Author Topic: Motus merged threadfest  (Read 181479 times)

SpadaISSIMO

  • Guest
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #180 on: December 22, 2011, 04:01:10 PM »
Sounds nice too...distinct...St ill think a Lafranconi'd Guzzi sounds better though...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DByGC5AlY0&list=UUqY2gtg98hXWzsUkm2Xh_jw&index=1&feature=plcp

Sorry if the vids are a repost...I know the Motus has been mentioned here before.

Bill Hagan

  • Guest
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #181 on: December 22, 2011, 04:52:38 PM »
Don't know if that's been here before or not, but I liked watching it.  Well put together vid.  Wish Guzzi had dollars and sense to do something similar with any of its models.

Naturally, I got sucked in by y/t and watched a few more, too.

I am not enchanted with that sound, either, but am taken by the whole concept.  Wish those folks very well, and, if time, money, and other realities not in the way, would love to have one. 

Heck, if my PowerBall investment plans work out, I'll buy a couple of 'em.   :D

Bill

Offline radlefty

  • Gaggle Mentor
  • ****
  • Posts: 564
  • Location: Minneapolis, Mn
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #182 on: December 22, 2011, 06:21:38 PM »
 Seen several posts and videos about the Motus, but I hadn't seen this one yet. I am really intrigued by this bike. It will mostly likely be way out of my budget, but damn I'd like to get a  test ride on one.
It's alway's about the journey... Wherever you go, there you are.

Bikeless in Mpls

Offline fotoguzzi

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 19981
  • vee git tooh soon oldt und too late wise -my Dad
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #183 on: December 22, 2011, 08:16:15 PM »
thanks for posting! I want that thing! sound is Great! loose the red rocker covers tho..how about some high tech clear pyrex or something unusual.. red is over done..
MINNEAPOLIS, MN

Offline Arizona Wayne

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 6257
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #184 on: March 10, 2012, 11:35:20 AM »
www.superbikeplanet .com   go to News for more info.

Offline AJ Huff

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 4215
  • Location: College Community IA
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #185 on: March 10, 2012, 03:53:18 PM »
The email I received from them yesterday said pricing and availability would be announced at Bike Week in Daytona.

-AJ
'71 Ambassador
'01 California Special
'05 Road King
MGNOC# L-753

Offline sbaker

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 5990
  • Piaggio Stock Holder
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #186 on: March 10, 2012, 05:08:12 PM »

Motuses, or Motum?...
Sam
Dallas, TX

AGATT

Hey Check out my CD www.cdbaby.com/bakersam

Current
Norge Wing: White Squadron
Ducati 900ss

Previous
Griso Wing: Yellow Squadron (shot down 3/11)
2008 Norge - Red... fastest of the 2V
1975 Convert + Sidecar - Fun
2004 California EV Touring

Offline bad Chad

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • Posts: 9764
  • Location: Central Il
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #187 on: March 10, 2012, 05:22:39 PM »
Yep, and then the howls will come about how it soooo $$$!
2007 Breva 1100  Red Arrow (and faster than yours!)
2016 CSC 250TT Zongshen
2017 V9 Roamer

radan2

  • Guest
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #188 on: March 10, 2012, 09:09:51 PM »
Motuses, or Motum?...


If they are masculine, Moti

If feminine, Motae (this is unlikely, given the -us ending)

If it is a fourth declension noun, it would be Motus, but the u would be long.

Offline Sack

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 1645
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #189 on: March 10, 2012, 10:05:43 PM »
'08 Norge and (mint) 1984 Honda VF700F Interceptor

Offline rocker59

  • Global Moderator
  • Gaggle Hero
  • *
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 24267
  • "diplomatico di moto"
  • Location: Aux Arcs
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #190 on: March 11, 2012, 10:22:30 AM »
Yep, and then the howls will come about how it soooo $$$!

Cool bike.  I have lots of respect for thier effort.

