Author Topic: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body  (Read 4837 times)

Online SIR REAL ED

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2875
  • uh.... it's personal....
  • Location: Forest, VA
oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« on: November 03, 2019, 09:13:15 AM »
just curious about differences here.

Pete Roper was kind enough to share the following with me after I requested information:

"As a twin throttlebody model I would strongly recommend getting a sump extension. The earlier smallblocks suffer from a weird affliction where they won't use any oil for tens of thousands of Km and then suddenly and without any warning they will 'Vanish' their oil in a couple of hundred Km! This results in ruined big ends and general wailing and gnashing of teeth! My guess is it must be ring related as when the engine was modified for the advent of the single throttlebody models the pistons and rings were redesigned, (I've no idea in what way but my guess is the second ring became a torsional taper faced semi-scraper.) and the problem was eliminated. A sump extension won't stop it happening but the extra litre of oil means you have a greater chance of catching it before it makes the 'Dogga-Dogga' noise."

As anyone ever replaced the twin throttle body pistons and/or cylinders with single throttle body pistons and/or cylinders?  Do they interchange?  I've read about the 820cc kits, I would assume the people making these know about this problem and would like to hope their piston/ring design would not have copied the twin throttle body piston/ring design. 
« Last Edit: November 03, 2019, 09:14:19 AM by SIR REAL ED »
2019 Beta EVO 250
1999 Suzuki DR 650 w/790cc kit
1994, 2001, & 2002 MZ Skorpions

pete roper

  • Guest
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2019, 02:45:46 PM »
I haven't had heads on the bench for comparison but the later pistons have a different crown design. They may also be completely different weights which produces a whole host of different problems.

I'd also guess it would be very pricey. I just bought a pair of piston assemblies for a 1400 Cali for another project I'm working on and didn't get any change out of $800AU.

A sump extension and checking your oil frequently is a far cheaper option.

Pete

Online SIR REAL ED

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2875
  • uh.... it's personal....
  • Location: Forest, VA
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #2 on: November 03, 2019, 06:39:20 PM »
I haven't had heads on the bench for comparison but the later pistons have a different crown design. They may also be completely different weights which produces a whole host of different problems.

I'd also guess it would be very pricey. I just bought a pair of piston assemblies for a 1400 Cali for another project I'm working on and didn't get any change out of $800AU.

A sump extension and checking your oil frequently is a far cheaper option.

Pete

Thanks for the additional information Pete.  I agree on checking oil frequently.  IIRC, for the Aprilia RXV's & SXV's one could expect to burn 1-2 ml of oil per mile.  As you said above, sump extension is not a cure. 

Do you know of/have hard of anyone who has had this problem who went the more conventional route of checking piston-cylinder clearance and ring end gap?  Any success stories of fitting new rings with correct end gap to existing pistons?  Are overbore pistons and rings available?

Since there is not too many Moto Guzzi's compared to other brands, easy to understand piston manuacturers not being interested in a fix.

This is an interesting problem.  My bike is low mileage, so I'm more curious, than concerned.  How common is this, and at what mileage would one expect it to begin, if ever?  Has Moto Guzzi ever owned up to admitting the problem and explained why the single TB pistons are different?

Thanks in advance.
2019 Beta EVO 250
1999 Suzuki DR 650 w/790cc kit
1994, 2001, & 2002 MZ Skorpions

Online Kev m

  • Not your normal Hombre
  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 31277
  • Yo from Medford, NJ
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #3 on: November 03, 2019, 07:47:56 PM »
I think part of the problem is that though we've heard/seen a few occurrences over the years no one knows for sure what happened/why and therefore how to be sure to prevent it.

I seem to recall Pete mentioning a customer who lent his fine running, seemingly non-oil burning bike to his daughter who took it on a higway run and burnt up the motor in a couple hundred kms.

Ironically this is why I ordered and installed a sump extender on my first year 1TB V7 only to later discover I probably didn't need it. But then again it makes me feel warm and fuzzy to this day.

If I had an older model I don't see it worth it to chase the issue another way.
Current Fleet

18 Guzzi V7III Carbon Dark
13 Guzzi V7 Stone
11 Duc M696

Online SIR REAL ED

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2875
  • uh.... it's personal....
  • Location: Forest, VA
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #4 on: November 03, 2019, 09:54:54 PM »
I think part of the problem is that though we've heard/seen a few occurrences over the years no one knows for sure what happened/why and therefore how to be sure to prevent it.

