New 20 ounce tumblers available now! Forum donation credit with purchase. https://www.wildguzzi.com/Products/products.htm#Tumbler
If anyone thinks they are going to save money in the long run by buying a EV maybe seeing a good mathematician may be in order.
Most electric cars depreciate much more than the average car. On a percentage basis, non-Tesla EVs depreciate at an almost unbelievable rate - 60-70% in the first two years versus 30% for conventional cars. For example the little Fiats lose value at over $500 per month for the first two years. Teslas are better on a percentage basis, but because they are so expensive they are still costly to own in terms of dollar value lost per month - in the range of $300-350 monthly depreciation. https://www.greencarreports.com/news/1123583_beyond-tesla-electric-cars-lose-value-faster-than-other-vehicleshttps://www.carfax.com/blog/car-depreciationOf course the flip side to this is that if you're a used car buyer, an EV might be a good deal if you don't need the same utility as others who are avoiding buying them and in doing so pushing down their market value.
Dusty, or someone said it, “this is one of the stupidest threads ever “Who saw anti-biotechs coming?
I don't even know what an anti-biotech IS, so it must not be having a horse/automobile impact on our lives.The combined thread is 5 years old this month, and I don't see any differences yet .....Lannis
Yea you are right about the charging time thing buy I’m afraid that time limit you suggested is several years away. Also I’m not aware of any EV with a 300 mile range but admit there could be one. Can you offer further?
Range and cost are definitely factors. But I actually think the range argument is WAY overblown (not overblown for everyone of course, but for literally tens of millions of families). Case in point, like literally 99% of the 100's of homes home in my suburban-ish neighborhood, my wife and I have 2 cars. It used to be 2 ICE cars, a Toyota Highlander and a Mazda3. Now it's the Highlander and an electric Chevy Bolt. Since we have purchased the Bolt, the Highlander's annual mileage has dropped by more than half. We both like driving the Bolt way better than either the Highlander or the previous Mazda3 and only use the Highlander when we need to (long trip, pull a trailer, haul a bunch of stuff or people). It rarely gets used, and sometimes sits in the garage for weeks without being touched. The Bolt has a range of 240 miles, and the times when that isn't adequate are very rare, just a handful of times a year. I never even consider trying to charge the Bolt unless at home because the need for that just isn't there. It charges overnight, and in reality, that takes me about 10 seconds, 5 to plug it in and 5 to unplug it. On the rare occasions where we have a longer trip we can take the other car. Now of course, my circumstances aren't the same as everyone. But my point is, having lived in suburbia for much of my life, I know there are many millions of people who's needs could met by a modern EV (people who don't already own one).The biggest barriers seems to be cost, which is totally legit at this point, and range, which I think is mostly an imaginary problem for many many people.
I've not read beyond the headline, I'll leave it to Lannis to poo poo it. Tesla 370 mile range.https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/24/18513899/tesla-model-s-x-range-upgrade-270-325-miles-supercharger-200kw
Sure. Not to disappoint you, you understand."EV range" is the new "Horsepower Ratings". Independent tests dyno'ed bike horsepower at the rear wheel - manufacturers and shills took it at the piston crown, apparently. As always, we'll see.Lannis
Just trying to keep some of the things in this thread reality based. EV range is definitely NOT the new horsepower rating. EV Range is based on an EPA test, and manufacturers don't just get to claim it, same as mpg ratings for ICE vehicles.
Most of the ranges I've seen to date (if they even publish one) are manufacturers and magazine testers claims, not some sort of official "EPA" rating. Not to mention that I've never found "EPA" mileage ratings to be particularly accurate in the real world. The State of California knows that these vehicles cause cancer and reproductive harm, like my computer mouse, so I have great confidence in them.But once enough of them get on the road to get some real data, and not just magazine articles, we'll see.
I have no quibble with your data, but it is very misleading because it ignores the tax incentives (like them or not, not wanting to debate that, just pointing out they exist). Pretty much any used EV on the market will have depreciated an extra $7500 (or much more in some states) due to the tax incentive that the original purchaser received and a used buyer is not eligible for. For example, in Colorado that $500 per month over the first 2 years depreciation you cite would net to $0 depreciation for the original purchaser, who would have received the full depreciation amount in state and federal tax credits.
I was looking to buy a zero dual sport a while ago and then I found out that I will pay more for one in Tennessee than any other state because there are no incentives. On principal I will not pay more for something than someone else pays.
By incentives do you mean a price reduction because of gov't money? Or does the manufactuer just gove a discount?
I'm sold on the convenience, user-friendliness, economy and low maintenance of EVs. If we still lived in the city and had to commute, I'd have an e-car. Of course it's entirely impractical for trips, including my frequent ski travel. Hence the Subaru and AWD van in the family.
And yet you don't own one, despite their universal availability.
When the Subaru wears out (250,000 miles from now) we'll acquire a used EV, though we'll need AWD because of the steep snowy road onto our mesa (we'd have one now except I spend a lot of money on the motorcycle herd). Several of our neighbors do own EVs -- they're great for the two-mile trip into town.....
Ok guys, we naysayers are in check. Here is the new EV Ford F-150 that is yo he released in two years. You know when the Ford F-150 goes slot car our beloved internal combustion engine is history🥵 lol I love this forum, it’s better than watching my grandkids fuss:)
At work, over half our fork truck fleet has gone electric from propane. As we replace them when they wear out, they will be replaced by electric. Cost per hour for electric is much less according to our maintenance departments spreadsheets. They track purchase price, maintenance costs and fuel consumption, along with down time. Operators also prefer them over the IC propane trucks.