If the bike is less than $25,000, I'll be surprised.
Michael T.
Aux Arcs de Akansea
2017 Triumph T100 Bonneville
"Do what you can, with what you have, where you are." - Theodore Roosevelt

Offline kevdog3019

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 5648
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #191 on: March 11, 2012, 10:39:33 AM »
My feeling is if it's much over $20k it will be a tough sell.  I just think $20k is a breaking point for cycles.  It should be pretty outrageous if it tips that line.  Cool bikes for sure, but not that much cooler than a Guzzi.  Just my two pennies.
-Kevin 
'86 V65 "Super" Lario
'85 Honda Nighthawk 700s
'86 V65 Lario

Offline JJ

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 19866
  • Life is meant to ENJOY...not "endure."
  • Location: Village of Oak Creek, Arizona
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #192 on: March 11, 2012, 10:50:03 AM »
Cool bike.  I have lots of respect for thier effort.

If the bike is less than $25,000, I'll be surprised.

(+1) Agreed....they are a nice bike....but not that nice (IMHO) :)
Life Member: MGNOC L-772, AMA, HOG,
Village of Oak Creek, Arizona
Current bike: 2025 Moto Morini Calibro 700
Previous Guzzi's owned:
* '78 850 Le Mans
* '02 V11 Le Mans
* '93 SP1000-III
* '83 850 Le Mans III
* '98 V10 Centauro GT

Offline Arizona Wayne

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 6257
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #193 on: March 11, 2012, 12:45:20 PM »
If the bike isn't priced in the Goldilocks' zone the company will be belly up before the economy recovers.... if it ever does ::) They need a bread&butter ride to keep the company going until the flagship model's sales take off. What the Isetta did for BMW. BMW built several post-war cars that were beautiful classics, but too damn pricey for the European economy. They finally came to their senses and bought the production rights for the Isetta from Count Iso, and that funny little egg-shaped car made BMW profitable again. With the possibility of economic recovery being stifled by the fear of $5.00/gal gas prices, Motus should be thinking more Cub than Wing.





I don't know about that.  Right now BMW and Ducati sales are up when everything else is down.  Rich people still have the $ to spend.   :)  Your references are for mfg.s looking for gross sales.  Motus isn't about that.

You wouldn't like to pull up to a biker hangout on a Motus ??
« Last Edit: March 11, 2012, 12:50:22 PM by Arizona Wayne »

Offline kevdog3019

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 5648
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #194 on: March 11, 2012, 02:34:05 PM »




I don't know about that.  Right now BMW and Ducati sales are up when everything else is down.  Rich people still have the $ to spend.   :)  Your references are for mfg.s looking for gross sales.  Motus isn't about that.

You wouldn't like to pull up to a biker hangout on a Motus ??

How about on a Guzzi.  They know less about Guzzi's probably.  When you come to market it's best to sell as many as you can for exposure.  As that happens you can raise prices because there's demand.  At a premium price point that won't happen.  Few sales, low exposure, hard to convince dealers to carry them= hard to stay in business.
'86 V65 "Super" Lario
'85 Honda Nighthawk 700s
'86 V65 Lario

Offline rocker59

  • Global Moderator
  • Gaggle Hero
  • *
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 24267
  • "diplomatico di moto"
  • Location: Aux Arcs
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #195 on: March 11, 2012, 06:42:54 PM »
It really needs to be somewhere in the $15k to $18k range IMHO.

Over $18k, and potential customers will be few and far between. 

At $25k, which is where I think it'll be, they're going to sell a few to well-heeled clients, but it won't be enough to keep them going for very long.

Michael T.
Aux Arcs de Akansea
2017 Triumph T100 Bonneville
"Do what you can, with what you have, where you are." - Theodore Roosevelt

Offline Arizona Wayne

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 6257
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #196 on: March 11, 2012, 06:49:32 PM »
How about on a Guzzi.  They know less about Guzzi's probably.  When you come to market it's best to sell as many as you can for exposure.  As that happens you can raise prices because there's demand.  At a premium price point that won't happen.  Few sales, low exposure, hard to convince dealers to carry them= hard to stay in business.




It's harder to raise a price than to lower it.

Offline Lannis

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 26504
  • Location: Central Virginia
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #197 on: March 11, 2012, 06:54:25 PM »




I don't know about that.  Right now BMW and Ducati sales are up when everything else is down.  Rich people still have the $ to spend.   :)  


You mean Rich People like the ones with three or four or five or six nice motorcycles together worth about 30- or $40,000, and a car for Mom that cost $30,000, and a 4WD truck that cost $30,000?    That kind of Rich People?    ??? 

A whole punkload of us on this very board resemble that characterization .....   ;)

I'll bet it will be between $25,000 and $30,000.   About the same as a farkled-up BMW or Wing or HD.   Will they sell?   Time will tell .....    :pop

Lannis
"Hard pounding, this, gentlemen; let's see who pounds the longest".

