Wildguzzi.com

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: twowings on June 05, 2017, 03:20:17 PM

Title: Back To The Future Manx
Post by: twowings on June 05, 2017, 03:20:17 PM
Opinions?

(http://kickstart.bikeexif.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/custom-thruxton.jpg)

http://www.bikeexif.com/custom-thruxton?omhide=true (http://www.bikeexif.com/custom-thruxton?omhide=true)


Title: Re: Back To The Future Manx
Post by: roadscum on June 05, 2017, 04:48:55 PM
If it weighted 310lbs. like the original I'd be interested. I owned a last gen EFI Triumph Scrambler for a few years and recently borrow a new Bonnie for a few hours. I wasn't impressed.

Paul
Title: Re: Back To The Future Manx
Post by: oldbike54 on June 05, 2017, 05:00:58 PM
 Kinda cool , and you won't need a 6 foot steel bar with a giant Whitworth socket welded on to "do" up the crankshaft nut  :shocked:

 Oh , I don't believe any of the 30 M Manxes ever made 54 HP , at least not back when they were a gp tool .

 Dusty
Title: Re: Back To The Future Manx
Post by: JJ on June 05, 2017, 05:39:35 PM
I like it...for an around town / back roads on a Sunday / bar bike / Bike Night bike.  :thumb: :1: :cool:
Title: Re: Back To The Future Manx
Post by: Northern Bill on June 05, 2017, 05:50:24 PM
I like it, especially the way the seat and rear light is done but this is still a big bike compared to a Manx.  I have seen a lot of really nice specials using the new Triumph motor but the one thing you can't get away from is the weight.  I had a 2009 Scrambler that I reduced by 60 pounds and it was still a heavy bike.

Title: Re: Back To The Future Manx
Post by: Dofin on June 05, 2017, 05:51:02 PM
Looks cool but I'll stay with my '15 V7 Stone. 
Title: Re: Back To The Future Manx
Post by: Turin on June 05, 2017, 08:56:25 PM
looks squatty and out of proportion.
Title: Re: Back To The Future Manx
Post by: johnr on June 05, 2017, 09:54:48 PM
I think it would look better if the exhaust pipes followed a more traditional round the front of the engine route.
Title: Re: Back To The Future Manx
Post by: Tusayan on June 05, 2017, 11:22:53 PM
It's not a Manx Norton replica, it's a Triton replica.  Possibly the least elegantly proportioned Triton (replica) I've seen but I'm sure it's reliable.  More like a '64 Honda Dream in that regard, heavy and inelegant but reliable.  Mostly I wish people would leave history alone.
Title: Re: Back To The Future Manx
Post by: blackcat on June 06, 2017, 06:59:58 AM
It's not a Manx Norton replica, it's a Triton replica.  Possibly the least elegantly proportioned Triton (replica) I've seen but I'm sure it's reliable. 

I assume that the above bike cost north of $20K, based on that I'd rather have a real Triton as it could be done for less and it looks substantially better.
Title: Re: Back To The Future Manx
Post by: Northern Bill on June 06, 2017, 10:21:15 AM
My guess is the price is way north of 20K!  To me it is neither a Manx or a Triton replica but still a good looking bike in its own right.  I am glad people are building these types of bikes.  I like looking at them even though I could never afford one.  Similarly, some of the Guzzis on pipeline are really nicely done but again at huge prices.  It sure beats the days when most of the builds were unrideable choppers.
Title: Re: Back To The Future Manx
Post by: cruzziguzzi on June 06, 2017, 12:01:36 PM
Generally speaking, for me, if you're gonna go "retro" - then go retro-pure.

Modern nods like the headlight angle, USD forks, over-proud brake reservoir and the like fairly SCREAM out at me visually. These little things totally queer my enjoyment of an otherwise fine styling exercise.

Anyhow, you asked.


Todd.