Wildguzzi.com
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: dilligaf on January 04, 2015, 09:52:20 AM
-
This pass September on a ride to New England with my son in law I experience sever back pain when I stepped just wrong at a state park in Vermont. I was riding the K75S and while riding, the pain was greatly reduced in fact, four days later the pain was gone. ;D
Early November the pain returned with a vengeance. I could hardly walk but, with great effort I could get on my motorcycles. While riding, the pain was greatly reduced. The diagnosis is spinal stenosis. I told the doctor about the motorcycle and, once she understood it was a sport bike, she agreed that riding a motorcycle would be beneficial. Leaning forward relieves the pressure on the nerves that are being pinched by the spine.
I switched from cruisers to sport bikes about 1980 and never looked back. I have preached, often to no avail, that an upright cruiser type motorcycle is not a good choose, both from a handling and health point of view. I understood the handling but never understood the health thing. I just knew that at the end of the day I preferred a sport bike to a cruiser. This is what I found on the web and it supports the doctor's statement.
Patients are typically more comfortable while flexed forward. Examples of activity modification for treatment of spinal stenosis might include: walking while bent over and leaning on a walker or shopping cart instead of walking upright; stationary biking (leaning forward on the handlebars) instead of walking for exercise; sitting in a recliner instead of on a straight-back chair.
So......for you stenosis suffers, is there a sport bike in your future. :BEER:
Matt
-
Another reason not to sell my V11 SPORT ;-T
-
Looks like it only effects 8-11% of the population, so I'm thinking claiming there's a general health disadvantage to an upright motorcycle might be more than a bit of a stretch.
-
Not a stretch for me. Right now getting on and off is my primary problem. ::( Once on I can ride pain free for hours. ;-T I suspect riding a cruiser where you depend on a back rest to reduce spinal compression may work. I wouldn't know as I have never ridden that type of motorcycle.
The problem with relying on a motorcycle to relieve the pain is that-sooner or later-you have go get off the SOB. :( :BEER:
Matt
-
I'm most comfy on my dual sport sitting position, not so far foreward so I don't have keep my head held back like I'm looking up all the time. I also enjoy my field of view better. I can see over SUV's Just me<shrug>
-
My father suffered for nearly 20 years from Spinal Stenosis. The doctors told him it was from arthritis of the spine from his x-rays. He would get the usual leg pains then shooting pains across his chest as the "choking" moved up his spine. Even though he was a gifted athlete when he was young his lifestyle of stress, smoking, drinking and lack of exercise did a lot of damage. He had to stop working due to the disability at age 55 or so. He died more than a decade earlier than his father and grandfather. His treatment was a couple of decades of drugs and only when he saw God up close and personal did he start walking two hours a day. This gave him 10 more years of difficult but acceptable life.
My brother has it and I know that I have it.
I attribute my ability to function at age 60 from 45 years of riding a bicycles with drop bars including week long tours, mountain passes, some commuting and mountain bike racing. A decade of racing single sculls in my 30's also helped.
This last decade of only work activity and 30+ years of not having a motorcycle, another story, I decided it was time to get back into motorcycles and took the Motorcycle Safety Riding Course. It was amazing how much better my back felt after riding a motorcycle. Six months ago I bought my Griso and it has helped my back immensely.
I agree with your "sporting position" helping those of us with back problems along. I actually find the "sport" position to be very upright compared to my old Cafe bike with clip-ons. The drop bars of a road racing bicycle are lower and a track bicycle is much lower still. The Griso is more like a Downhill or jumping Mountain bike.
More older people should ride motorcycles as physical therapy, it would really help them. Unfortunately here in California I see a preponderance of "ape hangers".
-
I see the original poster's point: on a sport bike, bumps are absorbed by the rider's legs, whereas on a cruiser those bumps travel right up the spine. On the other hand--no pun intended--a sport bike puts my weight on my forearms and wrists that I find uncomfortable and numbing, even when I was younger.
-
If memory serves, I think Cycle magazine from the 70's reported on this. Your spine is best when slightly curved as in a forward lean. Try not to stiff arm and use your lower back muscles for support. Cruisers have always been uncomfortable for me.
Last August I had severe lower back spasms related to crash damage in January. Two days in agony and another month of therapy with no ability to ride. An Inversion Table and exercise have me good as new. Also try some Calcium/Magnesium supplements with Valerian Root. Valerian really is the Bee's Knees for relaxation.
-
a sport bike puts my weight on my forearms and wrists that I find uncomfortable and numbing, even when I was younger.
Hands going numb is a common problem of road bicycle riders, it usually comes from them not changing hand positions enough while riding and from not having enough tricep strength to support part of their weight with their arms bent.
