New 20 ounce tumblers available now! Forum donation credit with purchase. https://www.wildguzzi.com/Products/products.htm#Tumbler
It's a bit more than your number, don't know if it's still available...but.. looks nice. I thought about it, but I don't need a 700cc class right now.https://offerup.com/item/detail/451761358/Maybe you should give her your 1400 and buy yourself a new one Tom
What she really, really wants is a Guzzi V7. I'm obviously not going to find one for 2k. Every Monza I see is a project. Neither she nor I want to spend the summer wrenching.
There is no Italian bike that is a wise choice for a 17 year old girl new to riding.
Saw a TV add for this site last night. Didn't know anyone was actually using it. Now I have another site I must search instead of searchtempest and cycletrader.
Huh? 5'6" 115 lbs,Two State Championships, and she's been riding for a few years...dad was thinking maybe a Monster.I respectfully disagree. Too many to list...V35, V35 Imola, V35C, V50 lll, V50 Monza, V50C, V65, V65C,V65SPetc..and so on
. A lightweight 250cc is a �safe� limit for a 17 year old girl new to road riding. It�s common sense safety. You start small and work your way up.
Oh for gawd's sake John said she's be riding for a couple of years. How can any of us arbitrarily decide what cc and # number is the magic limit.I mean no one is suggesting a 100 hp or an 800# behemoth. There are a lot of factors to safety, but none of us are going to bench press most bikes so why should she?What makes a 300# bike SO MUCH safer than a 400# bike? I mean it's not like the actual physical difference in the strength necessary to ride the two is 100# of force whether we're talking taking it off the side stand, steering it, moving it around a garage or parking lot, or even picking it up if it's dropped.And the bikes that have been suggested all have mild powertrains with relatively low hp and forgiving throttles.Honestly depending on where one lives and is going to ride I'm not entirely sure some 250cc bikes are "safer" than many of the mentioned alternatives just from a perspective of keeping the random psycho at bay by not holding up traffic.Of course the flip side of all of this is experience in the road. Personally I would want one of my kids to learn the ROAD better before I let them ride on the street. For ME I'd want to see a few years of experience driving a nice safe cage with zero accidents or infractions that demonstrated to me they've already got the skills of watching other motorists and predicting their sometimes unpredictable habits. I'd want them to demonstrate through time/miles that they have built their own proper habits to be out there in traffic. But that's me and I'm not suggesting John's wrong here.
Well, as others have mentioned, most of us have a very different opinion about that.I taught my 16-year-old son to ride using my Guzzi Centauro. If your learner isn't mature enough yet to process the information that "If you don't whack the throttle open, this will act the same way a 250 Honda acts", then they don't belong on ANY kind of bike until they grow up.And a girl, lacking the testosterone that would make them try to "show off", and therefore a bit more circumspect and thoughtful than the typical boy (although this varies a lot between individuals) should be even MORE capable if anything about thinking about what they're doing, and being careful with it.No reason in the world that a daughter can't learn on any weight and height of bike that she's capable of physically handling. If your fear is that they will suddenly turn irresponsible and stupid the minute they get out of your sight, then a 100cc tiddler is too much bike for them ....Lannis
John will decide what�s safe and right for his daughter. I�m happy to have offered my opinion about that.
With the exception of a small Monster, none of the bikes I'm considering have more than 40hp. They're not fire breathing machines. Except for a V7 they're all under 400lbs.