I seem to recall Pete mentioning a customer who lent his fine running, seemingly non-oil burning bike to his daughter who took it on a higway run and burnt up the motor in a couple hundred kms.

Ironically this is why I ordered and installed a sump extender on my first year 1TB V7 only to later discover I probably didn't need it. But then again it makes me feel warm and fuzzy to this day.

If I had an older model I don't see it worth it to chase the issue another way.

I agree with your thinking.  The sump extension is more peace of mind, simply because it increases the margin of time you have available from the start of problem to huge, expensive damage.

I am completely ignorant of this event in the Moto Guzzi world.  All I know is what is in this thread.  From Pete's original description, rapid change from no problem to burning lots of oil, it sounds like one or more stuck rings.  If it ever happened to me, I'd switch from educated engineer, back to my redneck, farmer roots and treat it like a old farm tractor.  Perform a compression test and/or a leak down test.  Remove both spark plugs, rotate the engine until the pistons are mid stroke, and fill the cylinders with motor oil or kerosene and check often to see if one is draining quicker than the other.  Then perhaps fill both cylinders with penetrating oil, and refill often for about a week.  Drain the crankcase, refill with motor oil and start it up and check oil consumption.

If that didn't help, it might be revealing to pull the pistons and check for stuck or broken rings, measure ring end gap, and piston cylinder clearance.

It would also be interesting to know if this primarily happens in bikes that are not ridden or started often.  Or only to owners who use cheap gasoline or cheap oil.  A rare problem?  But with expensive consequences.  And little diagnostics performed when it occurred.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2019, 05:28:59 AM by SIR REAL ED »
2019 Beta EVO 250
1999 Suzuki DR 650 w/790cc kit
1994, 2001, & 2002 MZ Skorpions

pete roper

  • Guest
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #5 on: November 03, 2019, 11:20:22 PM »
On the engines I've seen, (4 or 5.) that have done this the rings and groves were all well within tolerance. It's very weird, the air boxes are usually dry and the engines don't smoke. Even the plugs look OK.

As I said I'm baffled by what might cause it but it happened!

Offline fossil

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 693
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #6 on: November 04, 2019, 01:07:54 AM »
Well, my 2013 early STB Stone does not burn oil (26000km). A sump extender would prolong the time until the oil is warmed up. As I often ride in cool weather (this year in about -8°C for several mornings at commuting) it would increase wear. An oil thermometer is the addition I use. And I regularly check the oil.
Greetings from Germany!
Thorsten

Online SIR REAL ED

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2875
  • uh.... it's personal....
  • Location: Forest, VA
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #7 on: November 04, 2019, 05:50:06 AM »
On the engines I've seen, (4 or 5.) that have done this the rings and groves were all well within tolerance. It's very weird, the air boxes are usually dry and the engines don't smoke. Even the plugs look OK.

As I said I'm baffled by what might cause it but it happened!

Thanks Pete.  Good to know that at least someone looked at the pistons and rings.  What was the owners' responses?  Did any authorize you to attempt repairs?  Did they abandon their bikes?  Continue to ride their bikes as is?  Replace pistons, rings, and cylinders?

Very strange.  Sounds like a rare problem easily avoided by frequent oil checks and/or installing a sump extension.  Was the drain plug still installed in the oil pan?   :wink:

My major beef with KTM was in response to the question of "I know this has happened (automatic de-compressors that are stuck and not working) to at least 5 Duke 690's from reading forums.  How common is this problem, and why are the dealers not aware of it's occurrence?"  was..... "It is our policy not to share repair/warranty technical information with KTM owners." 
"Really?  Are you sure that is a good idea, cause your customers are using the internet to share information with each other?  You might want to get in on being part of the solution, rather than part of the problem!"

Not smart in the  Information Tech Age to be secretive.  IMHO, it does not inspire confidence in people or brands when you are a manufacturer and can't answer a warranty issue with specific numbers. 
2019 Beta EVO 250
1999 Suzuki DR 650 w/790cc kit
1994, 2001, & 2002 MZ Skorpions

Offline Two Checks

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 6036
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #8 on: November 04, 2019, 09:58:48 AM »


Quote from: SIR REAL ED on November 03, 2019, 09:54:54 PM
I agree with your thinking.  The sump extension is more peace of mind, simply because it increases the margin of time you have available from the start of problem to huge, expensive damage.

