Wildguzzi.com
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: drlapo on January 22, 2015, 12:56:33 PM
-
I was rereading the Decmber 1989 issue of Classic Bike. they test a MG V7 Sport. they claim 52 bhp ( MG claimed 70bhp) and 500 pounds. top speed of 120mph
seat height 30"
wheel base 57.8"
my 13 V7 compares favorably with 2 less hp and 100 fewer pounds
Classic Bike liked the R90S a little better and declared the MG a better sporting machine
-
I thought the power claimed by MG (for both bikes) was for crankshaft horsepower, not rear-wheel horsepower. (the technique used by bike mags). A loss of 15% of an engine's crank hp (due to friction) is common with shaft-drive bikes...
-
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moto_Guzzi_V7_Sport
Often Magazines are wrong.... i remember when the stelvio came out , the mag were saying the stelvio was way heavier than the GS , but i remember few members/owner here prove that they were wrong .
http://www.motociclismo.it/gallery/epoca/motociclismo-depoca-di-febbraio-2015/motociclismo-depoca-di-febbraio-2015_10
-
I was rereading the Decmber 1989 issue of Classic Bike. they test a MG V7 Sport. they claim 52 bhp ( MG claimed 70bhp) and 500 pounds. top speed of 120mph
seat height 30"
wheel base 57.8"
my 13 V7 compares favorably with 2 less hp and 100 fewer pounds
Don't the newer V7s put out about 40-42 hp at the rear wheel? So, down about 10 hp and 15 mph or so top speed.
-
I've always been a bit dubious about the performance claims from that era . The Original V7 Sport cant have been much faster or quicker than a good R75/5 , maybe 107 mph .
Dusty
-
I've always been a bit dubious about the performance claims from that era . The Original V7 Sport cant have been much faster or quicker than a good R75/5 , maybe 107 mph .
Dusty
I can't say anything about the declared HP but i can tell for sure that the v7 sport was waay faster than the 75/5 ( i owned both ) and they are like night and day.
Regarding the max speed my V7 could reach easily the declared 200km/h.
-
I can't say anything about the declared HP but i can tell for sure that the v7 sport was waay faster than the 75/5 ( i owned both ) and they are like night and day.
Regarding the max speed my V7 could reach easily the declared 200km/h.
I am just going by personal experience . At one time in the early '80s , was part of a small riding group that included an R75/5 , a really nice low mileage V7 Sport , an 850 Commando , and my slightly modded '77 T140V . They all possessed almost identical performance , dunno .
Dusty
-
I have to admit i am biased when comparing guzzi with other bikes.... :) but the V7 120 mph declered were real
Never owned or ever ridden a british bike..tho.
-
(http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab53/arveno1/bikes/10945019_861241573938418_7246320111894320366_n_zpsfc281665.jpg) (http://s849.photobucket.com/user/arveno1/media/bikes/10945019_861241573938418_7246320111894320366_n_zpsfc281665.jpg.html)
Allow me to share this beautiful pic ( imho )
Nico Cereghini ( Laverda)
V.Brambilla ( guzzi )
Monza circuit .
-
It would have to be a very big hill for the current sb V7 to teach 120mph. It's more like 105-110. The currents are 38-40 rwhp.
-
My first Guzzi was a 73 Sport. I traded a 750 Norton Combat for it, it was 1977. I was a punk college student with no money and less fear. The Commando was a very quick bike, just under 13 seconds in the quarter mile stock, it would kill the Sport off the line. But, the Sport was way more capable and steady at speed. I was out riding with a couple friends one night. We had pizza in a neighboring town. On the way home my friend on his CB750 took off from the last light heading out of town, the next buddy on his 850 Commando followed. Since I had my girl friend on the back, I gave her the "hold on" tap on the hands and rolled it on. As I caught the Norton, I shifted into 4th then pulled along side the Honda and hit 5th, and rolled past him. They both told me later that they were topped out. How fast was I going? Faster than them, that's all I know. I'd like to see the dyno chart for a stock V7 Sport because I just ran a 2014 V7 Café at a local shop and it pulled 38.4 HP.
-
I know from experience a V7 Sport had a higher top speed than any stock Commando, CB750 (sohc or dohc) or even a breathed-upon MV600 with clip-ons etc. A 75/5 isn't close.
-
I know from experience a V7 Sport had a higher top speed than any stock Commando, CB750 (sohc or dohc) or even a breathed-upon MV600 with clip-ons etc. A 75/5 isn't close.
