New 20 ounce tumblers available now! Forum donation credit with purchase. https://www.wildguzzi.com/Products/products.htm#Tumbler
I've owned both and what Rocker said is true. The Norge is a touring bike that handles well but the Rosso is the bike for the Dragon. That said, I have done some extensive touring on the Rosso - but it's not as comfortable Norge in that respect.
What kind of fuel mileage did you see from yours?
...you should ride both before you decide.
MG,you should ride both before you decide. I have a 2007 Norge and a 2004 V11 Coppa Italia. I disagree with R59 and and feel that the Norge when fitted with the proper suspension is a better sport tourer then the V11.
As far as being heavy, after you add bags on the V11 it will weight almost as much as the Norge.
As always, good advice. One of my underlying questions (being a suspicious creature) was whether the two bikes really handled that much differently or were they (as much as anything) a form factor (packaging) difference? More than one manufacturer takes essentially the same product and modifies it primarily through styling to create different models. That's not bad or cheating....just like to know what I'm spending my money on. Clearly, luggage affects handling - talking about the underlying machine.
"Better"? at what? in what ways?There is more than 50 lbs difference in the two bikes. Probably close to 100 lbs. And, for some reason, you really "feel it" on the Norge.
Nearing the end of long-day riding season here in Colorado, so I finally had a little time for a belated comparison post:As they say, "your mileage may vary", but here is my comparison (with pics) of the two Guzzi's I own. I may update this over time, but here is the first cut. But first, a caveat, I am NOT a Guzzi historian.....I first "pined" for a Guzzi in the late 90's...when a green V11 Sport caught my eye, but didn't own my first Guzzi until just a few years ago, and now I own two...a 2003 V11 Lemans Rosso Corsa and a 2008 1200 Sport. They are not really bikes most would normally cross-shop, but of course since the Guzzi market is so thin, hardy anyone shops a Guzzi at all, so what the hell...here goes.........Overview:In relative terms, both my Guzzi's are "newer"....one a 2003 and the other 2008...one a spine frame, and the other a CARC model.....one built during the Aprilia ownership years, one during the Piaggio ownership years. While there are Guzzis much older than mine, and now ones that are newer, the difference between my two bikes still makes me feel like I have one older Guzzi and one newer Guzzi.Engine/Power: TiePowerwise, there isn't allot of power difference between the two. I have not put these bikes on a dyno, but my butt-dyno suggests my breathed-on (Guzzi-Tech air/fuel/pipe) 1200 makes a little more power across the band, but my V11 has plenty and winds really nice. Either probably makes only mid 70's to 80 rwhp, so who cares, these are Guzzi's after all and either have plenty of power (and torque) to thrust through the twisties. Both of these bikes are of the 2V era, and while the newer 8V Guzzis make more power, I can't imagine more hp would make my rides on either of these bikes more enjoyable.....I own / have owned bikes that puts down much more power than any 8V Guzzi, so its not that I don't appreciate power. Sound-wise, I give the edge to the stereo sound twin-carbon (M4) V11 versus the mono-(Guzzi-Tech Leo Vince) 1200 Sport, but both sound like butter.Handling/Suspension: Advantage V11 LemansOK, so mine is a Rosso Corsa version of the V11 Lemans, which has the high quality Ohlins suspension which isn't really fair to compare against the stock Marzocchi forks/shock on the 1200 Sport, but that said, I suspect a regular V11 Lemans is still going to handle better than a 1200 Sport due to overall chassis geometry/lower center of gravity. While both bikes weigh within about 5 lbs of each other per the spec sheets, the V11 carries its weight lower in a more traditional sport-bike geometry, whereas the 1200 Sport is a taller more relaxed bike, more akin to a naked sport touring bike. However, both handle very well for anything you are going to do off a race-track, so I say, while I can ride the V11 faster, I can ride the 1200 Sport fast longer. For all-around riding, the 1200 Sport is more compliant and comfortable.Ergonomics: Advantage 1200 SportThe 1200 Sport shares the basic platform with other Breva/Norge variants, and is a very comfortable and versatile platform. With a