I am completely ignorant of this event in the Moto Guzzi world.  All I know is what is in this thread.  From Pete's original description, rapid change from no problem to burning lots of oil, it sounds like one or more stuck rings.  If it ever happened to me, I'd switch from educated engineer, back to my redneck, farmer roots and treat it like a old farm tractor.  Perform a compression test and/or a leak down test.  Remove both spark plugs, rotate the engine until the pistons are mid stroke, and fill the cylinders with motor oil or kerosene and check often to see if one is draining quicker than the other.  Then perhaps fill both cylinders with penetrating oil, and refill often for about a week.  Drain the crankcase, refill with motor oil and start it up and check oil consumption.

If that didn't help, it might be revealing to pull the pistons and check for stuck or broken rings, measure ring end gap, and piston cylinder clearance.

It would also be interesting to know if this primarily happens in bikes that are not ridden or started often.  Or only to owners who use cheap gasoline or cheap oil.  A rare problem?  But with expensive consequences.  And little diagnostics performed when it occurred.

Please define cheap oil and gasoline.


1990 Cal III f/f  "Il Duce' III"
1987 1000 SPII "Il Duce' II"

Online SIR REAL ED

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2875
  • uh.... it's personal....
  • Location: Forest, VA
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #9 on: November 04, 2019, 11:31:43 AM »

Please define cheap oil and gasoline.


0w-30 bought at a convenient store, and E85?   :wink:

Maybe someone needs to start a "What's the best engine oil?" thread........   :laugh:
« Last Edit: November 04, 2019, 11:32:39 AM by SIR REAL ED »
2019 Beta EVO 250
1999 Suzuki DR 650 w/790cc kit
1994, 2001, & 2002 MZ Skorpions

Offline Two Checks

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 6036
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #10 on: November 04, 2019, 02:29:53 PM »
E 85 basically isn't gasoline. And it doesn't matter where the oil is purchased.
If the oil meets spec its good oil.
And I don't know of any motorcycle that can run on E85.
How about E100? Is that cheap stuff?
« Last Edit: November 04, 2019, 02:31:10 PM by Two Checks »
1990 Cal III f/f  "Il Duce' III"
1987 1000 SPII "Il Duce' II"

Offline moto-uno

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 1476
  • Location: Burnaby , B.C
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #11 on: November 04, 2019, 02:50:20 PM »
  ^Don't go there !
    I'm not very versed on this model , but is there a possibility that these smoking bikes have a crankcase venting problem ?  Peter

Offline Muzz

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 7077
  • On the backside of the planet.
  • Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #12 on: November 04, 2019, 03:15:58 PM »
Since very early on I have been aware of this problem.  Fortunately, to date I have never experienced it in some 28,000 miles.  I don't live in a hot climate; it can get hot but overall it could be called temperate.  Yes it's recommended but I have not fitted an extender.

I regularly check the drain pipes, air cleaner box and especially the dipstick.  I carry a 500ml pack of 10W/60 at all times.  Our service stations just do not carry it.

Have just done 900 miles on the Tattley Rappet rally, and with old oil that now needs changing the level has dropped about 1/3 down the marked oil range.  This included some "spirited" riding, at times pulling over 6000rpm in top.    :copcar: yeah, I know.  Good thing he pinged me when he did and not a couple of minutes ealier. :rolleyes:

I suspect it may also relate to how they were run in; I spent considerable time going up and down our Port Hills two up loading the rings up but not lugging the donk.

I have a permanently mounted back pack on the bike which carries amongst other things the oil pack and a pair of pipe tongs to nip up the dipstick.  For some reason the early ones  used to sometimes have the dipstick unscrew; mine did. :evil:  I won't be fitting an extender; I have had the bike from new and it has never shown any propensity to ditch it's oil. However, as Pete has said, there is no rhyme or reason as to why or when they do it.
Muzz. Cristchurch, New Zealand
03 Breva

Life is just a bowl of Allbran
Ya wake up in the morning and it's there

Online SIR REAL ED

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2875
  • uh.... it's personal....
  • Location: Forest, VA
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #13 on: November 04, 2019, 03:42:05 PM »

I suspect it may also relate to how they were run in; I spent considerable time going up and down our Port Hills two up loading the rings up but not lugging the donk.


