New Moto Guzzi Door Mats Available Now
Use of deadly force laws only apply to such force used against a PERSON. Doubtful that any prosecutor would "run you through the wringer" for killing an aggressive dog. Little to be gained by him to do that.
Go ahead discharge a firearm in a residential area. See what happens or for that matter. Discharge one in an urban area. My point being use of a firearm can lead you into a lot of trouble if discharged in the wrong area even if the reason maybe correct. Don't keep your fingers crossed when a young prosecutor is looking at filing charges.
So George , you are saying don't flip off the dog ??? Dusty
Not if it's a police K9!
One of our K9 officers here is a buddy , he has a retired K9 officer at home , Spike , what a great dog . Of course I am always on my best behavior around Spike Dusty
I was a K9 officer too at one point in my career. I never ever had to worry about my dog when off duty, his temperament was that good. Until one day we had a contractor working on the second floor of our home and he came down the stairs holding a screw gun in his hand. Thankfully he didn't bite him but ran at him and growled and backed him into a corner and wouldn't let him move.
If the reason is correct, end of story. But like I said, and think we are saying the same thing, laws and the interpretation and implementation of those laws do vary depending on location. I was in law enforcement for 40 years. I can give many examples of the wide latitude police and prosecutors have. Same state, same laws, but different counties in NJ- In one county (a very busy, urban one) a police officer was stabbed in the hand. Charge was assault. Case was downgraded to municipal court and the assailant received a $75 fine. In another very rural county, a person gave the middle finger out his car window as he passed a police officer. He was also charged with assault. He was convicted and at sentencing the judge cited his previous criminal history and he actually served six months in the county jail.
The one variable that you didn't throw in is that you were or still are a cop. You could get away with carrying and discharging a firearm than the rest of us shmoes.
My comments had nothing to do with my experiences or what I could or could not 'get away with'. And given today's climate, I don't think I could get away with more than anyone else. And that's how it should be.
While I tend to agree with you on more scrutiny on LEO's. There is in reality "professional courtesy" given to LEO's. They do it out here. No complaint on my end just an observation. To bring it back to the OP's post. If I was to use a firearm vs you using one in your area under the same conditions. I would be under closer scrutiny than you because of the LEO ties. Just a fact. You're a trained LEO vs a trained CCW. LEO vs. civilian. Different scenario.