Offline Lannis

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 26504
  • Location: Central Virginia
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #198 on: March 11, 2012, 08:28:19 PM »



I have 8- 2/3wheelers, a 3/4T PU, a Toyhauler trailer, a small SUV, a paid for house, but I'm NOT rich !  Never have been.   :)

I'm not interested in buying a Motus, but I'd like to see/hear 1 up close just the same.   ;D

Well no, YOU'RE not rich.   You can't be.   To be considered "rich", you have to have more money than the person doing the considering.

Be that as it may, I think the reason that the Motus is so interesting is:

1) It's a sport-tourer, my favorite flavor of motorcycle.

2) It's NOT a foggy copy of some dead brand (Excelsior, Henderson, Indian, Norton, etc) and it's NOT a poser copy of a Harley Davidson, and it's NOT some unrideable exercise in excess (bikes with Corvette engines, etc).  It looks like it's meant to be a real, practical motorcycle.   Problem is, they won't be able to amortize their startup and ongoing operations costs over 100,000 units.    They'll be asking quite a bit more than people will be willing to pay for a new, untried thing.  I wish them luck; but those who can't remember Hesketh are condemned to repeat it ....

Lannis
"Hard pounding, this, gentlemen; let's see who pounds the longest".

Offline Chuck in Indiana

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • *
  • *
  • Posts: 29637
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #199 on: March 11, 2012, 08:31:26 PM »



I have 8- 2/3wheelers, a 3/4T PU, a Toyhauler trailer, a small SUV, a paid for house, but I'm NOT rich !  Never have been.   :)

I'm not interested in buying a Motus, but I'd like to see/hear 1 up close just the same.   ;D

Did that. Sat on it, made it go vroom vroom. Couldn't talk him into letting me go for a putt.  ;D Sounds bitchin. Ergos are excellent. Do you know that the president of motus' dad is Sydney Conn, the Guzzi Guy? I've been in manufacturing all my life, and this bike is EXPENSIVE. There are plenty of people with the coin to buy something like this, but do they want a high performance sport touring bike? Time will tell, and I wish them well.

Chuck in (Elwood) Indiana/sometimes SoCal
 
87 AeroLario
95 Skorpion tour
25 Triumph Speed 900
 "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe."
Albert Einstein

Offline rboe

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 5086
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #200 on: March 11, 2012, 08:55:23 PM »
I'm scared off by the exclusive limited first production run. Oiy! Does not sound cheap to me!
Phoenix, AZ
2000 Quota 1100 ES Black (sold & gone)
2008 Honda XR650L
2012 Griso SE
2013 Honda CB1100

Offline Unkept

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 2206
    • Unkept Uncaged- Youtube Channel
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #201 on: March 16, 2012, 12:33:32 PM »
http://blog.al.com/businessnews/2012/03/bike_to_the_future_motus_motor.html

2013 Motus MST
Base price: $30,975
Colors: Speed silver metallic or flame red metallic
Engine: V-4 Baby Block, 1650cc liquid cooled, 165 horsepower, six-speed, dual overdrive, electronic fuel injection
Tires and wheels: Aluminum wheels with wave rotors and Michelin tires
Options: Adjustable handlebars, heated seat, heated grips


2013 Motus MST-R
Base price: $36,975
Colors: Strong white or carbon black
Engine: V-4R Baby Block, 1650cc liquid cooled, 185 horsepower, six-speed, dual overdrive, electronic fuel injection
Tires and wheels: Forged OZ aluminum wheels with wave rotors and Michelin tires
Options: Heated seat, heated grips, rear storage rack, premium low seat, touring windscreen

You can buy two-three Griso SE's for that price!
« Last Edit: March 16, 2012, 12:36:29 PM by Unkept »

Offline Lannis

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 26504
  • Location: Central Virginia
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #202 on: March 16, 2012, 12:37:41 PM »
http://blog.al.com/businessnews/2012/03/bike_to_the_future_motus_motor.html

2013 Motus MST
Base price: $30,975
Colors: Speed silver metallic or flame red metallic
Engine: V-4 Baby Block, 1650cc liquid cooled, 165 horsepower, six-speed, dual overdrive, electronic fuel injection
Tires and wheels: Aluminum wheels with wave rotors and Michelin tires
Options: Adjustable handlebars, heated seat, heated grips


2013 Motus MST-R
Base price: $36,975
Colors: Strong white or carbon black
Engine: V-4R Baby Block, 1650cc liquid cooled, 185 horsepower, six-speed, dual overdrive, electronic fuel injection
Tires and wheels: Forged OZ aluminum wheels with wave rotors and Michelin tires
Options: Heated seat, heated grips, rear storage rack, premium low seat, touring windscreen

You can buy two-three Griso SE's for that price!