I also wonder about that.  Back in the day, bikes had the little stickers on the tach "Don't exceed 4000 rpm for 500 miles then don't exceed 6000 rpm for the next 500 miles, etc."

Also was the admonishment to never ever ever use synthetic oil in an engine until you had over 1000 miles on it or the rings will never seat.  Different manufacturing now vs then.  When I was at GM in the mid 1980's they were polishing the cylinder bores and fitting pistons with higher clearances in some of the newer engines, rather than the old cross hatching of the cylinder and expecting the owner to "break it in" that was being done simultaneously on the older engines (IIRC, the 454 cu in.) coming off the line.

So many variables and so little information.  Kinda like a murder mystery.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2019, 03:49:50 PM by SIR REAL ED »
2019 Beta EVO 250
1999 Suzuki DR 650 w/790cc kit
1994, 2001, & 2002 MZ Skorpions

Online SIR REAL ED

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2875
  • uh.... it's personal....
  • Location: Forest, VA
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #14 on: November 04, 2019, 04:00:38 PM »
E 85 basically isn't gasoline. And it doesn't matter where the oil is purchased.
If the oil meets spec its good oil.
And I don't know of any motorcycle that can run on E85.
How about E100? Is that cheap stuff?

here's the ticket!  Damn fine substitute for 0w-20, 15w-60, 85w-140, ATF, DOT 3, 4, or 5 brake fluid, and as Anti-Freeze that will never wear out.  Been using it nigh on 50 years now.....  All the best convenient stores stock it.  It is in the same aisle as the fishing lures and live baby chicks.   :laugh:




2019 Beta EVO 250
1999 Suzuki DR 650 w/790cc kit
1994, 2001, & 2002 MZ Skorpions

Offline malik

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 2395
  • Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #15 on: November 04, 2019, 04:43:06 PM »
I've recently acquired a 2011 V7C that suffered this vanishing oil syndrome. 127,000km on the clock, the owner said the oil would vanish in a few hundred kms, no smoke, no leaks, no oily plugs, just gone. The final straw - the dipstick blew out with a truck on his tail. By the time he could pull over, it was too late. I bought the gearbox, and he threw in the rest of the bike. Other than some of bits he pilfered for his Stone, it's pretty well complete. And as I have a low km Breva motor sitting on the shelf ......

My 2010 V7C has always used some oil between changes, in spite of a careful running in (oil change at 35km - lots of metal swarf - running in oil for 500km, another oil change then, 1000km of mostly tight & hilly twisties & the dealer first service at 1000km, 6 days after I bought it). Still going strong at 210,000km, although there are no some rattles that I'm keeping an eye and ear on.

The 2014 Special, on the other hand, doesn't appear to use much oil at all between changes (at each 10,000km).
2010 V7 Classic, 2014 V7 Special
1996 1100 Sport Carb (in NZ), 2004 V11 LeMans (in UK)
Carberry Enfield V-Twin, 2008 Royal Enfield Electra, 2006 RE Electra 535

Online SIR REAL ED

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2875
  • uh.... it's personal....
  • Location: Forest, VA
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #16 on: November 04, 2019, 06:10:45 PM »
I've recently acquired a 2011 V7C that suffered this vanishing oil syndrome. 127,000km on the clock, the owner said the oil would vanish in a few hundred kms, no smoke, no leaks, no oily plugs, just gone. The final straw - the dipstick blew out with a truck on his tail. By the time he could pull over, it was too late. I bought the gearbox, and he threw in the rest of the bike. Other than some of bits he pilfered for his Stone, it's pretty well complete. And as I have a low km Breva motor sitting on the shelf ......

My 2010 V7C has always used some oil between changes, in spite of a careful running in (oil change at 35km - lots of metal swarf - running in oil for 500km, another oil change then, 1000km of mostly tight & hilly twisties & the dealer first service at 1000km, 6 days after I bought it). Still going strong at 210,000km, although there are no some rattles that I'm keeping an eye and ear on.

The 2014 Special, on the other hand, doesn't appear to use much oil at all between changes (at each 10,000km).

very interesting, thanks for sharing.  Are the 2010 and 2011 both the twin TB models?  Was 2012 the year of the switch from twin to single TB's?

