New 20 ounce tumblers available now! Forum donation credit with purchase. https://www.wildguzzi.com/Products/products.htm#Tumbler
They liked the Bobber always good to read.And it's no surprise that the Bobber handles better.... but much of the rest of the review was very subjective. I always like a some hard facts when comparing bikes. I mean other than just parroting what they got from the spec sheet, otherwise what are they actually offering me I couldn't get myself?Stuff like:"While the Sportster 1200 has more power, you can only confidently access that on a smooth highway." and"Yes, the 1200 accelerates with more authority, but not decisively faster." Uh, yeah, that means nothing.hell even "and has far more cornering clearance."So they don't have the ability or haven't bothered to measure things like: * lean angle (they only parrot the Harley brochure figure for the one and don't give you a comparative number for the V9)* 1/4 mile* Top speed* Braking distanceetc.
Face it Kev , the Bobber is superior in real life , the Harley is a poser . Dusty
Uh, yeah, ok... whatever man. Seriously if you're going to go fishing you at least need some bait.BTW, I really kinda dig the V9 more than I did when it was released. Though I'm still a Stone man... (lobs it).
No , not weak , the V9 is the superior motorbike for anyone who actually likes motorbikes . If you want to pose , then the Harley is the better choice . Dusty
No I think you had it right, that was a weak attempt, not that I said it, you just knew it....
In this case you are simply confused , it's OK to admit it Kev , you are really a Harley guy . Go ahead and say it , the truth will set you free . Dusty
Fairer comparison is the 883 vs V9
Not really. As mentioned in the article there is a considerable weight difference. Seat of the pants tells me that my 1200 Sportster is marginally quicker than the V9. 883 would always be in the V9's rearview mirror.
In a German motorcycle journal "Motorrad" (02/2018) is a nice driving report in which the V9 Bobber is compared with the HD Sportster 1200 Custom and the Triumph Bonneville Bobber. Light-footedness, optics, driving dynamics and especially the revving engine of the V9 are praised in the highest tones. Only the stereo springs and the load change reactions of the cardan are criticized. All in all, a very good test result. And here some data:Top speed: HD 180 km/h, MG 170 km/h, TR 177 km/h0-100 km/h: HD 5.3 sec, MG 5.3 sec, TR 3,9 sec.0-140 km/h: HD , 10.3 sec, MG 10.4 sec, TR 7.4 sec.60-100 km/h: HD 7.0 sec., MG 5.8 sec., TR 5.3 sec.100-140 km/h: HD 8.7 sec, MG 7.8 sec, TR 6.1 sec.Fuel consumption: HD 5.3 l, MG 4.5 l, TR 4.3 lRange: HD 321 km, MG 333 km, TR 212 kmCiaoLars
Perfect!...Thanks!That data speaks well for the V9 and explains a lot about what people are thinking with regards to butt dynos!
That 60-100km/h number is the one you'd feel most frequently in real world riding, and the V9 shows its best right about there...
Hello, fossil!I'm driving a Talbot Matra Murena! And: No, there is absolutely no relevant reaction of the cardan that I can feel when riding my V9. Therefor I cannot confirm the test result in this special point.CiaoLars
A 1400 Custom does 0-60 in 3.7 seconds and the 1/4 mile in 12.4 with a trap speed of around 100mph. I can't find spec's on the new 114's but most 103's are over 5 seconds to 60 and high 13's-low 14's in the 1/4 except for the touring models which are around 15 seconds in the 1/4.