Well, the normal Guzzi strategy would be to wait till 2016 and then buy the new unsold ones at a 40% discount ....

Lannis
"Hard pounding, this, gentlemen; let's see who pounds the longest".

Offline Unkept

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 2206
    • Unkept Uncaged- Youtube Channel
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #203 on: March 16, 2012, 01:01:10 PM »
Well, the normal Guzzi strategy would be to wait till 2016 and then buy the new unsold ones at a 40% discount ....

Lannis

That's still almost $20k.... Which if you wait for Griso SE's to be 60% of their price they would be $7500  ;D

BigRooster

  • Guest
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #204 on: March 16, 2012, 01:02:41 PM »
Well no, YOU'RE not rich.   You can't be.   To be considered "rich", you have to have more money than the person doing the considering.

Lannis

Small quibble:  one must not  make more money than another to be considered rich.  One must possess more money than another to be considered rich.  It's not the number of toys or cars or houses - only net worth and even that can be parsed when dissected further.  I think the down economy proved that while many appeared rich they were actually huge debtors financing luxuries with unrealized housing gains or fragile paychecks, leaving little in reserve.

Back to Motus - I hope they succeed but $30K is a big number.  However, I don’t beleive selling lots of bikes is the end game for Motus.  I feel they are looking to become something of a tier one supplier to established brands, like Rotax, or an engineering partner like Lotus.  That scenario would make the bike basically a proof of concept, but I have nothing to base that on other than conjecture.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2012, 01:04:50 PM by BigRooster »

Offline Unkept

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 2206
    • Unkept Uncaged- Youtube Channel
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #205 on: March 16, 2012, 01:06:08 PM »
Small quibble:  one must not  make more money than another to be considered rich.  One must possess more money than another to be considered rich.  It's not the number of toys or cars or houses - only net worth and even that can be parsed when dissected further.  I think the down economy proved that while many appeared rich they were actually huge debtors financing luxuries with unrealized housing gains or fragile paychecks, leaving little in reserve.

Back to Motus - I hope they succeed but $30K is a big number.  However, I don’t beleive selling lots of bikes is the end game for Motus.  I feel they are looking to become something of a tier one supplier to established brands, like Rotax, or an engineering partner like Lotus.  That scenario would make the bike basically a proof of concept, but I have nothing to base that on other than conjecture.


Well it would make sense, as they plan to offer their baby block engine for sale separately from the bike.

Offline Lannis

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 26504
  • Location: Central Virginia
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #206 on: March 16, 2012, 01:16:35 PM »
Small quibble:  one must not  make more money than another to be considered rich.  One must possess more money than another to be considered rich.  It's not the number of toys or cars or houses - only net worth and even that can be parsed when dissected further.  I think the down economy proved that while many appeared rich they were actually huge debtors financing luxuries with unrealized housing gains or fragile paychecks, leaving little in reserve.


Well, to quibble a bit further - The only way I can show you my "Net Worth" is by showing you my toys and motorcycles and house and Other Stuff.

All the rest of it is just paper - statements from brokerage houses and banks, papers "certifying" that I have money put up somewhere (where?), and little green slips with NOTHING behind them other than the fact that the next guy will take them from me in exchange for goods.

So unless we compare paper and see what kind it is, you can't tell by looking WHO I'm borrowing from to buy my toys.   And in the end, it doesn't make a whit of difference what the paper says that I used to buy my "stuff" - if I can buy a $3M beach house and move my stuff into it, who knows or cares whether it's a "credit" transaction or a "cash" transaction?

So if one guy has 10 luxury cars and 3 houses all mortgaged to the hilt and wears Italian silk suits, and has not one dime in the bank, and another guy lives in a shack in raggedy jeans, eating beans and has a million dollars in the bank .... which one's the "rich guy"?

