New Moto Guzzi Door Mats Available Now
Maybe I should have asked about this problem a different way.What causes Startus Interuptus??????I have read about different fixes, like adding a set of wires with a connector on each end (the one sold or free on this site), cutting a wire and replacing it, ect..Does one fix repair all models? Does Zoom Zoom's fix only apply to one model or all?I asked this question not just for me, but to be a thread that will help all that have had or are worried that the problem may arise. Looking for (if there is??) other fixes and why if they are model specific.Thanks again,Tom
To be sarcastic.....It's a feature the factory put in to stay in touch w the wealthy GUZZI owners around Lake Coumo....The bike sits after an initial purchase, maybe over the winter. come spring there is just....not....enou gh....juice...to turn it over. Short maybe 0.3 volts to excite the starting circuit.Phone call to dealer...dealer picks up....diagnosis? Time for a new bike! This one is getting old...new bike sale...rinse and repeat. How else do you explain a known fixable problem broadcast all over this board for 2 or more decades? Three decades! My 1990 Cal 3 had this problem...Of course! It's a feature!
At first glance though that not would cure the low volts from the ECU dropping out the relay as the ECU is on the coil circuit. In fact it would make it worse as the lower load resistance would allow more current to flow dropping the battery voltage still further.
I here a single noticable "clink" and then nothing.
On most Guzzis I merely replace the wires at 87 & 30 in the existing relay socket with 12 gauge wire and proper terminals, bringing a fused wire directly from the battery or even from battery cable at solenoid to 30, then 12 gauge straight from 87 to solenoid trigger. I then clip and heat shrink that might be exposed and tuck them away. No need to over think or complicate things, Guzzi just designed a lousy circuit that is easily rectified.
Thanks JohnA & WirespokesSo if I have it right it's how I thought, a direct wire, through a fuse, on the Load circuitThe coil or activation side of the relay remains as isAt first glance though that not would cure the low volts from the ECU dropping out the relay as the ECU is on the coil circuit. In fact it would make it worse as the lower load resistance would allow more current to flow dropping the battery voltage still further.However it's counter intuitive and probably the reason a lot of people get their knickers in a twist over it.It's because the resistance on the load circuit results in the 0.25 Ohm coil in the solenoid being held in for longer, it would generate a weaker magnetic field, due to the lower voltage. That results in the battery voltage dipping for longer and resulting in the ECU dropping out and all the other wierd effects encountered.
I'm working on 10 year old or so memories, but I believe it was the activation circuit and not load choice l circuit which required the new fused power feed.
BUT........... Here is where I get confused again. The 40 amp power spike????From what I understand, one of the interuptus issues, at least that stands out from all the past posts about it, is an issue of something like a 40 amp spike when you hit the starter button on the handlebar. Again from what I understand, this spike travels up to the key switch, through some wires and relays, then through the starter button, then to the solenoid. This is what causes the switches to fail.Is there a spike through the switches???The way I understand the fixes above. They only help from about the starter relay, not the switches. So IF there is a spike through the switches and wiring harness that leads to the TRIGGER SIDE OF THE STARTER RELAY, why would the spike happen with the starter relay???? The high amp spike, in my limited electrical knowledge, should be only on the high amp side of the relay. The trigger side that's connected with the switches should see a very small amp spike???