I also have the numb hand problem with my Griso but have found opening up my grip, having the inside of my knuckles and the open palm on the throttle along with a cramp buster paddle to really help. I had the same problem with mountain bicycle handlebars.
My problem is without "spinning my legs" like on a bicycle I have to get off and walk a bit every 90 minutes or so.
-
I have had back problems since I was 15 with it getting worse as the years go by. I switched from Harleys with the upright position, to sport bikes in 1998 due to the pain limiting my miles per day plus the Ducati's I owned were WAY more fun. I still couldn't do the 400-500 miles a day I did when I was younger but again WAY more fun. Then I got my B1100 and started doing 350 mile days on it plus it was WAY more fun than the Harleys... perfect. Last year the pain got worse when riding and I put on fewer miles total for the year with only a couple days over 200 miles. I have 3 conditions with my back, 2 vertebrate out of alignment, bulging disc's and narrow passages for the nerves to pass thru. I had made up my mind to get surgery than I considered going back to an upright riding position after my pain management doc told me leaning forward will worsen the pain. So I got to doing research on cheaper touring bikes that had comfort as their biggest asset. After sitting on a few bikes the 2 bikes that seemed to fit me were the California 1400 and the Kawasaki Vulcan Nomad 1700. I wanted to keep the Breva and Griso Tenni so I had to go with a 2010 Nomad do to the difference in cost between it and the Cali. The Nomad I have only has 4500 miles on it with a backrest, luggage rack and front spotlights. It's wired for a gps and brake light flasher too. I paid $8700 out the door for it and it was local. So far it has been much better on my hips and knees and to a lesser degree my lower back but I plan on trying longer trips this year, maybe a 400 mile day. The moral of the story is everybody's body is different and will respond to different remedy's , this may not work for me in the long run and I could still need surgery to ride farther. Only time will tell. One thing is ,the Nomad is slow, drags to easy and has too much chrome compared to the Guzzi's but it may have the best seat I ever used and the rear suspension is plush.
-
I'm certainly in full agreement.
Even before having any age/trauma related back issues - sport served me best.
The least comfortable motorcycles I've owned for any distance riding:
Harley Super-Glide
Norton Interstate
Honda Valkyrie
and
"Oh yes he did!".... That torture rack of a Moto Guzzi Calvin.
The absolute most comfortable - around town and interstate for days:
1982 Suziki Katana
1995 Guzzi Sport 1100
Any of the many Suzuki GSs I've flaked into GS1000S "Wes Cooley-esque" ergos
BMW R65LS
Even now, closer to 60 than 40, I like the lean. Probably why my stumpy Sportster continually steals miles and smiles from the Calvin.
Todd.
-
I bought a cruiser 17 years ago in an exceptional fit of bad judgement. ::) The first time I took it down our frost heaved road, I thought, " Crap, I have to get rid of this POS. There went 5K down the drain.." I'd never had a back problem in my life until I rode that cruiser..
-
I suspect I lost more that a few sales when I would try to convince a prospect customer that an "S" or "RS" was a better choose than an "RT". One of the most miserable rides I ever had was from Charleston, SC to Tampa, FL or an RT. I hurt so bad I actually went to a doctor. It doesn't help things when the owner of the BMW dealership hates an "RT". ;D To this day I refuse to ride an RT however, I found a California II to be a very good handling motorcycle and quite comfortable. Da. The conversion from cruiser to sport bike was not without pain but I had no choice. The first demo motorcycle provided by BMW was an RS. I road that thing everyday, about 60 miles round trip, and did I hurt. Numb hands and a sharp pain between the shoulder blades that slowly went away. I would draw little stick diagrams in an attempt to explain to a customer why they should chose the sport bike. Even the mechanics and my son would laugh at me. Christmas I gave my son a K75C for Christmas. Tuesday he coming here to service the bike and replace the handle bars with some "S" bars I happen to have. ;D
About my GS experience's: I road a F650GS to Tampa to visit my brother and found that motorcycle to be very uncomfortable. Great little round town bike but I sure wouldn't ride it to Alaska. Replacing the handlebars with "S" bars helped. I traded that bike to my daughter for a 1999 Ducati ST2. I have no problem with my R100GS. Little different seat and a little different riding position. :BEER:
Matt
-
Not a stretch for me. Right now getting on and off is my primary problem. ::(
Not doubting it's applicability to you or 8-11% of the population. It just sounded like you were preaching that as a general truth.
-
I have a herniated disc and must do cervical traction at least once a day or suffer pain in my elbow and tingling in my fingers. Except, when I'm away on weekend trip on the motorcycle. At first, if I attended a rally, I'd take my traction rig with me and "stretch" myself each night back at the motel. But then one weekend trip, I forgot it, but still experienced no pain or tingling. So, I haven't packed it since.
