New 20 ounce tumblers available now! Forum donation credit with purchase. https://www.wildguzzi.com/Products/products.htm#Tumbler
70's cars were mostly pretty lame. Poor quality...I remember the door gaps in my mom's 1975 Pontiac. Had to be 1/2". The overhangs on many of those cars were enormous. The trunks stuck out several feet past the rear wheels. I wonder who set the record for overhang. I remember turning the key to the off position, and then waiting for the car to quit dieseling, and finally actually quit running. And rust. It was accepted that you'd have rust-through in just a few years. Kept Ziebart in business. I can understand some of the nostalgia for the 70's cars, as they had some style and individuality, but bottom line is, the American consumers were suckers. Thanks, Detroit.
....and lastly a Ranchero w/biggest engine you could get oem. Should have kept that one.
Not a massive car, but about 10 years ago I bought a 81 G body El Camino...It was rust free but well used..I converted it from auto to 4 speed manual, built a typical SBC engine, urethane suspenson and body mounts, S10 front springs, stiffer rears, changed the power steering box spooling fr a better feel. The result was a lowered car/truck that handled like a Camaro,a firm ride that was great on smooth roads.. It even had working AC....But there was always the poor build quaity, door windows that bowed outward at high speed, floppy doors,cheap trim parts and generally poor design ....The poor build quality just wears ya down....
Wishful thinking on their part. Where was that picture taken 'cuz it would take a lot of water to keep that yard green. Currently working on a '86 El Camino Conquista w/305" engine. No hot rod but I can work on it.
I have a '86 G body that I'm using for hauling bikes and as back-up. You ever replace the hinge pins on the doors. The driver's side is sagging. I'm waiting for the parts to come in. Seems straight forward but I'll be doing it by myself. I'm looking at the engine hoist or the bike lift. Not sure at this point.The mounting circle clips for the rear brake cylinders is a real piece of engineering design. Definitely confirms my theory that the design engineers don't work on the vehicles that they design.
I figured the bike lift would work best with caster wheels and tie-downs. Probably some 4x4's & 2x4's. Did you take the hinges completely off or just at the pins?
The insurance on the el Camino is like $200 bucks a year with Hagerty so I keep the truck. It has a 396 with Hooker Headers (mistake) and a mildly lump cam which sounds good at idle but of course it sucks buckets of gas and is unGodly hot in the summertime. In terms of size, I don't think it is much bigger than the standard F-150 and with any bike in the bed I can't close the tailgate just like the Tundra's I use to own. Guys are always trying to trade me their big ass trucks but they shy away when I try to hand them the keys.
My car is Riviera -73, I like to drive on it.
I removed the hinges becaue the pin holes were egg shaped..I welded and got them back it shape...Might be easier to buy new ones ff the quality is decent. Can't imagine any original one being around but ya never know.
That's a beauty. What size is the engine?
If it's a stock Riviera, they all came with the 455 ci engine; 250 HP standard or 260 HP with the performance options .. Pollution control was killing the 455 by then; the earlier 455s had options to take them to almost 400 HP ...LannisQuote from: john fish on December 02, 2020, 05:12:32 PMThat's a beauty. What size is the engine?
Remember those HP ratings are NET, not gross, like they wer in 1970.Today's engines make tons more power then the much bigger engines of yesteryear.For example, my 70s 318 Chargers were rated at 150 HP net.My 92 318 is rated at 230 net. That's the gross HP rating of the 318 in 1970.We have engines now running on pump gas making 700+ HP NET all the while getting twice the gas mileage. And these engines aren't even broken in at 100k.In all areas today's vehicles are light years ahead of cars from back then...except for one.RUST. Breathe on todays cars and you can hear them rust.MoPar or no car!
Rust? Most of todays vehicles are WAY better dealing with rust. I had a 65 El Camino that at 10 years of age had half a rear quarter panel fall of due to total rust through. Chrysler vehicles as a whole were rust buckets. Have owned four Hondas, three of which sat out their whole life and were never waxed. All had over 200K miles and one almost 300K with nothing more than slight bits of surface rust around the real wheel well. My old 96 Nissan PU had sat out it's whole life without any rust. Dusty is still using it. GliderJohn
You don't see many cars with painted stripes these days. All vinyl decals now. That is a beauty for sure. If I was the type who wanted to spend my weekends sitting around car shows I would have a rig like that. Definitely wouldn't drag race something that clean.
Ya, im sitting here in upstate NY and have to say anything over 10 years old is on borrowed time.. Most modern stuff is MUCH better in controlling rust. There are some out there that rot just as fast though... I think the much greater uses of salt, and this new slurry they are on the road is a huge factor though.. Working on cars from the 60's and 70's alot in the past I will say that with some exceptions [Aspen and Volare im looking at you!] the 70's stuff seemed to be sealed to the weather much better then the 60's stuff..