New Moto Guzzi Door Mats Available Now
Never seen one of these but I like it. I had a t100 for a short spell and found it nice to look at but boring to ride. I think the seller may be right, this may be a collectible. Any thoughts?Sure it`s collectible it will be worth $7000 in ten more years. Passbook savings will do you better with no maintenance costs.https://maine.craigslist.org/mcy/d/2000-kawasaki-w650-triumph/6362829944.html
If the Bonneville bored you, the Kaw would put you to sleep. I found the W650 to be even more underwhelming than my 790 Triumphs. The kick start is a nice novelty feature, as is the bevel tower, and it is refreshing to see a classic styled bike. Kawasaki could not give them away when they were new, however. It seems that more people, me included, would rather see "TRIUMPH" on the tank.
I would imagine the engine performance may be less than the t100, but they did a nice job aesthetically. I like the old school touches like the kick start ,twin instruments, carbs, rear drum ,chrome fenders, fork gators, pea shooters and a classic rear rack. Really reminds me of all the old Nortons, bsa's and Triumphs I grew up watching all the cool older guy's riding. ( I'm 56) At 5,500 it is already holding it's own value wise. Sometimes knock off's surpass the real deal somehow. I wonder if it has points or elct?
Shorty, since all this stuff is subjective ...... I have to say I found the W650 more interesting and involving than the T100. Having owned a BSA 650 Scrambler (A10,) and spent a good bit of time on a Triumph TR6 in the mid-1960s, the W seemed more true to the older bikes than the Triumph.
As others have said, I really like the kick start feature. Too bad Kaw didn't think this would sell in the USA, or...maybe they knew right, and the real answer is "too bad USA riders don't appreciate a lightweight, old school bike."