I do find that the Ambassador is the best "mobile traction unit" - just enough forward lean with stock (civilian) handlebars, dual seat and pegs. The MZ's 'bars are just a bit too low, pegs too high and a 300 mile day leaves me aching a bit. The XT500 has a good riding position, but the vibration beats me to death on the highway, still no elbow ache or tingling.
It'll be interesting to see how I feel after long days of riding the Elefant and Paso.
-
I see the original poster's point: on a sport bike, bumps are absorbed by the rider's legs, whereas on a cruiser those bumps travel right up the spine. On the other hand--no pun intended--a sport bike puts my weight on my forearms and wrists that I find uncomfortable and numbing, even when I was younger.
I thought bumps were absorbed by a good suspension.
Obviously 30+ years of sportbikes didn't prevent the OP from developing SS.
-
I never could get as comfortable on my RS or Breva add I could an RK or RT.
-
I thought bumps were absorbed by a good suspension.
Obviously 30+ years of sportbikes didn't prevent the OP from developing SS.
Nop, it didn't. From what I have read most start to develop SS in their late 50ies early 60ies. I'm 75. The mechanic who laughed road Sportsters. The last I saw him he was in a wheelchair. I don't know why and didn't ask. Most likely had nothing to do with the motorcycle. Be kind of cool if someone could do a study. :BEER:
Matt
-
Over the summer I did something to my back and it was hell. Turn the wrong way and it felt like a knife was in my lower back. Went to the chiropractor who also rides and he was in total agreement that riding position helps relieve the pressure. What I did find that sitting in a car/truck was miserable but on any of my bikes I was fine....once I got on them. In a car seat you are pretty well immobilized a bike you can move around.
-
Leaning forward sure helps me. Feet forward cruisers cause lots of lower back pain.
I can ride bikes like the V11 LeMans and Sport 1100 all day long with no back problems.
At highway speeds, the weight on the hands/arms is no big deal. At lower speeds, using legs and abs takes the weight off the hands.
-
I also suffer from knee problems that(I'm like an old car starting to fall apart), so far, I have dealt with Celebrex and exercise. When I get out of my truck I have to walk, hobble, about 20+ feet just to get my knees moving. This is not the case with my motorcycles. I can sit on them for hours on end and get off an move around with out any problems. All this may be anecdotal but as far as I am concern it's a fact. Think about it. I know a few folks that are older than I that also ride some long distances but not all that many and the ones I know all ride sport bikes. :BEER:
Matt
-
I can totally see why it works for some. Me, I'm in relatively good shape, still run 5k and train in karate on a pretty regular basis. Still have all my flexibility and most of my speed. But riding positions like the Breva, RS, Ducati etc. Cause my knees to cramp sometimes not till after 200 miles, sometimes after only 50 or so.
Something more upright usually let's me move my leg positions more and/or stretch them out more.
Either way the less sharp bend (only about 90°) keeps my knees from cramping.
It's also more comfortable on my neck being more upright.
-
All this may be anecdotal but as far as I am concern it's a fact. Think about it. I know a few folks that are older than I that also ride some long distances but not all that many and the ones I know all ride sport bikes. :BEER:
Matt
No, it's a self-selecting bias because of whom you tend to befriend (people who share your tastes).
Most of the old bikers I know ride Harleys, cruisers, or touring bikes.
That includes an old friend who is about your age, needs DOUBLE knee replacements, and continues to ride a Road King.
-
Some body has to ask, let it be me. Will your doctor write a prescription for a sport bike? I have always been told that without my health, nothing else matters.
-
Most of the old bikers I know ride Harleys, cruisers, or touring bikes.
My two main riding buddies (70 and 80 yrs. old) both have other type of bikes, but tend to ride their dual-sport/adventure bikes most because that's what is the most comfortable for them.
-
Guess I'm saying we each see more on the types of bikes we ride or are interested in because that's who we socialize with.
-
Interesting the differences in comfort levels on various bikes. I like sitting straight up and feel that it promotes good posture since I'm more comfortable with a straight back/spine. My limiting factor in long rides is my arse which tends to go to sleep after a while - which I think a $ custom seat $ would take care of. My longest ride was about 1600 miles non-stop, and my back didn't suffer one bit, but a short ride on a friend's Griso about did me in. I can't tolerate the forward lean even for a short distance ???
