New Moto Guzzi Door Mats Available Now
From my own experience and from the reports I get from many Triumph riders, Triumph is head and shoulders above other European bike manufacturers (BMW, Guzzi, Ducati etc) in reliability. They are also right where they need to be with diversity of product line, power and style. My next new bike may be a Triumph.
But my anecdotal experience for Ducati is how much better can you get than 0 problems.Granted, we're just shy of 10k miles in 4 years, but I think my little bro (JAS67) probably has that on his 796 in about 2 years. And I think neither one of us has had even the slightest hint of an issue.If we're typical, then Ducati is up there too.
I'm at 7k on my 796 with nearly zero problems. I say nearly, because, occasionally, as in, maybe 3 times in the time I've had the bike (only bike I ever bought new), it failed to start despite cranking plenty fast. The solution is to wait 5 minutes or more, and try again.Otherwise, absolutely trouble free, and a complete joy to ride.As for BMW, I'm at 14k miles on my F800GT that I bought last year with 5k miles on it. I have had zero problems during that 9k miles.My Moto Guzzi Small Block ownership has been fairly trouble free. The V7R (now has 9k miles) had a leaky rear shock at 5k miles, replaced under warranty, and my 2014 V7S had the muffler-turned brown problem when I got it at 976 miles, but, it's run great the entire time I've had it (1 year, now has 5,4xx miles). Aside from cold start issues when I first got it, that were made better with a refresh, my 2009 V7C didn't have any problems while I had it. I had that one 2 years, from 1,800 miles to just over 10k miles.
Triumphs, I have Triumphs, this is one of mine...This one is quite fast, dangerous and reliable for a few miles at a time... I know very little about the modern Bonnevilles..to me they look bloated... but many new bikes are bulky... but they have a following and perform nicely and that's what really is important
Fast eh? Like what? 10-second fast?And, I dunno man, but what's the wheelbase on that thing? There's a certain irony of pointing that out and calling say even a new Street or Thruxton "bloated". No?
It's supposed to be sarcastic and it's obviously not a street bike ..Yes, 10 second 1/4 fast, 130 HP, 460 pounds...It was out on the road for testing ,my race rider says it accelerates faster than his 2010 1050 Speed Triple... Bloated? It's a dedicated land speed racing bike with vintage push rod engines on a 72 inch wheel base...the engines are 12 inches wide, 16 inches at the splayed exhaust pipes.. Obviously modern bikes can't be designed to be slim like old Brit bikes. They need bulkier engines to house more robust internals..But to me, many modern bikes look bloated..Just my opinion....
I got that, and as you point out it may be quick, but you can see the irony of calling the modern street bikes bloated when you can pick up a 480# 125 rwhp modern Triumph "bloated looking" streetbike that will run circles around it literally since it can handle and do things like, I dunno, generally be ridden more than a mile or two at a time.
Kev, it's a vintage engine straight line race bike .It has no other purpose. You do understand that? It's like saying, on a different level, a Pro Street drag bike with 400 HP is useless for a road race..... ... I believe your argument is out of gas
OK, I think maybe 2 times in 4 years our 696 did that too... like it flooded itself on cold start enrichment and then cleared when left to sit for 5 minutes. I'd forgotten about that since it's been so long.As for your smallblock ownership - are you not forgetting about a new voltage regulator, a couple of fuel filters, and a disappearing dipstick?
I absolutely realize that - which is why I found the humor lacking in your original joke/sarcastic point - or stated another way, why it doesn't make any sense whatsoever to call a modern streetbike bloated in comparison.Or stated yet another way - we're probably just miscommunicating.
For sure miscommunication... Let me restate my opinion of what is a bloated bike...They are too large for the styling ..Does that make sense? Keep in mind this is my personal opinion... I went to look at a Suzuki SL1000 on Craig's list. The bike was huge and dense and tall , photos didn't look like that to me. This is how the Modern Bonneville looks to me, too large for the styling like a caricature...Maybe I'm just used to seeing the same styling clues on the much smaller vintage Triumphs.. Again this is just my personal opinion ...
That's cool, I'm not going to argue opinion, especially a visual one.But I've got some follow up questions along the bloated perception topic.Have you sat on or ridden the Street yet?Have you sat on or ridden a W650?I realize some people thought the air-cooled T100 serious was a bit big compared to the original Bonnies. It never bothered me (I started on a Suzuki GS550E which was pretty big, and quickly bought my first Sportster, so you can guess why it never felt that way to me, though I also had a VT500 Ascot which was downright tiny, too small to my perception.)Anyway I've heard many people say the size of the W650 was closer to the original Bonnie than those T100s. I've got some miles on a buddy's W650 and I love it, reminds me of the V7 in a lot of ways, and the V7 is about as small a bike as I want.I've not ridden the Street yet, but spent some time crawling around it, and it looks diminutive to my eye. But again, that could be perception. Still I think it's closer to the W650/V7 than the previous T100 series.Thoughts?
Yes, I've ridden a W650 - great bike! Yes, I owned a 2001 Bonneville (early one), and it was also a great all around motorcycle. No bad Triumph variants listed (IMHO), - just choose the one that "floats your boat" emotionally...and then "fits your riding needs", practically. When I think about Triumphs that are NOT "bloated" the vintage Meriden's always come to mind... This is my old 1970 Triumph T100C Trophy 500. Cool bike! freeimageupload
Well damnit , Rough and I agree on something , we both prefer our women sans makeup Obviously I am just being a troublemaker , as we agree on lots of things , or at least it seems we do , right Tony ? Tony , right , Tony ... Dusty