Dip stick blowing out seems like a crankcase venting issue.  Maybe related?

I think you and I have similar break-in habits.  I'll do lots of roll-ons from mile zero, along with up thru gears redline blasts followed by a long coast down to about 10 mph.  Hard load for a several seconds, then easy/coast for about 3-4 times as long.  I also like lots of short heat cycles early on.  Oil change at 50 miles, then 250 miles, then 1000 miles seems cheap enough.

The theory I've heard which makes sense to me is the short hard loads seat the rings, and the coasting allows oil to be sucked up to lube the pistons and rings.
2019 Beta EVO 250
1999 Suzuki DR 650 w/790cc kit
1994, 2001, & 2002 MZ Skorpions

Offline hzbloke

  • Hatchling
  • **
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 93
  • Location: Bottom right corner of Oz
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #17 on: November 05, 2019, 03:38:21 AM »
2008 Breva. 80,000 km. The bike had 12,000 on it when I bought it in 2016. I use 15/60 semi synthetic oil and change it every 6 or 7,000 km. It can be hot here (40+) and I often ride long distances at the speed limit (honestly, your honour). No sump extender. I add very little oil between changes.

I can only hope the figures add to the pool of knowledge so someone can work out what's going on.
2019 Kawasaki Z900rs
2008 Breva 750
1986 BMW R65

pete roper

  • Guest
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #18 on: November 05, 2019, 04:01:02 AM »
The thing is it's not a constant consumption problem overlooked by owners. It's a sudden, inexplicable, loss of large volumes, (As in all of it!) of oil. Bikes that won't use a drop for tens of thousands of km will suddenly do it! It's not easy to point at a 'Smoking Gun' when there isn't one.

The one thing that can be said is that whatever the cause it seems to have been fixed with the piston and ring changes on the later models.

That's all I can tell you and I've stripped two motors that have done this trick and could find no reason. That doesn't mean I didn't miss something but I'm no dummy and was looking for any hint of an explanation.

Pete

Offline hzbloke

  • Hatchling
  • **
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 93
  • Location: Bottom right corner of Oz
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #19 on: November 05, 2019, 04:17:19 AM »
Is my 2008 a 'later model' or does that refer to the single throttle bodies? Although I like my Breva a lot I'm not well versed in it's  pedigree.
2019 Kawasaki Z900rs
2008 Breva 750
1986 BMW R65

Online Kev m

  • Not your normal Hombre
  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 31277
  • Yo from Medford, NJ
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #20 on: November 05, 2019, 05:53:21 AM »
The single throttle body models debuted in 2012 (EU/world market) and 2013 (US/CA).

It came in the Stone/Special/Racer.

I don't believe there was ever a 1TB Breva variant, not sure if there was still a Nevada sold overseas, but there wasn't in the US at that point.

Visually the difference is obvious as the jugs are larger and a different shape as is the valve cover.

A similar visual change also happened with the introduction of the III which included new jugs and hemi heads.
Current Fleet

18 Guzzi V7III Carbon Dark
13 Guzzi V7 Stone
11 Duc M696

Offline malik

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 2395
  • Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #21 on: November 05, 2019, 06:02:10 AM »
very interesting, thanks for sharing.  Are the 2010 and 2011 both the twin TB models?  Was 2012 the year of the switch from twin to single TB's?

Dip stick blowing out seems like a crankcase venting issue.  Maybe related?

.........


The 2011 is also a 2TB. I think, at least in Oz, 2013 was the changeover year, but I'm no longer sure. All the Breva's & 750 Nevada IE, at least, were 2TB. The earlier Nevada's were carbureted (at least to around 2002). At some time, I note, there were 350 Nevada's.

I think the PO may have forgotten to tighten the dipstick fully, what with being paranoid about the oil level. The V7's didn't tend to lose their dipsticks, unlike some of the Breva's.
2010 V7 Classic, 2014 V7 Special
1996 1100 Sport Carb (in NZ), 2004 V11 LeMans (in UK)
Carberry Enfield V-Twin, 2008 Royal Enfield Electra, 2006 RE Electra 535

Online Kev m

  • Not your normal Hombre
  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 31277
  • Yo from Medford, NJ
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #22 on: November 05, 2019, 06:31:43 AM »
The dipstick thing doesn't seem to be related to crankcase pressure and it does indeed happen to V7 variants (including 1TB models). It's more of a vibration thing and if you lose the O-ring it can loosen and go bye-bye. Many things can keep it in place like tightening it well (use a small tool or some form of clasp/safety wire) but making sure the O-ring is still there is paramount.

