New Moto Guzzi Door Mats Available Now
Could you post the year and serial number of your bike. I have a 2012 and I am wondering if Guzzi had a bad batch of swingarms because this problem seems very rare, but very worrying at the same time.
If the swing arm supports the wheel from one side, and it broke under the rider's and its own weight, why is the tire tipped and turned the way it is? Shouldn't the gearbox side be down? Wouldn't such an accident try to pull the unit apart? The unit looks compressed. It sort of looks more like impact damage to me. YMMV
I'm trying to collect numbers, and have now 1.5 If someone knows how to contact the Australian owner to get me the VIN. I can lookup production date with that. Three bikes out of a few thousand is very litte to draw conclusions. Who has seen the production process in the factory, knows that not all part come and get mounted in a first in first ouit way, it's in batches. If you have a VIn or enginenumber and another that is 10 higher, that doesn't tell you the low number is made earlier. If they are mode then 100 apart, then chances are good that the lower number is made earlier. Engines waiting to be tested in the blue test cabines.
Or preload adjustment. If the preload is not set properly, and the shock is being bottomed out, that might add a lot of impact type stress. I found the spring on the stock 2009 pretty weak when loaded.
Rebound, as one of the forum members PM'd me, can also cause problems. If riding along on a bumpy road with corrugations and rebound damping is set too high compared to compression damping, the spring will pack (basically it doesn't get enough time to expand between loads from the corrugation). The the shock can then easily "bottom out" since the coils will be touching one another at that point, or they might be very close to one another so that effectively you have no more travel on the spring. All the load then goes through the wheel and swing-arm into the frame. Still, one would hope that the swing arm is stronger than the wheel, which clearly was not the case in my failure since the wheel and tyre is still in perfect condition.I've been on rides where guys hit a washout in a gravel road and they bend rims, if that happens you should definitively inspect the suspension and ancillary parts.
Nearly right, sorry, have to say it nowShock will bottom out long before spring coil binds on anything halfway well designedFirst you hit the rubbery bump stop, then that compresses till it can't (very high speed comp damping)Then the load goes somewhere elseMight be problem, might not.
With all this negative discussion around the Stelvio it might be good to inject some positive vibe.50 plus paying homage to the creator.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84taL6pT4og
When you load 500 pounds on a 600 pound motorcycle, your problems started some time before that. Time to rethink what you're doing.
Yes, the bump stop was destroyed on my original shock. Not saying anything about the overloaded rear seat. I had the shock resprung and revalved. Now it never bottom out, and seldom reaches fully extended.
My goal is not trying to make it easier for haters.
I understand that. My feeling is that since all three failures we know about have been on machines from what seems to be a very small window of manufacture there was probably a bad batch of castings. This is particularly worrying because nobody knows how many might be flawed.I'll be writing to our tech and warranty wallahs later today and trying to see if we can shake some action. If we can get some input from the factory on what Vin's might be affected they can be summoned in for, at the very least, an inspection. The last thing I want is people, particularly my customers, being injured or killed.Pete
That is a very considerate and noble thing to do.
OP (Bill?)Is your bump stop intact ?