New Moto Guzzi Door Mats Available Now
I think your gooffin on us,right? Peanuts cannot possibly make up a significant fraction of an elephants diet in the wild. Are peanuts even native to Africa?
Mantle had liver cancer otherwise its a good theory. Gian4
The only peanuts elephants get are those poor elephants that are incarcerated in zoos. Peanuts are native to south and central America and Mexico. From the BBC article on why elephants do not get cancer. Totally non Guzzi stuff but quite interesting science in its own right. http://www.bbc.com/news/health-34466220"The scientists turned to the elephant's DNA - the blueprint of life - to find an explanation.Cancer is caused by mutations in a cell's DNA that produce faulty instructions leading to rampant growth as the cell spirals out of control,But animals also have "smoke alarms" that detect the damage and either lead to the cell being repaired or killed.One of these alarms is called TP53, and while humans have one TP53 gene, elephants have 20.As a result, elephants seem far more keen to kill off cells on the cusp of going rogue.Dr Joshua Schiffman, one of the researchers and a paediatric oncologist, said: "By all logical reasoning, elephants should be developing a tremendous amount of cancer, and in fact, should be extinct by now due to such a high risk for cancer".Quote"As a result, elephants seem far more keen to kill off cells on the cusp of going rogue.Dr Joshua Schiffman, one of the researchers and a paediatric oncologist, said: '"By all logical reasoning, elephants should be developing a tremendous amount of cancer, and in fact, should be extinct by now due to such a high risk for cancer"'.? I don't understand the statement by this Dr. Schiffman? Isn't his reasoning backwards?
"As a result, elephants seem far more keen to kill off cells on the cusp of going rogue.Dr Joshua Schiffman, one of the researchers and a paediatric oncologist, said: '"By all logical reasoning, elephants should be developing a tremendous amount of cancer, and in fact, should be extinct by now due to such a high risk for cancer"'.? I don't understand the statement by this Dr. Schiffman? Isn't his reasoning backwards?
Not if you read the article. Elephants should have higher incidence of cancer that humans because they have some many more cells that can go haywire. The larger the animal the more cells it has and the greater chance of cancer.