New Moto Guzzi Door Mats Available Now
Rotax four stroke aircraft engines have water cooled heads and air cooled barrels. The idea in that application is that the heads need to be water cooled because of the power density of the engine at full power, but air cooling the barrels in the event of cooling system failure you can limp home at reduce power. Not so much a factor for a motorcycle engine but something to consider - one reason I prefer air cooled engines is reliability.
Most Japanese engines will go 100,000 miles without ever cracking the engine open to fix something that they didn't do correctly.
Most well maintained Guzzi engines easily go over 100,000 miles. Ask Karl Werth.
So the've half arsed it!
If the Hydro motor was a v-8 it would have 260 cubic inch displacement and 300 h.p. while being dependable and getting 40 plus miles per gallon. The 1100 Guzzi engine is a very well balanced package.
I assumed he was referring to models such as the flat tappet 8V, or hydro Calis which MIGHT fit that bill after the recalls, but certainly didn't before.
Rotax four stroke aircraft engines have water cooled heads and air cooled barrels. The idea in that application is that the heads need to be water cooled because of the power density of the engine at full power, but with air cooled barrels in the event of cooling system failure you can limp home at reduced power.
Your comment reminds me of Cadillac's Northstar engine with its "limp home" fail-safe mode which allowed the engine to continue running for a limited time without any coolant. Fuel would be supplied to only one cylinder bank in turn, and the inactive bank would be "air cooled" internally. This was made possible by the engine's all-aluminum construction and large oil capacity.
Jeez, how bad are you engines if you have to design such an extreme limp mode?
High power engines do not by definition shed lots of heat. The amount of heat rejected by an engine is a function of the power it is making at any given time, which has nothing to do with the rated power of the engine, and the thermal efficiency of the engine. It is true that higher powered engines tend to be less efficient in low power operation, but I think the main reason higher powered water cooled engines feel hot to the rider is that heat is rejected by the radiator at the relatively low temperature of the coolant instead of the higher CHT of an air cooled engine. That means more volume of cooling air is required to do the job, and more heated air blowing back at the rider
Now there are some semantics. OK, high power engines must have the ability to shed lots of heat.And it is not insignificant. If a high powered bike gets 35mph, and a low power guzzi gets 55mph, both while cruising at 65mph, which bike is burning more calories and must shed more heat, thus being more likely to cook the rider?While I see your point about the radiater heating a larger volume of air (but to a lower degree of heat), the KTM riders who complain about heat sure seem focused on the rear cylinder/rear pipe as being the source. As the V-twins have grown larger and larger, the heat problems have increased. Even at idle, a 1200 water cooled engine capable of making 160hp is going to put out significantly more heat than a V7 motoguzzi capable of making 50 hp, which is a big reason the 1200 will drink more gas for a given distance, at the same speed. My 690KTM, which is water cooled, but gets relatively the same fuel mileage as my V7iii, puts out no more or little more noticeable heat than the V7iii.
The novelty starts with the engine - which will see a potential (1000-1200 cc) capacity - that will have nothing to do with current Big Bore or Small Block and will adopt a mixed cooling system with the head part cooled to liquid while lower air cylinders should remain cool for the cylinders. This will be the engine of the new course, as will be the concept built around it.
Swollen stitches? Can hardly wait for that.Moto