tubular bar, its easy to choose your stance, plus the saddle and suspension is good for day-long comfort. The V11 Lemans is more traditional sport-bike with clip-on bars, long reach and short saddle to peg distance. I find the V11 comfortable as sport stances go, but I find myself grabbing the keys to the most comfortable bike more often, and that is the 1200 Sport.Versatility/Practicality: Advantage 1200 SportBased upon the Norge platform, the 1200 Sport has/can add factory hard luggage, tail racks/packs, heated grips, 6 gallon fuel tank, trip computer, etc. combined with more comfortable upright ergos make it more practical for more uses than the V11 Lemans. The V11 has more committed ergos, that are in their element on shorter rides in curvy terrain. Yes, you can commute or tour on a V11, but it is not the bike's natural element. One other point, the 1200 Sport gets much better gas mileage....low 50's here in the thin air of Colorado, while the V11 gets just high thirties and the odd 40 every now and then.Visual Appeal: Advantage V11 LemansThis is obviously subjective, but the V11 is more eye candy to me than the 1200 Sport. The V11 has a more classic sport bike proportions to it, and the Rosso Corsa paint scheme is beautiful. The 1200 Sport is more brutish in appearance, but is very unique to what you see on the road. Interestingly, I get more questions about the 1200 Sport, perhaps because as a "standard" it doesn't look like either a "Harley" or a "Crotch Rocket", whereas the V11 look similar to other sport bikes if you don't know motorcycles at all.Conclusion: Both very nice bikes, not that comparableIf I could have only one bike, the 1200 Sport could do almost anything you wanted, you could commute on it, ride it down rough dirt roads, do sport rides in the curves, or take it touring across country. It's that good and versatile. By being a jack-of-all-trades, it will never beat more purpose mission bikes in any of those categories. The V11 Lemans, while not comparable to a modern sport bike, is none-the-less a more sporting experience as compared to the 1200 Sport, and as such is more involving to ride in attack mode on curvy roads. It lacks the versatility, and modern amenities of the 1200 Sport, but manages to be more mechanical and visceral in riding experience. I would have more fun on a date with the V11, but the 1200 Sport I could take home to mom. Hopefully, I will be able to keep both as long as I can.
More "flickable". Better mileage. More comfortable. Better weather protection. Better brakes.
Michael,You stated your opinion. I did not say that you were wrong, I just don't agree with it. And again, based on my experience with both bikes, I feel that my Norge, as I have equipped it, is a better sport touring motorcycle then my V11. The V11 is a very nice Sunday bike, the Norge is a very good weekend bike.Nick
V11 Rosso Corsa is prettier. ****
****....so here is the deal....you can argue, (but you would be wrong ).....a Norge handles pretty good, but no way, no how a Norge handles as well as a V11 Lemans. ****
OK, I'll take a swing. This reminds me of the "War Is Not the Answer" bumper stickers. Doesn't it depend on the question? Seriously, while I suppose there is some objective standard for "handle," even that involves lots of "it depends" WRT what sort of riding one does.I love the RC, and -- while I have not ridden one (darn it) -- have ridden "plain jane" LeMans and put over 20K on my Ballabio that sure was quicker in turns because of its bars than the LeMans I rode. But "handling?" IMO, a motorcycle that requires, because of its wheelbase and short bars, significant effort to manhandle it through tight stuff is no dream to "handle," and certainly isn't "flickable." My Norge falls without effort into turns of all kinds, whether 100 mph sweepers (that I take at lower speeds! ), whiskbroom tighter ones, and even switchbacks (which I loathe).So, for me at least, the Norge may weigh more but dances through the back roads like a much slimmer partner. Yes, I have serious mods to front and rear suspension, and think that necessary on firstgen Norges unless one has a jockey sort of physique.This is, I suppose, just one of those things that -- no objective standard being applicable -- is unanswerable except to ourselves.In the meantime, I'll just ride and grin.I'm doing this tomorrow, two-up with Kathi, on the Norge. https://goo.gl/maps/noh7PSzi2FwWould enjoy it on a Rosso Corsa, too, but one isn't in my harem ... yet. Bill