New 20 ounce tumblers available now! Forum donation credit with purchase. https://www.wildguzzi.com/Products/products.htm#Tumbler
That would look good next to your Guzzi.
As I remember they had poor fuel economy (the opposite of a contemporary Ducati) and since the tank wasn’t that big, very poor fuel range.
___________________ ___________________ ___________________ ___________________ ____________
I had one, about 70 miles before fuel low light came on and not many miles after before it ran dry.
Otherwise a good bike but lacked the excitement/drama of the 916 that replaced it.
Great street motor, I had the last model year brand new.. Generally will run longer then any Ducati could even think about..As long as the valve chain tensioners are up to snuff.. Largest Carbs ever fitted to a twin motorcycle from the factory..(as said before)You could get 40 MPG on the road, but generally 30 mpg is what mine returned.. One of the nicest sounding motorcycles with stock pipes.. (IMO) Always handled like there was a hinge in the middle of the frame.. There are fixes, but a standard CBR-1000 would always be a better handling platform overall.
You must have missed the story of the Canadian 90's 900 with 250,000 miles on the original engine..It would have kept going except for a total wreck..100k miles is not unusual for a Ducati..[/quoteIt's not unusual for the air cooled ducs to go far fewer miles and be totally shot also.. Superhawk is another league altogether in long distance miles..
A pity they stopped making real Ducati's in 1985 but I guess one belt drive bike is OK.Even these slowly got any character removed after the original 2007 1100S.My worst on this was 110 kms to reserve. (10 litres)
I used to have an SP1. Only reason I got rid of it was it only made sense at 8 or 9 tenths. I quit while I was ahead. I ended up trading it for my SP1000.
It's not unusual for the air cooled ducs to go far fewer miles and be totally shot also.. Superhawk is another league altogether in long distance miles.. Quote What you say is not what I hear...A lot of Ducatis get beat to shit on track days..Those are the ones that make the bad news stories..But if you're riding super high miles per year, a Japanese bike may be the better choice..
What you say is not what I hear...A lot of Ducatis get beat to shit on track days..Those are the ones that make the bad news stories..But if you're riding super high miles per year, a Japanese bike may be the better choice..
Quote from: Brand X on April 26, 2021, 12:45:38 PMIt's not unusual for the air cooled ducs to go far fewer miles and be totally shot also.. Superhawk is another league altogether in long distance miles.. Quote What you say is not what I hear...A lot of Ducatis get beat to shit on track days..Those are the ones that make the bad news stories..But if you're riding super high miles per year, a Japanese bike may be the better choice..Ah, I see now we are talikng about Super Hawks, not RC51s. The image in the first post is blicked on my feed, and I assumed RC51 because if its "1 liter Ducati eater" monniker.
It's not unusual for the air cooled ducs to go far fewer miles and be totally shot also.. Superhawk is another league altogether in long distance miles.. Quote What you say is not what I hear...A lot of Ducatis get beat to shit on track days..Those are the ones that make the bad news stories..But if you're riding super high miles per year, a Japanese bike may be the better choice..Ah, I see now we are talikng about Super Hawks, not RC51s. The image in the first post is blicked on my feed, and I assumed RC51 because if its "1 liter Ducati eater" monniker.