Visit the Wildguzzi Amazon Affiliate Store
Kev, I am not totally sure how or when it works but it is part of the evap system. What I believe happens is that the valve opens and pulls air through the evaporative canister into the intake manifold further leaning out the intake mixture. I may be totally all wet but that is what it looks like to me. Whether it does it during open or closed loop I don't know but probably open.kk
So EVAP systems store HC's (fuel vapors) that "evaporate" (where abbreviation comes from) and then draws it off to burn as part of normal combustion. As you note it enters upstream of the combustion chambers. SAS - Secondary Air Systems inject air into the exhaust system near the exhaust valve to help afterburn of HC's that weren't fully consumed by normal combustion.Two pretty different and separate systems.
I continue to push back on your term spoof.For it to be a spoof you have to be fooling someone or something.Afaik, no automotive emissions tests are taking place with an air injection system active as the majority application on cars these days is to more quickly heat the cat con. But in the end the emission system is designed to reduce what comes out of the tail pipe. The injection system isn't designed to dilute that, it's designed to add oxygen to the oxygen depleted mixture to allow more burning thereby actually reducing emissions.
Spoof......
At first I assume Special Air Services.....
At first I assumed Special Air Services.....___________________ ___________________ ___________
I'd tell you, but I'd have to kill you...
Quote from: SIR REAL ED on Today at 12:36:29 AMAt first I assumed Special Air Services.....___________________ ___________________ ___________I'd tell you, but I'd have to kill you...
"Will the lack of air in the exhaust stream resulting in cleaner/leaner exhaust gasses cause the ECU to lean out the already too lean fuel trims even more?"The SAS is downstream of the combustion chambers, so SAS wouldn't directly affect AFR. The o2 sensors may see a difference when the SAS is operating, but I suspect the ECU might account for SAS operation and disregard or compensate for that signal when it's active. I don't know that, just a theory. If it were the case, an inoperable SAS that's still in place seems like a better approach than a removed one, if you're going to stray from stock.What is there to gain though besides lessening decel pop? I enjoy a little decel pop
The 02 sensors are after the SAS and before the CAT. I'm just wondering if the lack of the air added by the SAS at the exhaust port would raise the A/F ratio (making it appear richer) and cause the ECU to cut fuel trims making an already lean fuel mixture leaner. If the SAS is designed to improve catalyst function in the CAT Convertor and it is removed if it is a necessary or beneficial system.