Different strokes for different folks I guess ;)
-
Sitting more or less straight up and down has never been a problem for me, even now at 65, although I'll freely admit to being fairly fit and flexible and not overweight. What I can't abide in a 'cruiser' is not the straight-up seating position, it's having my feet ahead of my butt. Last real sport-bike I rode was a BMW S1000RR, which damn near killed me. In more ways than one :D
-
This pass September on a ride to New England with my son in law I experience sever back pain when I stepped just wrong at a state park in Vermont. I was riding the K75S and while riding, the pain was greatly reduced in fact, four days later the pain was gone. ;D
Early November the pain returned with a vengeance. I could hardly walk but, with great effort I could get on my motorcycles. While riding, the pain was greatly reduced. The diagnosis is spinal stenosis. I told the doctor about the motorcycle and, once she understood it was a sport bike, she agreed that riding a motorcycle would be beneficial. Leaning forward relieves the pressure on the nerves that are being pinched by the spine.
I switched from cruisers to sport bikes about 1980 and never looked back. I have preached, often to no avail, that an upright cruiser type motorcycle is not a good choose, both from a handling and health point of view. I understood the handling but never understood the health thing. I just knew that at the end of the day I preferred a sport bike to a cruiser. This is what I found on the web and it supports the doctor's statement.
Patients are typically more comfortable while flexed forward. Examples of activity modification for treatment of spinal stenosis might include: walking while bent over and leaning on a walker or shopping cart instead of walking upright; stationary biking (leaning forward on the handlebars) instead of walking for exercise; sitting in a recliner instead of on a straight-back chair.
So......for you stenosis suffers, is there a sport bike in your future. :BEER:
Matt
Your stenosis is relieved when you flex your spine hence riding a sport bike feels better. But the person next to you could have stenosis (or a bulging disc) in a different area and have their condition be aggravated by the sporting/flexed position: hence they need to get into lower back (lumbar) extension: a more upright position. Any article that says flexion relieves all stenosis is false and misleading. Classical presentation of stenosis is relieved by flexion but stenosis can occur in different areas of the spine and present with different symptoms. Additionally a bulging disk can produce identical symptoms to stenosis. Mechanically speaking both conditions are doing the same thing: compressing nerve roots. It is all a matter of which nerve roots that are compressed that determines whether extension or flexion is better or worse for the individual. The best diagnostic tool is an MRI. But in any case spinal stenosis is NOT exclusively aggravated by sitting upright.
I have made many back braces and fit many corsets over the years and see relief in both extension and flexion. As for me I have never been able to ride a bike without a wearing a short corset. As for sport bike forget it. 30 minutes on one and I am a freaking pretzel.
-
My two main riding buddies (70 and 80 yrs. old) both have other type of bikes, but tend to ride their dual-sport/adventure bikes most because that's what is the most comfortable for them.
I would fall into this category. I've ridden all of the various types except the pure cruisers (I'm not comfortable on them even "test sitting" in a show room) but have ended up preferring the AdvTouring types. For me, it's the more upright seating position (although on my Stelvio I'm still slightly leaned over), a reasonable distance between the seat and the foot pegs (so my legs/knees are not so tightly bent) and that my feet are almost directly under me. Also a probable factor is that AdvTouring bikes normally have more suspension travel which does a better job of absorbing the bumps, rather than feeding them into my body through my back.
-
Your stenosis is relieved when you flex your spine hence riding a sport bike feels better. But the person next to you could have stenosis (or a bulging disc) in a different area and have their condition be aggravated by the sporting/flexed position: hence they need to get into lower back (lumbar) extension: a more upright position.
Most folks I see in an upright position are in lumbar flexion. Cruisers definitely promote lumbar flexion.
Everyone is different-- glad some folks have found things that work.
-
I know I can do more miles a day, and more hours a day, on a sport bike provided I'm going fast enough to get some lift on my chest. Also, after an accident wherein my private parts dented a fuel tank, a sport bike was the most comfortable seat I could find.
-
In 2012 I had a four level fusion, (S1-T3). Spinal Stenosis was just one of the diagnosis'. I could ride my 98 EV okay, but the most comfortable bike was my 04 Ballabio. The Centys were good except for knee pain after a period of time. People at the prison, especially management, would ask how I could ride the bike to work, but not the car. They didn't believe that the bike was more comfortable. So I can agree with the OP that the forward lean can relieve spinal pain. As every human body is different, not every body responds the same to the same treatment, not everybody will have the same relief riding a forward lean bike.
-
Guess I'm saying we each see more on the types of bikes we ride or are interested in because that's who we socialize with.
In my case I do and ride what I WANT not what the guys at work do or ride or the neighbor does or rides. The marketing types are wasting their money on me because I have my own mind. That's why I ride alone too, my own speed on the roads I like and stop and start when I want. I always have a big grin too!
-
Loved my '97 1100 Sport i.
Above a certain speed, all was bliss. Below that, not so much.
I tend to be a "sight seer" on the bike, head on a swivel and all that(and good for survival :BEER:)
But working the head left and right, when in a sporting position at the lower speeds, brought me considerable neck pain.
