Wildguzzi.com

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: Spuddy on May 21, 2016, 03:58:07 PM

Title: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: Spuddy on May 21, 2016, 03:58:07 PM
I haven't much of anything to say. I wonder of anyone is in the same boat.

Spud
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: oldbike54 on May 21, 2016, 04:08:11 PM



                                                                           0     

 
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: ccoli on May 21, 2016, 04:14:11 PM
My wife totally agrees with you.  :popcorn:
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: wrbix on May 21, 2016, 04:20:28 PM
I'm speechless
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: pebra on May 21, 2016, 04:23:04 PM
I haven't much of anything to say. I wonder of anyone is in the same boat.

Spud

I wouldn't hear you well in any case. I'm sure someone is in the same boat.
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: sidecarnutz on May 21, 2016, 05:20:40 PM
I've always been an opinionated old bastard.
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: beetle on May 21, 2016, 05:27:55 PM
(http://i86.servimg.com/u/f86/18/91/78/64/image13.gif)
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: RayB on May 21, 2016, 05:28:39 PM
Anything I would say could be too much.
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: Wayne Orwig on May 21, 2016, 05:31:28 PM
I don't believe a word of it.....
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: Guzzistajohn on May 21, 2016, 05:38:37 PM
Took the words right outa my mouth! Hey that's unsanitary! :angry:
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: twowings on May 21, 2016, 06:00:00 PM
Silence is golden....
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: slowmover on May 21, 2016, 07:00:09 PM
"Those who say,do not know.Those who know, do not say.-Lao Tzu
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: samfrank on May 21, 2016, 08:16:56 PM
This thread makes no sense. Get out and ride!
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: rodekyll on May 21, 2016, 08:34:29 PM
I took the above advice and verified that my Convert does 4850revs @ 80mph.  By my math it should approach the rev limiter and the speed of light at about the same moment, in the northern hemisphere.  My math also tells me I'd need all the straight road in Kansas to accelerate to the rev limiter.  It will not happen here.

It's not nuttin, but it's not really sumptin, either.
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: lucydad on May 21, 2016, 08:58:24 PM
Spud,

One of my favorite deep meditations is seeking the "nothing".  Endlessly healthy for the mind.  And peaceful.

Namaste.

The Durango Kid

hoping it is dry enough to ride Sunday
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: lucian on May 21, 2016, 09:07:26 PM
My wife totally agrees with you.  :popcorn:

Haven't spoken to my wife in six years.

I didn't want to interrupt her. :thewife:
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: oldbike54 on May 21, 2016, 09:09:30 PM
 Really when one thinks about it , the complete absurdity of existence begins to come in focus . The only true question , why is the normal state not total nothingness  :huh:

 Dusty
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: lucian on May 21, 2016, 09:20:49 PM
Really when one thinks about it , the complete absurdity of existence begins to come in focus . The only true question , why is the normal state not total nothingness  :huh:

 Dusty

Could you please describe "normal" 
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: oldbike54 on May 21, 2016, 09:22:35 PM
Could you please describe "normal"

 A state rarely observed on WG  :laugh:

 Dusty
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: lucian on May 21, 2016, 09:25:18 PM
A state rarely observed on WG  :laugh:

 Dusty

Thanks,  I think
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: Arizona Wayne on May 21, 2016, 09:29:49 PM
I took the above advice and verified that my Convert does 4850revs @ 80mph.  By my math it should approach the rev limiter and the speed of light at about the same moment, in the northern hemisphere.  My math also tells me I'd need all the straight road in Kansas to accelerate to the rev limiter.  It will not happen here.

It's not nuttin, but it's not really sumptin, either.


Then your rig is undergeared.  :cheesy:  Too bad you can't put it in low.  :tongue:
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: rodekyll on May 21, 2016, 10:08:23 PM
This is the 2-wheeler.  I could shift it if I wanted to, but it's a Convert, so it's always in the right gear.  If the engine had to go faster to do 80 it would.  Shifting only makes it go faster faster for not as fast as not shifting.


I'll submit that last sentence for the NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER competition.   :cool:
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: HardAspie on May 21, 2016, 10:12:36 PM
Bleh.
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: Penderic on May 21, 2016, 10:31:33 PM
That means, gasp, that there is .....