And why does it matter?   ???    ;) 

Lannis
"Hard pounding, this, gentlemen; let's see who pounds the longest".

Offline Oca

  • Gaggle Mentor
  • ****
  • Posts: 582
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #207 on: March 16, 2012, 01:20:54 PM »
When you come to market it's best to sell as many as you can for exposure.  As that happens you can raise prices because there's demand.  At a premium price point that won't happen.  Few sales, low exposure, hard to convince dealers to carry them= hard to stay in business.

Sounds like Moto Guzzi.
Santa Rosa Valley, CA
'06 -- 1100 Breva -- GONE
'12 -- Stelvio NTX 1200 (burnt orange) -- GONE
'14 -- Griso 1200 SE

BigRooster

  • Guest
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #208 on: March 16, 2012, 01:43:32 PM »
Well, to quibble a bit further - The only way I can show you my "Net Worth" is by showing you my toys and motorcycles and house and Other Stuff.

All the rest of it is just paper - statements from brokerage houses and banks, papers "certifying" that I have money put up somewhere (where?), and little green slips with NOTHING behind them other than the fact that the next guy will take them from me in exchange for goods.

So unless we compare paper and see what kind it is, you can't tell by looking WHO I'm borrowing from to buy my toys.   And in the end, it doesn't make a whit of difference what the paper says that I used to buy my "stuff" - if I can buy a $3M beach house and move my stuff into it, who knows or cares whether it's a "credit" transaction or a "cash" transaction?

So if one guy has 10 luxury cars and 3 houses all mortgaged to the hilt and wears Italian silk suits, and has not one dime in the bank, and another guy lives in a shack in raggedy jeans, eating beans and has a million dollars in the bank .... which one's the "rich guy"?

And why does it matter?   ???    ;) 

Lannis
It completly does not matter, semantics to some extent. Im not really sure what my original point was and I guess I really dont have a point other than generally those that may appear the "richest" may actually not be as well off as they appear.

This says is better than I can: http://www.plantingdollars.com/personal-finance/being-rich-versus-being-wealthy/

Being Rich
Rich is a current state of being that can happen overnight. For example: lottery winners, new found celebrities and even high payed professions such as doctors or lawyers belong in the category of rich. They have quite a bit of money, but only have that money because of one source. Becoming rich can happen in an instant, but at the same time it can dissappear in an instant.

Being Wealthy
Wealth is being rich, but being rich through ownership of assets. Wealthy people don’t rely on their job, one particular asset, or even their natural talents. Wealthy people own assets and if you took away their job (if they have one) they wouldn’t be poor. If you took away the income stream from a rich person, they would quickly become poor. There’s a huge difference here
.
 

Offline Lannis

  • Gaggle Hero
  • *****
  • Posts: 26504
  • Location: Central Virginia
Re: Motus merged threadfest
« Reply #209 on: March 16, 2012, 02:27:04 PM »
It completly does not matter, semantics to some extent. Im not really sure what my original point was and I guess I really dont have a point other than generally those that may appear the "richest" may actually not be as well off as they appear.

This says is better than I can: http://www.plantingdollars.com/personal-finance/being-rich-versus-being-wealthy/

Being Rich
Rich is a current state of being that can happen overnight. For example: lottery winners, new found celebrities and even high payed professions such as doctors or lawyers belong in the category of rich. They have quite a bit of money, but only have that money because of one source. Becoming rich can happen in an instant, but at the same time it can dissappear in an instant.

Being Wealthy
Wealth is being rich, but being rich through ownership of assets. Wealthy people don’t rely on their job, one particular asset, or even their natural talents. Wealthy people own assets and if you took away their job (if they have one) they wouldn’t be poor. If you took away the income stream from a rich person, they would quickly become poor. There’s a huge difference here
.
 

Neither of us have to have a point ... It's just a discussion board!     And I think the original question was related to "Rich (or wealthy if you will) compared to WHO?", especially if I was involved!

Good thoughts, though.

Lannis
"Hard pounding, this, gentlemen; let's see who pounds the longest".


NEW WILDGUZZI PRODUCT - Moto Guzzi Door Mat
Receive donation credit with door mat purchase!
Advertise Here
 


NEW WILDGUZZI PRODUCT - Moto Guzzi Door Mat
Receive donation credit with door mat purchase!
Advertise Here