It is the #1 reason I sold this bike.
My '71 R75/5 with short windshield was about perfect for hours-on-end travel.
~I would like more distance between seat and footpegs on my Ambassador...
-
I thought bumps were absorbed by a good suspension.
Sorry, but my California 1400 ain't a Sedan DeVille. And this is the midwest, where terrible roads are the rule.
-
Some body has to ask, let it be me. Will your doctor write a prescription for a sport bike? I have always been told that without my health, nothing else matters.
A doctor can write prescriptions all day long, doesn't mean any insurance will pay for it. Try taking your Rx to a motorcycle shop, I bet they don't do medicare billing ;D
-
In my case I do and ride what I WANT not what the guys at work do or ride or the neighbor does or rides. The marketing types are wasting their money on me because I have my own mind. That's why I ride alone too, my own speed on the roads I like and stop and start when I want. I always have a big grin too!
That's NOT what I said.
I'm saying that because of the bikes we are interested in we have, over the course of our lives, become friends with/acquaintances with more people of that similar taste than we would have otherwise.
That doesn't mean I wasn't the only guy at work riding a Harley instead of a BMW or the one guy that showed up at the Harley event on a Guzzi.
-
Sorry, but my California 1400 ain't a Sedan DeVille. And this is the midwest, where terrible roads are the rule.
Guess you should try a Harley. :-*
-
Just to clarify: Most of the bike mentioned, particularity the K750 from the OP, are sport standards -not full on sport bikes.
-
Just to clarify: Most of the bike mentioned, particularity the K750 from the OP, are sport standards -not full on sport bikes.
Oh! Thanks for clarifying that for us. ::) I have more miles on my LeMans than any bike I own. GMAFB. ::( OK ;D You don't get to be a members of the Couillon Cycliers just sitting around "dicking the dog" :BEER:
Matt
-
Interesting topic. I've found my K-RS to be very therapeutic to a stiff and sore lower back, which I have always attributed to its ergonomics (slight forward lean and rearward-biased footpegs). By contrast, my admittedly-cramped V7 Cafe Classic was misery due to its forward lean but mid-mount foot pegs. Bent over at the waist with no corresponding extension of the legs.
-
Define sport bike.
I do prefer the "European touring lean" over the cruiser and 'sport' bikes.
-
Looks like it only effects 8-11% of the population, so I'm thinking claiming there's a general health disadvantage to an upright motorcycle might be more than a bit of a stretch.
I have found that an upright position tends to jar the spine quite a bit and that things get far more comfortable when there is even a small amount of forward bend in the spine. (better control too) There are lower bars in the future for my EVT for that reason, when they reach the top of the priority list.
-
Most folks I see in an upright position are in lumbar flexion. Cruisers definitely promote lumbar flexion.
Everyone is different-- glad some folks have found things that work.
The more vertical one sits the more, the lumbar spine moves into extension/lordosis. But this is highly dependent on flexibility of the hamstrings and position of the knees and hips. Knee and hip position affect the pelvis and lumbar spine. The more forward controls on cruisers decreases knee flexion and increases hip extension which relaxes the hamstrings. This makes it easier to sit upright without torquing the pelvis. This effectively makes it easier to sit in lumbar flexion yet have a more vertical trunk. Overall height of the individual also comes into play here. A taller less flexible person has more difficultly achieving lumbar flexion on any given motorcycle than a shorter person more flexible person.
-
Funny, I was at the local Level 1 trauma center seeing an L1 burst and T12 compression when this came through. Seems we'll just have to agree to disagree.
The more vertical one sits the more, the lumbar spine moves into extension/lordosis. But this is highly dependent on flexibility of the hamstrings and position of the knees and hips. Knee and hip position affect the pelvis and lumbar spine. The more forward controls on cruisers decreases knee flexion and increases hip extension which relaxes the hamstrings. This makes it easier to sit upright without torquing the pelvis. This effectively makes it easier to sit in lumbar flexion yet have a more vertical trunk. Overall height of the individual also comes into play here. A taller less flexible person has more difficultly achieving lumbar flexion on any given motorcycle than a shorter person more flexible person.
The only people that I routinely see in anything close to extension are women and cops. I find it so remarkable that I, well, remark on it. The forward lean of a more sporting bike, IMO, doesn't promote extension so much as lengthening and decompression. It would be interesting to get some sagittal films of riders on various bikes.
-
I met another rider at work. Assigned together We both have Sciatica. He rides a CBR600R and I a Breva 1100 and Ducati ST 3. I have two hips and a knee replaced. Co worker is in his 30's. When the Sciatica hits, we both feel better on the bikes. In my case, the Ducati will hurt far less than the Guzzi because the pegs are set to the rear.