(http://i1299.photobucket.com/albums/ag77/Penderic/Penderic001/no-pie_zpsqnq1wlbw.jpg)
 :cry:
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: Moto Fugazzi on May 22, 2016, 01:47:10 AM
Don't say anything unless you can improve the silence.
Ken
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: cruzziguzzi on May 22, 2016, 11:16:38 AM
I wanted to, I really did... Well, that's likely an overstatement.

I was about to, but then thought better of it as many do but don't share. We often have that but seldom discuss it if at all though in point of fact, if it ever really does occur, it just didn't.

When there was one here before, I spoke out against without really saying anything in particular and the anger and vitriol of the silence was deafening though that might have merely been an over interpretation of something that never really passed - if the interpretation was anything more than imagination.

In any case, to offer support of that or anything for that matter might be a fool's errand which is to say; a fool's error and/or a fool's erred end, I dunno.

With respect to not wandering off-topic, it is probably best to quit this here rather than offer up opportunity for tangent sniper's to pick up a thread and run with it.

Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, here I am, stuck in the middle with you!


Todd.
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: Orange Guzzi on May 22, 2016, 11:29:31 AM
Since it is election season, I will say this, "David Byrnes for President". Giving us a new perspective of life thru music. 
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: Penderic on May 22, 2016, 04:15:10 PM
(http://i1299.photobucket.com/albums/ag77/Penderic/Penderic001/contain_zpswsiwhiaj.jpg)

Sorry!  :lipsrsealed: Since nothing is happening here, I'd thought I'd go for a ride.

Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: cruzziguzzi on May 22, 2016, 05:12:01 PM
"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true."

Talk about "no content".



Todd.
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: Chipmaker on May 22, 2016, 09:12:23 PM
  Grandpappy once told me.It was better to remain silent and be thought a fool,than to speek and remove all dought.
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: trippah on May 22, 2016, 09:27:46 PM
I think the normal here is Abby.
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: JeffOlson on May 22, 2016, 09:33:25 PM
I try not to say too much...
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: cruzziguzzi on May 22, 2016, 09:40:02 PM
  Grandpappy once told me.It was better to remain silent and be thought a fool,than to speek and remove all dought.

Or worse yet, leave written evidence. :evil:


Todd.
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: oldbike54 on May 22, 2016, 09:43:14 PM
Or worse yet, leave written evidence. :evil:


Todd.

 Alternative Aussie spelling  :laugh:

 Dusty
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: Nic in Western NYS on May 23, 2016, 04:46:45 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SCOimBo5tg

When you say nothing at all - Alison Krauss

Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: Muzz on May 23, 2016, 04:51:45 AM
 :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: Curtis Harper on May 23, 2016, 04:36:41 PM
The most difficult action in the acquisition of nothing is knowing when you have all of the nothing and there is no more nothing for anything else.
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: Penderic on May 23, 2016, 11:57:07 PM
You know, shipping costs are much cheaper that way. Clever.


You can put the contents back in later.
(http://i1299.photobucket.com/albums/ag77/Penderic/Penderic001/grapesmade_zpsvucwzkiz.jpg)
 :grin:
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: cruzziguzzi on May 24, 2016, 08:59:42 AM
You know, shipping costs are much cheaper that way. Clever.


You can put the contents back in later.
(http://i1299.photobucket.com/albums/ag77/Penderic/Penderic001/grapesmade_zpsvucwzkiz.jpg)
 :grin:

Grape-flate-gate!?!


Todd.
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: vstevens on May 24, 2016, 09:04:08 AM
Really when one thinks about it , the complete absurdity of existence begins to come in focus . The only true question , why is the normal state not total nothingness  :huh:

 Dusty

Because we live in an expanding universe.  👽
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: slowmover on May 24, 2016, 10:08:16 AM
Alan Watts- Nothingness-https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ssf7P-Sgcrk
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: oldbike54 on May 24, 2016, 10:24:13 AM
Because we live in an expanding universe.  👽

 Or expanding multiverses , damnit , now my head hurts  :huh:

 Dusty
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: twowings on May 24, 2016, 03:33:42 PM
Damn, Spuddy....you're just like Seinfeld....making gold out of a thread about....NOTHING... .
Title: Re: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER
Post by: oldbike54 on May 24, 2016, 04:17:09 PM
Damn, Spuddy....you're just like Seinfeld....making gold out of a thread about....NOTHING... .

 Rumor has it you never want to play poker with Spud  :laugh:

 Dusty