI Moped
http://scooteropolis.com/

Online Antietam Classic Cycle

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 14190
  • Happily stuck in the past.
    • Antietam Classic Cycle
  • Location: Rohrersville, Maryland
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #21 on: March 30, 2015, 04:46:22 PM »
So after Lannis did his best Sherlock Holmes impression and found that the bike in question in the original post was a 2012 V7, I had a look at the owner's manual where it simply says: AGIP GEAR MG SAE 85W-140 . No mention of moly. Draw your own conclusion.

Charlie

Offline Chuck in Indiana

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 29453
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #22 on: March 30, 2015, 05:16:07 PM »
So after Lannis did his best Sherlock Holmes impression and found that the bike in question in the original post was a 2012 V7, I had a look at the owner's manual where it simply says: AGIP GEAR MG SAE 85W-140 . No mention of moly. Draw your own conclusion.



Yeah but.... you're trusting a Guzzi manual to be correct.  ;D
Chuck in (Elwood) Indiana/sometimes SoCal
 
87 AeroLario
95 Skorpion tour
22 Royal Enfield Classic 3 fiddy
 "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe."
Albert Einstein

Offline ohiorider

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 8086
  • "You can't fight in here - this is the War Room."
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #23 on: March 30, 2015, 05:20:49 PM »
Have to ask ..... don't most motorcycle transmissions use shift dogs vs synchronizer rings?  My 1200 Sport and Griso8vSE both shift extremely smoothly, but so does my 24 year old R100GS that uses shift dogs.  If my Sport and Griso have synchronizers, I've been doing a lot of throttle/clutch/rpm synchronization for nothing.  But I don't think they do.

Bob
Main ride:  2008 Guzzi 1200 Sport (sold July 2020)
2012 Griso 8v SE (sold Sept '15)
Reliable standby: 1991 BMW R100GS
2014 Honda CB1100 (Traded Nov 2019)
New:  2016 Triumph T120 (Traded Dec 2021)
New:  2021 Kawasaki W800

Rough Edge racing

  • Guest
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #24 on: March 30, 2015, 05:47:58 PM »
 Motorcycle transmissions use dog clutch but no cone clutches (synchos)...Cars have "dogs" also  but the teeth are very fine and need the synchro cone clutches to match up the dog teeth speeds for silent engagement.
   Down shift a bike slowly without blipping the throttle and they all crunch to some degree.
  Modern design cars tyranny generally have fibre synchros suitable for use with ATF , motor oil or lighter gear oils . The older vehicles and some newer trucks have what people call brass, but is usually forged bronze synchro rings. They rely on friction and for some, as mentioned ,GL5 oil is too slippery because of friction modifiers.
 There's also reports of the increased sulfur in GL5 oil eroding the yellow metals. Generally though to happen at high oil temperatures.....
 Does a Guzzi have brass or bronze thrust washers in the trans or rear axle? If so and no one is reporting problems ...it's of no concern I suppose

Offline Triple Jim

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 5930
    • Lakeland Services Company
  • Location: North Central North Carolina
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #25 on: March 30, 2015, 06:03:57 PM »
Does a Guzzi have brass or bronze thrust washers in the trans or rear axle? If so and no one is reporting problems ...it's of no concern I suppose

From the thread linked above:
Quote from: Triple Jim
Does any Guzzi transmission or final drive contain any "yellow metal" parts that GL-5 oil would tend to corrode?

Quote from: Antietam Classic Cycle
Yes. Loop and Tonti rear drives have a thrust washer that is some sort of yellow metal and all of the gears of 4 spds. run on yellow metal bushings. That is why I only use CRC Sta-Lube GL-4 Gear Oil or a GL-5 that specifies "safe for yellow metals" in 4 spds.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2015, 06:10:29 PM by Triple Jim »
When the Brussels sprout fails to venture from its lair, it is time to roll a beaver up a grassy slope.

Offline Dick

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1192
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #26 on: March 30, 2015, 06:08:54 PM »
Yeah but.... you're trusting a Guzzi manual to be correct.  ;D

What was he thinking?  ;D

Offline Lannis

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 26507
  • Location: Central Virginia
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #27 on: March 30, 2015, 06:23:51 PM »
Yeah but.... you're trusting a Guzzi manual to be correct.  ;D

Oh, I'd MUCH rather trust the "average" of 17 different opinions that say you should mix everything from acetone to moly to clarified butter to straight 90W to Marvel Mystery Oil into your gasoline, engine oil, and/or rear drive lube ....

If I "average out" any advice on the right lube for my bike, it'll be what Charlie and/or Pete says, which is generally "go with the manual".   

Lannis
"Hard pounding, this, gentlemen; let's see who pounds the longest".

Offline Dilliw

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 3674
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #28 on: March 30, 2015, 06:43:27 PM »
So after Lannis did his best Sherlock Holmes impression and found that the bike in question in the original post was a 2012 V7, I had a look at the owner's manual where it simply says: AGIP GEAR MG SAE 85W-140 . No mention of moly. Draw your own conclusion.



And interesting enough, although my owner's manual says to use molykote the Technical Data Sheet I linked above from Moto Guzzi Service does not even for the models going back to the early '90s.  
« Last Edit: March 30, 2015, 09:05:32 PM by Dilliw »
George Westbury
Austin, TX
2003 EVT "The Tank"
2011 Griso SE

L-824 and L-825

Offline Chuck in Indiana

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 29453
Re: moly, is it really needed
« Reply #29 on: March 30, 2015, 07:48:59 PM »
And interesting enough, although my owner's manual says to use molykote the Technical Data Sheet I linked above from Moto Guzzi Service does not it for even the models going back to the early '90s. 

And I reiterate:  ;D
Quote
Yeah but.... you're trusting a Guzzi manual to be correct.  Grin
Chuck in (Elwood) Indiana/sometimes SoCal
 
87 AeroLario
95 Skorpion tour
22 Royal Enfield Classic 3 fiddy
 "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe."
Albert Einstein

 

20 Ounce Stainless Steel Double Insulated Tumbler
Buy a quality tumbler and support the forum at the same time!
Better than a YETI! BPA and Lead free.
Advertise Here