The first time I hurt my back was on a Yamaha dirt bike in the dirt. No one told me I should stand up. That bike had a perpendicular riding position.
-
Funny, I was at the local Level 1 trauma center seeing an L1 burst and T12 compression when this came through. Seems we'll just have to agree to disagree.
The only people that I routinely see in anything close to extension are women and cops. I find it so remarkable that I, well, remark on it. The forward lean of a more sporting bike, IMO, doesn't promote extension so much as lengthening and decompression. It would be interesting to get some sagittal films of riders on various bikes.
What anatomy of the body are you talking about when you say "IMO, doesn't promote extension so much as lengthening and decompression". If one side of the spine is lengthened and decompressed then the opposite side is shortened and compressed.
Here are 3 pictures of the same women on 3 different bikes. Clearly the sport bike puts her in excessive lumbar extension. This bike does not fit. There are many factors when looking at the ergonomics of an individual on a bike. But just raising the handlebars and moving them back a bit on the sport bike would reduce her forward lean angle and raise her off tank which would reduce lumbar extension. But one also has to look at foot control placement and seat height in relation to the foot controls.
(http://i1318.photobucket.com/albums/t652/redrider901/riding-position-sports_zpsbf951fd1.jpg)
[URL=http://s1318.photobucket.com/user/redrider901/media/riding-position-standard_zpsa4c43757.jpg.html](http://i1318.photobucket.com/albums/t652/redrider901/riding-position-standard_zpsa4c43757.jpg)
[URL=http://s1318.photobucket.com/user/redrider901/media/riding-position-cruiser_zps89672ad9.jpg.html](http://i1318.photobucket.com/albums/t652/redrider901/riding-position-cruiser_zps89672ad9.jpg) (http://s1318.photobucket.com/user/redrider901/media/riding-position-sports_zpsbf951fd1.jpg.html)
-
It all depends on where you have spinal stenosis. Mine is in C6-C7 and is the reason I've been fighting the suspension on my V7. It is especially painful on roads with bad expansion joints like are all over Iowa. I was about to call my wife to come get me on my way home from Elkader this summer.
I've also come to the conclusion that wind protection is part of my problem with the V7. I need to find some kind of windshield that works without turbulence.
-
I can commiserate. Riding my V7CC on the weathered concrete slab roadways of eastern Nebraska and western Iowa was torture. The constant pounding of the expansion joints made for a brutal ride.
-
When I went to pick up the Daytona 675 I stood and looked at it wondering why I thought I could ride what looked like a torture rack. Initially, there was some pain in my wrists for a few days but my back felt surprisingly good.
My Bassa is a very comfortable ride, ridden it non stop from Bama to NYC many times but I admit, it does cause some back pain. Would I attempt to ride the Daytona from Bama to NYC non stop...hell no but it is easier on the back than the Bassa.
-
Guess you should try a Harley. :-*
I have. IMHO not even in the same league as a Cali 1400. As for riding in the Midwest, I'm glad I don't have ride on those frost-heaved roads anymore.
Maybe its because I have short arms but I modestly lean forward on my Cali, so not exactly a 'sport bike' riding position, but not the laid back cruiser position either. I can't ride a sport bike very far because my neck doesn't flex like it used to. However, I do find the forward lean on many of my bikes a very comfortable riding position. I don't especially care for the forward controls on many cruisers as I like to stand up on the pegs during a long ride.
-
This pass September on a ride to New England with my son in law I experience sever back pain when I stepped just wrong at a state park in Vermont. I was riding the K75S and while riding, the pain was greatly reduced in fact, four days later the pain was gone. ;D
Early November the pain returned with a vengeance. I could hardly walk but, with great effort I could get on my motorcycles. While riding, the pain was greatly reduced. The diagnosis is spinal stenosis. I told the doctor about the motorcycle and, once she understood it was a sport bike, she agreed that riding a motorcycle would be beneficial. Leaning forward relieves the pressure on the nerves that are being pinched by the spine.
I switched from cruisers to sport bikes about 1980 and never looked back. I have preached, often to no avail, that an upright cruiser type motorcycle is not a good choose, both from a handling and health point of view. I understood the handling but never understood the health thing. I just knew that at the end of the day I preferred a sport bike to a cruiser. This is what I found on the web and it supports the doctor's statement.
Patients are typically more comfortable while flexed forward. Examples of activity modification for treatment of spinal stenosis might include: walking while bent over and leaning on a walker or shopping cart instead of walking upright; stationary biking (leaning forward on the handlebars) instead of walking for exercise; sitting in a recliner instead of on a straight-back chair.
So......for you stenosis suffers, is there a sport bike in your future. :BEER:
Matt
I have to believe some of this true. I've read it on so many motorcycle boards that I can't count; folks with bad backs who have found that sport or sport touring rides suit them more.
