Author Topic: Physics of a Wheelie  (Read 1117 times)


Online Moparnut72

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 2859
  • Location: Quincy California
Re: Physics of a Wheelie
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2022, 05:24:26 PM »
This is quite a bit different from what we have been told for years. Things from the chain pulling on the top of the sprocket to the angle of the swingarm. I think is is a combination of multiple factors,  but what do I know.
kk
Mopar or Nocar
2023 V100 Navale
2019 V7lll Special
MGNOC #24053
Amiga computer shop owner: "Americans are great consumers but terrible shoppers".

Offline nc43bsa

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 1425
  • Location: Mooresville NC
Re: Physics of a Wheelie
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2022, 10:27:54 PM »
I remember my Ducati 900SS wouldn't wheelie under any circumstances.

I found out later it was mostly because the crankshaft rotated in the opposite direction as the wheels.
1990 MilleGT

Offline Dukedesmo

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 607
  • Location: England
Re: Physics of a Wheelie
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2022, 04:55:02 AM »


Quote from: nc43bsa on Today at 04:27:54 AM
I remember my Ducati 900SS wouldn't wheelie under any circumstances.

I found out later it was mostly because the crankshaft rotated in the opposite direction as the wheels.

___________________ ___________________ ________

Strange because Ducati V-twins are renowned for their wheelieability. I've got both a 916 and a Monster 900 and both are very easily wheelied, especially the Monster (same powerplant as the SS) also, the crankshaft rotates in the same direction as the wheels - though not sure if that makes any difference? (or were you joking?).
My Guzzi, on the other hand is not really up to it (though doubtless some will say otherwise) due to the fact that it's long, too heavy and lacking the power to get it airborne plus, I'm not sure the clutch is man enough to take the abuse?
To clarify, I'm not into wheelies. I used to do or at least try to do them in my youth but it didn't always go to plan and now I'm too old to be falling off the back plus, I don't want to be breaking my bikes in doing so.


Le Mans II
Ducati 916
Ducati M900

Offline guzziart

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 1050
  • Location: Northeast Ohio
Re: Physics of a Wheelie
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2022, 06:15:24 AM »
Good video explaining the physics of a wheelie....even I understood it. :laugh:
'72 CL350, '72 Eldo '87 LMIVSE, '91 CT70, '08 Wing, '23 v85 Travel

Offline moto

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 987
  • Fear the deer!
  • Location: Madison, WI
Re: Physics of a Wheelie
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2022, 08:26:33 AM »
This is quite a bit different from what we have been told for years. Things from the chain pulling on the top of the sprocket to the angle of the swingarm. I think is is a combination of multiple factors,  but what do I know.
kk

It is. This is mathematically analyzed in Vittore Cossalter, Motorcycle Dynamics, chapter 6, "Motorcycle Trim," especially section 6.3, "Motorcycle trim in accelerated motion." The tendency to wheelie also depends on rear wheel squat (in the squat ratio, R), which differs with the type (chain, shaft, paralever/CARC) and geometry of the drive.
850 T-3
Griso 1100 corretto
2023 Royal Enfield Classic 350
Italjet Buccaneer 250 (ex-SSR) -- now sold
credit for 2500+ postings lost in the database meltdown of Feb 9, 2020

Offline Huzo

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 13828
  • Location: Creswick Australia
Re: Physics of a Wheelie
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2022, 10:55:28 AM »
I remember my Ducati 900SS wouldn't wheelie under any circumstances.

I found out later it was mostly because the crankshaft rotated in the opposite direction as the wheels.
Nah…Irrelevant.
The torque is still being put into the rear hub, how many times it changes direction on the way down there means nothing.
The mass of the bike does not want to move forward and the resistance of the wheel to turning, imparts an equal and opposite torque the other way.
Imagine viewing a helicopter from above and disconnecting the rear rotor, or even better.
Hold an electric drill with one hand and feel what happens when the drill bit jams or starts to seize. The torque will be imparted back through the system.
The bike wants to rotate around the rear sprocket with exactly the same torque as it’s putting into the wheel, but the CofM has too long an arm and the vertical component is too great.
Imagine you have 800 Nm and gently let the clutch out on level ground, there is little resistance to forward motion, so the wheel can turn and the bike will gently accelerate.
But if you stick a bar in the spokes, it will rotate over backwards irregardless (sic) of the direction of the crank rotation.

Just a thought experiment.
If you laid your SS on it’s side with the frame clear of the ground and clamped the wheel, when you fed the clutch out it would rotate around the wheel.
It would be pulling a wheelie, but on it’s side.
Also, remember the CofM is about 0.5 metres above the road and the tyre contact patch is at road level.
That is also applying a couple that wants to flip over.
« Last Edit: September 08, 2022, 11:01:05 AM by Huzo »

 

20 Ounce Stainless Steel Double Insulated Tumbler
Buy a quality tumbler and support the forum at the same time!
Better than a YETI! BPA and Lead free.
Advertise Here