Wildguzzi.com

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: willowstreetguzziguy on March 09, 2016, 06:59:21 PM

Title: What a drag!
Post by: willowstreetguzziguy on March 09, 2016, 06:59:21 PM
took my 1200Sport for a 140 trip in 75 degree weather with a (new to me) HB 40 L top case attached. On the interstates, I normally can get 41-43 mpg doing 75 mph. When I looked at the computer mpg, it was a constant 34 mpg! I can't believe that rear case makes that much difference but it must catch the air behind me. Once on the back roads at slower speeds, I was getting 44 mpg.
Title: Re: What a drag!
Post by: HardAspie on March 09, 2016, 07:02:12 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9kqoD1t4lw
Title: Re: What a drag!
Post by: willowstreetguzziguy on March 09, 2016, 09:43:08 PM
Nice song.....so a 20% drop in gas mpg because of a rear trunk is normal?
Title: Re: What a drag!
Post by: HardAspie on March 09, 2016, 09:44:34 PM
I really don't know. I have had a top trunk but I did not do a before / after MPG test. I would expect a change possible, but that is a huge drop.
Title: Re: What a drag!
Post by: Moto on March 09, 2016, 10:30:14 PM
Nice song.....so a 20% drop in gas mpg because of a rear trunk is normal?

I remember reading a study that involved actual measurement of drag in which it was found that a squared-off tail
like a rear trunk can reduce drag, and improve mileage. It depends on the details, I think. A smooth airflow before
the squared-off rear is no doubt important.
Title: Re: What a drag!
Post by: HardAspie on March 09, 2016, 10:33:39 PM
And if riding solo there could be a great local turbulence between rider's back and the trunk. Thee combination could be shedding Karman Vortex Sheets.
Title: Re: What a drag!
Post by: rocker59 on March 10, 2016, 05:55:40 AM
I think there were other factors. Headwind, mathematical error, etc. I've never noticed that kind of impact from adding luggage.
Title: Re: What a drag!
Post by: kingoffleece on March 10, 2016, 06:08:57 AM
Nor have I from several bikes with top cases.
Title: Re: What a drag!
Post by: Kev m on March 10, 2016, 06:42:28 AM
I say you're victim of a small sample.

Try again.

Yeah, I've used an HB top case on every Guzzi I've ever owned (and frequently on the Sporty too).

I can't say I religiously log fuel mileage anymore but I at least check it at each fillup and have for decades.

I've never noticed that kind of impact attributable JUST to that one factor.

So yeah, I say try again... and again... or forgedaboudit.
Title: Re: What a drag!
Post by: kidsmoke on March 10, 2016, 09:22:02 AM
slight veer...but relevant. This app is called Fuelly. You can track as many vehicles as you like. I've always remained vaguely aware of mileage etc but with this being so simple, just input the stats on your phone while you're filling up, it makes it stunningly apparent what's impacting consumption.

This is a screen shot of my phone this morning. Cool app, and would serve to research this type of issue on your bike. Not sure if it was free or not, but if it cost anything it wasn't more than a buck or two or I wouldn't own it (Guzzi content)

(http://i93.photobucket.com/albums/l58/tiokimo/Jackal/1E166E2B-8063-41D1-86C3-990986F0D4A9_zpsq3qfvwfx.png) (http://s93.photobucket.com/user/tiokimo/media/Jackal/1E166E2B-8063-41D1-86C3-990986F0D4A9_zpsq3qfvwfx.png.html)
Title: Re: What a drag!
Post by: oldbike54 on March 10, 2016, 09:32:04 AM
I think there were other factors. Headwind, mathematical error, etc. I've never noticed that kind of impact from adding luggage.

 Motorcycles are so short that the aero is all screwed up . Unless the bags are sticking way out , the turbulence created by the front edge of the bike and by the rider probably hasn't returned to hit the bags . The worst shoe box cars are much slicker through the air than any street bike .

 Dusty
Title: Re: What a drag!
Post by: twowings on March 10, 2016, 01:15:33 PM
The simple physics of pushing ANYTHING through the air faster than about 55-60mph force a MARKED upward spike in fuel consumption...a slippery shape helps, certainly, but not as much as slowing down...
Title: Re: What a drag!
Post by: ITSec on March 10, 2016, 02:07:52 PM
The trunk (and panniers, for that matter) makes a difference, but not nearly as much as:

Title: Re: What a drag!
Post by: willowstreetguzziguy on March 10, 2016, 11:31:36 PM
I was measuring the avg. mpg with the 1200 Sport's computer readout. I can consistently average 42 mpg on the bike's computer, when traveling on a flat interstate without the tail trunk rather than 34 mpg with the trunk.
Title: Re: What a drag!
Post by: Vagrant on March 11, 2016, 08:13:13 AM
couple of examples. my buddy put a lot of miles on a Pacific coast without a rear rack. when he put a rack on with a 45L bag he got 2000 miles less on a rear tire. he doesn't check gas #'s.
my Ev with HB 40L side bags got 2 MPG higher than it did with Givi 45L E45 bags.
I have a 2010 Tundra 4X4 with a 10,500 towing package. on the highway it runs 16-17 empty at 80MPH.
I ran to Colorado and back with a 2015 Kawasaki Versys without bags in the back. averaged 15.7 for 3000 miles.
I put the Gold wing in the back and did 1800 miles, average 11.0 I think it was that massive tour trunk catching the wind.