Some of you may not have back trouble, but having experienced these levels of pain will give you absolute insight into what works for you and what doesn't. I have 3 discs that have been reinjured probably 7 times in the last 8 years. It can be excruciating and paralyzing when injured. If you have lower disc injury, there's no amount of suspension in a motorcycle that can absorb all the bumps, potholes, etc. to a totally pleasing level if all the weight of your upper body is pushing down on that area while riding (cruiser, some standards). Like Matt, I have found the sport riding position better for me personally over the long haul. My Striple doesn't start off barka lounger comfortable like my wonderful Stone, but 3 hours later it's not any worse whereas my back on the Stone will start having a heated discussion with the rest of me by that time. Same with the Stelvio I used to own. Good suspension helped it but it still put most of my upper body weight directly upon my lower spine. The backrest on the Stone has helped somewhat since slumping makes the problem worse and rest kinda forces me not to do that.
Would I choose one over the other for my back rather than my personal preference of ride that day? Nah. When I go to the garage I still choose the ride I most want to spin that day but it does make a difference over the long haul. It's why I have avidly tried turning the Striple into a sport touring setup.
-
Some of you may not have back trouble, but having experienced these levels of pain will give you absolute insight into what works for you and what doesn't. I have 3 discs that have been reinjured probably 7 times in the last 8 years. It can be excruciating and paralyzing when injured. If you have lower disc injury, there's no amount of suspension in a motorcycle that can absorb all the bumps, potholes, etc. to a totally pleasing level if all the weight of your upper body is pushing down on that area while riding (cruiser, some standards). Good suspension helped it but it still put most of my upper body weight directly upon my lower spine. The backrest on the Stone has helped somewhat since slumping makes the problem worse and rest kinda forces me not to do that.
Lumbar sacral corsets unload the intervertebral disc spaces. A good fitting corset acts like on the spine by hydrostatic compression of abdominal soft tissue. This compression unloads some of the vertical/axial loading on the spinal column.
Anybody MCist with low back problems would benefit from a good fitting lumbar sacral corset. Given you presentation I would bet the farm you would receive some benefit wearing a corset.
-
Here are 3 pictures of the same women on 3 different bikes. Clearly the sport bike puts her in excessive lumbar extension. This bike does not fit. (http://i1318.photobucket.com/albums/t652/redrider901/riding-position-sports_zpsbf951fd1.jpg) (http://s1318.photobucket.com/user/redrider901/media/riding-position-sports_zpsbf951fd1.jpg.html)
I am not a physician or bio-mechanics expert just a common joe who has ridden a bicycle for many decades for ungodly hours per day on occasion. Proper Cycling "Form" has always been a big thing with me. For proper form I submit:
A picture of Zakelj in a climbing position.
(http://cdn.velonews.competitor.com/files/2013/05/women-1061.jpg)
A picture of Eva Lechner and Maya Wloszczowska descending on the same nasty course.
(http://cdn.velonews.competitor.com/files/2013/05/women-1141-704x440.jpg)
In cycling handlebar width is critical. From Looking at the proportion of the handlebar to these elite X-Country mountain bike racers it looks like your "monster" example has far to wide a handlebar that is forcing her into a wide "push-up" form. Shortening the bar on the Monster by 5 to 10 cm would also help her positioning.
I've always been very picky on the width of handlebars for each type of bicycle (track, road, cross, x-country mountain, downhill mountain) as one of the main elements of proper form.
Bar width as well as bar reach are necessary adjustments that most people don't seem to make on motorcycles. All of my bicycles have specific reach/width bars that also very by riding type and I have boxes of old bars/stems along with untold cut-offs of handlebars from making those changes.
Maybe riders should start having their motorcycles fitted.
-
Maybe riders should start having their motorcycles fitted.
I've always thought that would be a great idea .... that a company could sell a motorcycle that did not come standard with bars, pegs, or seat, and that those could be fitted to the customer based on his/her physiognomy.
But it's effectively what we do anyway. The vast majority of riders don't ride enough for the riding position to matter, and for those of us who DO ride enough for it to matter, the first thing we do is change the handlebars, seat, and peg mounts to make the bike fit us the way we know it needs to fit.
So it works out OK in the end. The manufacturers wouldn't want to fool with all that customizing anyway - too may variables and not enough customers who care.
Lannis
-
I've always thought that would be a great idea .... that a company could sell a motorcycle that did not come standard with bars, pegs, or seat, and that those could be fitted to the customer based on his/her physiognomy.
Do you need a wider bar when you grit your teeth vs when you smile? :D
-
Do you need a wider bar when you grit your teeth vs when you smile? :D
Good call ... but about down at definition (2) or (3) depending on the dictionary, it can mean "general appearance of" a person, place, or thing, and not just an assessment of character based on facial characteristics.