:+1
The funny thing was, shortly after that night on my Sport, I rode it home to Chicago, 350 miles. I noticed a rod knock when I arrived. I pulled the pan in a friends garage and found babbit flakes. I replaced the rod bearings and rode back to school. That winter I tore the engine down and found a severely worn cam, the number one exhaust lobe was about 1/4 shorter than number 2. I replaced the cam, case, oil pump, had the crankshaft reground and new main and rod bearings. I sold my pickup to finance it. Stupid college kid that I was, I tossed the case without stamping the numbers in the new one. So, if any of you find a 73 sport, with no engine numbers, it could be my old bike. I sold it to a guy in Tucson in 1980.
-
In 75 I owned a Kaw 400 triple. Port, polish, chambers-The Denco set-up. Supposedly good for 62 rwhp. I made lots of enemies among the CB crowd. It was a slugfest with the Hondas being the slugs.
One day on Carter St, a 76 Commando(white with blue and red striping) simply waxed my butt in a roll on. Never could catch up.
HP is a sales tool. I prefer the crank measurement. It is the most correct, IMO. RWHP is not exact-change the gear ratio at any point in the drive train and the numbers will be different even with the same engine.
-
It would have to be a very big hill for the current sb V7 to teach 120mph. It's more like 105-110. The currents are 38-40 rwhp.
The calculated top speed at redline (7200 rpm) and with stock tires is 113.2 mph for the recent 5-speed V7 models and 115.2 mph for the new 6-speed ABS models. I have no personal experience about whether the bikes will actually go that fast, but my '13 V7 Stone sure gets me up to 90 mph quickly on a flat road with no tailwind, and seems to be accelerating well at that speed. I'll leave it to braver and younger riders to report how much faster these bikes can actually go.
-
(http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab53/arveno1/bikes/10945019_861241573938418_7246320111894320366_n_zpsfc281665.jpg) (http://s849.photobucket.com/user/arveno1/media/bikes/10945019_861241573938418_7246320111894320366_n_zpsfc281665.jpg.html)
Allow me to share this beautiful pic ( imho )
Nico Cereghini ( Laverda)
V.Brambilla ( guzzi )
Monza circuit .
I would like to find a good copy of this photo. Anybody have a source?
-
who said that the new V7 max speed is 120 mph ? NOT me .
I was talking about the ORIGINAL V7 sport, and yes , no need to go downhill to get 200 all'ora with that bike.
-
Fellas , I never said the V7 Sport wasn't a bit faster than an R75 , but does anyone have verifiable evidence that they would run a true 120 MPH .
Dusty
-
Let's just agree....it's fast enough :-)
-
Fellas , I never said the V7 Sport wasn't a bit faster than an R75 , but does anyone have verifiable evidence that they would run a true 120 MPH .
Dusty
we should address this question to the V7 sport owners on this forum , they should now better...or ...sadly those bikes are just "garage queen " ? ;)
-
I would like to find a good copy of this photo. Anybody have a source?
Me, too. Great shot..
-
I am pretty darned sure a V7 Sport with fresh plugs would do 120. It required being flat on the tank.
If you believe a CB750F DOHC would do 115, then I know a V7 Sport will do 120 because I watched one absolutely walk away from said Honda during a looong straight with a bunch of bikes pinned for miles.
Verifiable? Maybe the old MIRA tests from one of the Brit bike mags-Mike Nicks had an 850T as considerably fastet than a Commando. So maybe we can find that.
-
I am just going by personal experience . At one time in the early '80s , was part of a small riding group that included an R75/5 , a really nice low mileage V7 Sport , an 850 Commando , and my slightly modded '77 T140V . They all possessed almost identical performance , dunno .
Dusty
you better watch yourself around here
(http://www.beyondhollywood.com/uploads/2009/02/meet-the-fockers-2.jpg)
-
Michael D still rides his , and if he would answer his phone or Emails ... ;D
Dusty
having ridden with him on my Greenie, it is a surprisingly fast little motorcycle.
I am still watching you! ::(
-
(http://i849.photobucket.com/albums/ab53/arveno1/bikes/10945019_861241573938418_7246320111894320366_n_zpsfc281665.jpg) (http://s849.photobucket.com/user/arveno1/media/bikes/10945019_861241573938418_7246320111894320366_n_zpsfc281665.jpg.html)
Allow me to share this beautiful pic ( imho )
Nico Cereghini ( Laverda)
V.Brambilla ( guzzi )
Monza circuit .