As for identifying the different motors here are some visual aids.

Jay's first Guzzi (2TB V7C, maybe 2010 or 2011 IIRC) parked to the right of my first smallblock 1TB 2013 V7 Stone (first one delivered to FBF that wasn't the "demo" bike):









And here is our 2013 MKI V7 Stone again next to our 2018 V7III (Hemi head):






As you can see the visual cues at the jugs/heads are striking enough to catch your eye once you know for what to look.

« Last Edit: November 05, 2019, 06:46:19 AM by Kev m »
Current Fleet

18 Guzzi V7III Carbon Dark
13 Guzzi V7 Stone
11 Duc M696

Online SIR REAL ED

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2875
  • uh.... it's personal....
  • Location: Forest, VA
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #23 on: November 05, 2019, 06:37:10 AM »
The thing is it's not a constant consumption problem overlooked by owners. It's a sudden, inexplicable, loss of large volumes, (As in all of it!) of oil. Bikes that won't use a drop for tens of thousands of km will suddenly do it! It's not easy to point at a 'Smoking Gun' when there isn't one.

The one thing that can be said is that whatever the cause it seems to have been fixed with the piston and ring changes on the later models.

That's all I can tell you and I've stripped two motors that have done this trick and could find no reason. That doesn't mean I didn't miss something but I'm no dummy and was looking for any hint of an explanation.

Pete

That is one of the weirdest situations I have ever heard.  Seems to only happen in high mileage bikes?  I tend to think that the owners with high mileage bikes are the owners who are maintaining them well.

No smoking due to oil burning, no oil all over the back of the bike due to a seal or gasket going bad or a drain plug falling out, very strange indeed.  The owners must have been in a state of disbelief.

Pete, do you have any idea how many bikes this has happened to in total?
2019 Beta EVO 250
1999 Suzuki DR 650 w/790cc kit
1994, 2001, & 2002 MZ Skorpions

Online SIR REAL ED

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2875
  • uh.... it's personal....
  • Location: Forest, VA
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #24 on: November 05, 2019, 07:18:20 AM »


As for identifying the different motors here are some visual aids.

Jay's first Guzzi (2TB V7C, maybe 2010 or 2011 IIRC) parked to the right of my first smallblock 1TB 2013 V7 Stone (first one delivered to FBF that wasn't the "demo" bike):









And here is our 2013 MKI V7 Stone again next to our 2018 V7III (Hemi head):






As you can see the visual cues at the jugs/heads are striking enough to catch your eye once you know for what to look.

Kev, any significant performance differences between a twin TB 750 and a single TB 750?  If you close your eyes while riding, can you tell which bike you are on?
2019 Beta EVO 250
1999 Suzuki DR 650 w/790cc kit
1994, 2001, & 2002 MZ Skorpions

Online Kev m

  • Not your normal Hombre
  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 31277
  • Yo from Medford, NJ
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #25 on: November 05, 2019, 07:45:29 AM »
Kev, any significant performance differences between a twin TB 750 and a single TB 750?  If you close your eyes while riding, can you tell which bike you are on?

I could write a book.

Reader's Digest version - 2TB to MKI 1TB - no, 2TB or MkI TB to MKIII - YES.

Full version.

So about five years ago when I got the Stone and Jay got the 2TB V7C we took an afternoon to ride them back-to-back swapping on and off and took those photos. We also took the time to write a thread here on WG (you'd have to search the archives for it). Anyway the 2TB had about 10k miles on it at the time, my 1TB Stone maybe only 2k.

At the time our impression was the 2TB was "looser" or "freer reving" and that WAS true, but might not be if we checked today as Guzzis seem to loosen up in the first 10k miles. I definitely get the impression that our 2013 Mk I is "freer reving" than our new MK III.

We also noted that there was a difference in tuning and/or gearing between the 2TB and 1TB. Frankly the 1TB felt happier at lower rpm than the 2TB did. Maybe on average we were comfortably running her a good 300 rpm less.

