New 20 ounce tumblers available now! Forum donation credit with purchase. https://www.wildguzzi.com/Products/products.htm#Tumbler
If the company gets back on its feet, I hope they can make a bike that people actually want to buy.
I don't see where anyone suggested the EBR iteration of Eric's ventures used an HD mill.Unless you're saying Mayor BbqS question which I guess implied he didn't realize about the Rotax motors.
I've don't really 'get' buell bikes but I am curious...
OK, you Buell dudes! Help me out. Was it an S3 or ST3 that was a tube frame that came from the factory with bags, ready to sport tour? I was so taken with the appearance of that bike ..... unfortunately (maybe fortunately) I let a then-current owner talk me out of buying one. Problem he had was regular fracturing of the exhaust headers, to the point (per him) Buell would not replace the final breakage, even though the bike was still under warranty.Never owned one, never ridden one, always fascinated with the concept of a pumped up Sportster engine in a sportier chassis.Bob
S3TThat's the one I sold earlier this year.With race ECM and Buell branded supertrap it was pushing 100 rwhp, and felt pretty similar to a Griso.It was remarkably well balanced and really meant for curves, plus had a large fuel tank. There were also less than 200 made that year (2001). And it had the charm and feel of a low production, basically hand built bike.
Seems like we were all at the Park City AHRMA national . I also test rode a Buell . Dusty
The original S3T (1997) actually had stock fairing lowers in addition to the hard bags and half-fairing present on Kev's bike. I owned one for 3 three years; great motor, wonderful handling, but sooooo many problems: shock recall, hard bags leaked and locks failed, tail light assembly rattled off the bike at speed, lower fairing vibrated apart after a few thousand miles, speedo failed early, many other little issues. However, I liked the bike enough to buy a 2000 S3 (same as S3T but no hard bags and fairing lowers): much improved over the 97, but still had some problems. They finally got the tubers right near the end of their production in 2002.Jon
- When they were on their own, EBR, they seemed to focus too heavily on superbikes, which were expensive and had too few paying customers.
- If they want to be a viable motorcycle company, they need to research what the riding public wants and make bikes that fit into that result. Competitively priced standards, sports, sport-touring, and touring bikes that are reliable, low maintenance (regular gas, readily available oil/filter, tire size, and replacement parts), with a decent dealer network, is the ticket to success. Note, the American cruiser market is saturated with good bikes now, no need to go there.- Don't take to long, as Victory might be ready to jump in that pool and make a big splash.