New Moto Guzzi Door Mats Available Now
...... perhaps these biased eyes have been looking at the GB350 for too long and wondering out loud why the heck the rest of the world gets to enjoy that bike and not us here in ‘Murica
…and goshdang I want a modern Galletto.
It is strange how almost all of the motorcycle OEMs have decided to all but abandon the beginner bike market. Back in the 1970's all the Japanese OEMs had "familys" of bikes. You could almost look at the line ups and guess the rider ages they were targeting. I suspect market research says internal combustion engine vehicles don't appeal to the younger potential buyers.Demographics rule I suppose....
…Husqvarna 401 Triumph Speed 400, Scrambler 400X…
A 500cc single and a 1000cc 120-degree twin based on the same architecture would be cool and would look back at successful racing designs of the past. (yes I know those were 500cc twins based on the 250cc architecture).bicilindrica !!!Seems like everyone is releasing 400cc-500cc singles these days. It would be a way to share lots of parts between two models.
..a KL250 would have been better.
1980s Guzzi prototype big single. Mono 670Around 1987, given the great popularity enjoyed by enduro bikes powered by the large-displacement single-cylinder engine, Tonti decided to build an engine of this type. The project was designated M 71 and led to the construction of several prototypes, duly tested on the bench. It was a water-cooled "mono" with dual overhead camshafts and four valves, featuring two auxiliary balance shafts driven by a double-toothed belt. To minimize the engine's vertical bulk, dry sump lubrication was adopted. The crankshaft was monolithic and operated entirely on bushings. The water pump was driven by the rear auxiliary shaft. A toothed belt was used to drive the timing, but a switch to a chain drive was planned. This 670cc single-cylinder engine, a displacement achieved by combining a 102mm bore and 82mm stroke, delivered a power output exceeding 60 horsepower on the test bench, a true record for the time. After all, Tonti was a true racer... Another article.Tonti also dared to use a single-cylinder engine for a supposed trail range (and surely some sporty one to compete with the beautiful Gilera Saturno 500). It was apparently developed in 1987 and was certainly totally modern: 670cc (102x82mm), liquid cooling, double overhead camshafts driven by a toothed belt, four valves per cylinder, two balance shafts to mitigate vibrations and dry sump lubrication, making it very compact. It was said that on the test bench it produced 60 hp (barely 48 hp for the Japanese single-cylinder engines of the time), but as I mentioned in " some trail bikes from the 80s and 90s that set the course ", in those years single-cylinder trail bikes were beginning to fall into disrepair, unable to stop the twin-cylinder engines and their greater road capabilities. Yes, it would have been above the Gilera Bi4 engine and on par with the Suzuki DR 800 Big, but Moto Guzzi decided not to continue with the project.
Fascinating. Reminds me of the japanes deciding to abandon two strokes.
Fascinating. Reminds me of the japanes deciding to abandon two strokes.Same time frame as Yamaha's SRX600 which sold like lead balloons in the US.
I’m finding projections and data aligning to my observation that single-cylinder bikes are rising, particularly in the US. Gas prices rising, cost of living, cities becoming denser, congested.
IMO, the SRX600 (and SR500, later SR400) would have sold better if they had electric start.
I live in a suburban metro. The local Triumph dealer sells more 400s than anything else. All to older grey beards who are downsizing for one reason, or another. These guys don't care about gas prices and we don't really have any big city congestion. They're buying them because they're light, fun, cheap. They're aging baby boomers and older Gen Xers who could buy anything on the lot, but choose lightweight fun. Major trend going on that Guzzi really should be capitalizing. But they won't. We'll just get bold new graphics on a V7 variant.
Out of curiosity, disregarding emissions laws and market driven issues, what is the sane engineering upper limit displacement for a single cylinder / drive shaft bike?