But significant? No we felt there were other significant benefits to the 1TB (5.5g metal tank, even easier maintenance, gearing/tuning etc.) but not significant changes in power.

Fast forward to the introduction of the V7III (I'll skip the half-pregnant V7II) and I now think there is a significant power increase as well as many MANY small but that add up to significant chassis changes.

The Hemi-Head V7III is making 20-25% more rwhp but not at a cost of rpm, it remains making as much torque or more than the previous models from at least as low a point in the rpm range. It has the ABS and TC and a 6-spd (all things the V7II had), it has better (though still inexpensive) suspension, double-walled exhaust pipes, much nicer shifter/brake pedals and linkage, a larger rider triangle (greater distance from seat to pegs). All small, incremental, but positive changes in my book.

There are some potential negatives too - for an inexplicable reason the single instrument pod models have no tachometer (stupid decision) and the charging system capacity went DOWN with the MK1.5 wet alternators they use through the III models. But overall I'm VERY happy with our III.

I'm not getting rid of our MKI, but the III is definitively a "better" all around bike.

I will hopefully ride the MK I later today in order to vote, but I take the MK III out as much as I can.

I never was motivated enough to buy a 2TB model though I flirted with it from time-to-time and have ridden a number of them.
« Last Edit: November 05, 2019, 07:36:14 PM by Kev m »
Current Fleet

18 Guzzi V7III Carbon Dark
13 Guzzi V7 Stone
11 Duc M696

Online SIR REAL ED

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2875
  • uh.... it's personal....
  • Location: Forest, VA
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #26 on: November 05, 2019, 06:35:34 PM »
Thanks for the information Kev.  Always interesting to witness product development/evolution.  Learning from the experienced is much less painful than blind ignorance, er, uh, I mean enthusiasm.  The Reader's Digest version won't max out storage on my hard drive.

I'm not too far from having this thing right.  All the rest is simple, no-brainer stuff, that doesn't really need to be done, but is satisfying to have it done right, especially if I am the one who is going to ride the bike.  I'm savoring the tinkering in order to avoid getting another project.  No point in rushing now that the cooler weather is coming, and I'm two weeks out from a hip replacement.

I think it was one of Peter Egan's friends who talked about appreciating the "project repellent" one already has in their garage.  IIRC, the gist was "Don't get upset about a $1000 project that you are not able to make any progress on, because that $1000 project is currently repelling a $5000 project that you probably would not be able to make any progress on either!"

So ya from jersey?  wat exit?
2019 Beta EVO 250
1999 Suzuki DR 650 w/790cc kit
1994, 2001, & 2002 MZ Skorpions

Online Kev m

  • Not your normal Hombre
  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 31277
  • Yo from Medford, NJ
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #27 on: November 05, 2019, 07:38:59 PM »
Well technically I'm from Manhattan, but I lived most my life in PA till my darling wife, fresh off 28 years of school decided to get a job and upended us. We landed in South Jersey, just miles from a 100,000 acres of pines. Not what most people think of when they think NJ.

But I'm starting to think maybe that's cause the locals want it that way.
Current Fleet

18 Guzzi V7III Carbon Dark
13 Guzzi V7 Stone
11 Duc M696

Online SIR REAL ED

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2875
  • uh.... it's personal....
  • Location: Forest, VA
Re: oil burning, twin Throttle Body vs. single Throttle Body
« Reply #28 on: November 05, 2019, 09:15:12 PM »
Well technically I'm from Manhattan, but I lived most my life in PA till my darling wife, fresh off 28 years of school decided to get a job and upended us. We landed in South Jersey, just miles from a 100,000 acres of pines. Not what most people think of when they think NJ.

But I'm starting to think maybe that's cause the locals want it that way.

Amen.  I got signs on my land:

CAUTION:
BIGFOOT
BREEDING
AREA

AVOID EYE
CONTACT
2019 Beta EVO 250
1999 Suzuki DR 650 w/790cc kit
1994, 2001, & 2002 MZ Skorpions


NEW WILDGUZZI PRODUCT - Moto Guzzi Door Mat
Receive donation credit with door mat purchase!
Advertise Here
 


NEW WILDGUZZI PRODUCT - Moto Guzzi Door Mat
Receive donation credit with door mat purchase!
Advertise Here