New 20 ounce tumblers available now! Forum donation credit with purchase. https://www.wildguzzi.com/Products/products.htm#Tumbler
Ok so I need to be schooled on the differences and the best year(s), if there is a preference, on these 2 models.I realize the Convert was the 2 speed but was the SP only a 5 speed?I had a Convert Cali but want a more standard model.What I'm considering is the following please;*flat seat (or can add one)*lowest seat height*cast wheels (tubeless nice)*did any years have fuel injection?*Were there differences in models and/or model years on both of these models?*areas of concern*must address maintenance/service itemsThanks in advance!inditx
The SP bars are very comfortable as are the Convert although different, wider.Cast wheels on the SP are indeed suited for tubeless tire. My Convert has wires so I do not know whether those later year Convert cast wheels are tubeless, I would wager that they are. Some SPs have (had) a Brembo F09 rear caliper too... Both are just the epitome of the Roundfin Guzzis. SPs are my all time favorite Guzzis, I've owned four, still have one to restore... one-a-these days. The Convert was recommissioned a couple of years ago. rad__
There is a SPNT ,then a SP2 and SP3.The cast wheels on the nt are tube type but some people have made them tubeless.I have aNT so that is my favorite,reasonable weight and seat height,50 mpg,sport tourer great wind protection.I like the looks of the nt best but all are great bikes.
If you are looking for casual riding with two up comfort, the Convert is probably the better option. Drive it like a big scooter as one member on this forum suggested. Very relaxed feel going down the road but still handles great as do all the early Tonti's.The SP has a more sporty drivers position, lower handlebar, and more rear set drivers footpegs along with higher passenger footpegs. It has a more sporty feel through the curves.The same comfortable seat or handlebars will work on either and can be had through MG Cycle or the want ads so seat height remains essentially the same if a flat seat is what you seek. Same basic platform with a very different feel.For reference I have a1978 Convert with lower handlebars and a SP upper fairing along with a 1980 SP. The Convert is my most comfortable ride of the 5 Moto Guzzi's I own with the SP being the next most comfortable.I believe your other questions were addressed quite accurately.
I have the upper SP fairing on my T-3 and with lower handlebars and it works very well and looks good on it. Just don't ruin a turn signal in the fairing. Very difficult to fine a replacement. GliderJohn
Sorry for the rather crowded garage!
If I remember correctly, there was initially the SP, with a thin, flat seat and some quality issues. A year later, the NT (new type) came out, better made and with the Covert seat. The SP2 had a 16in front wheel, but perhaps it was later chaned to an 18in, just like the LM4? The SP2 looks like it was based on the T4. The SP3 looks like a different bike, although it does not differ that much mechanically.
good thread (for me at least)I have a Convert waiting in the winds for a restore. so this has been a good read.What year did the problematic hex drive go away ?i think mine is a '76
I had a '79 SP as my second Guzzi. Yes, the seat was a bit narrow, flat and not all that comfortable, but there were no "quality issues" (any more than other Guzzis of the period). The SP2 shared bodywork with the T5 and did have a 16" front wheel. Not very popular here compared to the original SP. The SP3 was based on the 1000 Strada.