I could have used a better word, I'll admit.... :D
Apparently, apehangers put a "Bad" look on one's face, clip-ons a determined, aggressive look, but 1000SP bars are the ones for the friendly grin ....
Lannis
-
Gotta throw in my double coppers. At 55 years old I have a neck fusion and have had lower back surgery for stenosis. I currently own a Buell Uly, MG semi-cafe, Triumph scrambler (Meridan),and a BMW R 90. I used to race dirt bikes off road as well.
-The straight up sit down ride on any dirt bike didn't feel good. Standing, supporting my weight on my legs and leaning forward much better. Hurt my neck tho.
-Triumph- feet forward, high bars slightly leaned forward. To be comfortable I would put my feet on the back pegs, get my legs under me to cushion some of the bumps, lean forward a little. Good for 100 miles or so. Changing the seat height and footpegs.
-BMW- SLight lean forward on S bars feet back a little. Good posititon, seat sucks. I cry after 100 miles or so
-MG-modified Cal II- lean forward to low bars, pegs are below my ass. Feels pretty good except for my ass itself gets numb. Just made a new seat and raised the bars a little so I'm hopeful I've got it right.
-Buell- sportbike pegs, could be lower. Leaning forward is good. Seat isn't quite there stock or Corbin. 200-300 miles is it.
My personal conclusion
-Pegs under your butt allows you to support your body- forward pegs leave your back to be pounded according your suspension.
-Leaning forward helps- too much, like my old Aprilia and my wrists are in agony.
-Being able to move around helps a lot. Newer bikes tend to make you sit in one position.
-A back support as mentioned stretches your back and creates space between your vertebrae. Great off road for support and I wear one on longer road trips now. Sometimes the difference between a good ride and one from hell that leaves you unable to stand up.
I'm not a doctor but I play a deranged phlebotomist on TV so I have cred...
-
I have. IMHO not even in the same league as a Cali 1400. As for riding in the Midwest, I'm glad I don't have ride on those frost-heaved roads anymore.
Maybe its because I have short arms but I modestly lean forward on my Cali, so not exactly a 'sport bike' riding position, but not the laid back cruiser position either. I can't ride a sport bike very far because my neck doesn't flex like it used to. However, I do find the forward lean on many of my bikes a very comfortable riding position. I don't especially care for the forward controls on many cruisers as I like to stand up on the pegs during a long ride.
Hey I'm a fan of the Cali, but the current FLH series has an awesome suspension. Comfort should be no better on the Cali.
-
I am not a physician or bio-mechanics expert just a common joe who has ridden a bicycle for many decades for ungodly hours per day on occasion. Proper Cycling "Form" has always been a big thing with me. For proper form I submit:
A picture of Zakelj in a climbing position.
(http://cdn.velonews.competitor.com/files/2013/05/women-1061.jpg)
A picture of Eva Lechner and Maya Wloszczowska descending on the same nasty course.
(http://cdn.velonews.competitor.com/files/2013/05/women-1141-704x440.jpg)
In cycling handlebar width is critical. From Looking at the proportion of the handlebar to these elite X-Country mountain bike racers it looks like your "monster" example has far to wide a handlebar that is forcing her into a wide "push-up" form. Shortening the bar on the Monster by 5 to 10 cm would also help her positioning.
I've always been very picky on the width of handlebars for each type of bicycle (track, road, cross, x-country mountain, downhill mountain) as one of the main elements of proper form.
Bar width as well as bar reach are necessary adjustments that most people don't seem to make on motorcycles. All of my bicycles have specific reach/width bars that also very by riding type and I have boxes of old bars/stems along with untold cut-offs of handlebars from making those changes.
Maybe riders should start having their motorcycles fitted.
Riding a motorcycle and comparing it to mountain biking is apples and oranges. Motorcycling is an isometric activity: very little movement unless of course one is a racer. Otherwise most of us expend all our energy with our bodies pretty much locked into one position.
Those mountain bikes are set up to take advantage of the powerful foot/ankle, knee and hips muscles. It seems obvious the handlebar design has only one purpose and that is to provide maximum leverage so the rider has maximum input and control of the front end.
The poor sport rider suffers severely from leaning far to forward with her short body to reach the handle bars. The width of the bars, although important is 3rd behind the height and reach of the bar. Additionally this women has to reach so far forward that she has to hyperextend her lower back in order to keep her trunk off the tank (and I am not talking about her breasts as a guy could have the same issue). And the there is seat height which she would benefit from raising up to increase trunk clearance over the tank but then she may need to lower the suspension to get her feet on the ground. And on and on it goes. Peg placement height and forward/backward.