Thanks Marco for posting this, I ordered one from Photobucket. I had seen this photo years ago and in my memory, the other bike was a BMW. Maybe I'm thinking of a different photo. However, the question is, who is over taking who in this shot? As a life long Guzzi rider, that Laverda rider looks awfully surprised!
-
[quote author=JoeW
Thanks Marco for posting this, I ordered one from Photobucket. I had seen this photo years ago and in my memory, the other bike was a BMW. Maybe I'm thinking of a different photo. However, the question is, who is over taking who in this shot? As a life long Guzzi rider, that Laverda rider looks awfully surprised!
[/quote]
Joe , after a little bit of search i have found out that pic was taken June 25 th 1972 at the 500Km endurance race in Monza.
Racers :
Laverda :Nico Cereghini ( foto) and Adalberto Falletta
Moto Guzzi:Raimonda Riva and Vittorio Brambilla (foto)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vittorio_Brambilla
Hope this help !
Ciao
Marco
-
you better watch yourself around here
(http://www.beyondhollywood.com/uploads/2009/02/meet-the-fockers-2.jpg)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-OwMoAsP38 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-OwMoAsP38)
-
My 1973 V-7 Sport I bought new was specified top speed in the manual of about 129.5. And I remember it would go that fast or close to it. Handling was great, too.
-
Thanks Marco for posting this, I ordered one from Photobucket. I had seen this photo years ago and in my memory, the other bike was a BMW. Maybe I'm thinking of a different photo. However, the question is, who is over taking who in this shot? As a life long Guzzi rider, that Laverda rider looks awfully surprised!
Nico Cereghini wasnt surprised, methinks, as he was the original test rider/ journo for Motociclismo when the V7Sport was featued in print. He also had plenty access to Moto Guzzi at the time. Brambilla, OTOH, was a pro racer that had serious time on the GP circuit , so Cereghini probably had a "dang ,here he comes !" look on ....just wish I was there
-
Those of you who are confident that the V7Sport will do 120 plus, what is your evidence? You know that the speedos are notoriously optimistic, don't you? I'd be pretty surprised if one would do an honest 120 by timing or radar.
-
It would be very hard to say absolutely what the top speed was in 1972 or 1973, maybe I'll write to someone I know who tested them then.
It would also be hard to say if the speed today from a restored example is comparable, top speed is a funny thing, tires, plugs fuel, heck most V7 Sports in nice shape won't have their original cylinders.
120? Maybe. Faster than bikes that were claimed to go 120 or faster? Yes, but I know most of those would struggle to reach 115.
-
I think there is reasonably good evidence a V7 Sport could exceed 120 mph.
First, it is known from a MIRA test, reported in a contemporary magazine article that I have, that the T3 would do about 116. (In fact, I estimated almost exactly the same value from a run I did over a decade ago, though my estimate was based on calibrating my tachometer with milepost markers at lower speeds.)
The V7 Sport, though only a 750, was in a higher state of tune than a T3, with 9.8:1 compression ratio vs. 9.5, and with a 7200 rpm redline, vs 7000. It also had no air filter, of course. [Edit: A V7 Sport is basically a short-stroke T3 (or T), at 82.5x70 bore and stroke, vs. 83x78. It has the same valve sizes (41mm inlet 36 exhaust) and the same carburetors (VHB 30mm) with different size main jets (142 for the V7S and 120 for the T3; the T, without an air filter, also used 142's).]
Using data found in the Chilton Motorcycle Repair Manual of 1976, the top-gear speed at redline for the V7 Sport works out to 126.6, vs. 118.7 for the T3.
Also, data found both in the Chilton manual and in the factory "Work Shop Manual" covering both models shows claims of actual top speeds for the V7 Sport at 130.0 and for the T3 at 121.1, both of those evidently corresponding to engine speeds beyond the redlines.
Whether a stock V7 Sport could really do 130 may seem doubtful, but considering that the stock T3 could really do 116, and noting the ratios between the calculated redline speeds and the claimed top speeds just cited, it seems likely to me that the V7 Sport would do at least 120.
We can convert the known 116 mph top speed of the T3 to a V7 Sport value using the redline ratios: 126.6/118.7 * 116 = 123.7, or using the top speed claims, 130.0/121.1 * 116 = 124.5. So about 124 would be suggested as the actual V7 Sport maximum using either calculation.
I just wish I had one.
Moto
-
Michael D still rides his , and if he would answer his phone or Emails ... ;D
Dusty
I rode his V7 Sport. It's a magic carpet, and much faster than you might think it would be.