New Moto Guzzi Door Mats Available Now
Damn my new 06 Baja with a manual was 2 vehicles ago (4 if you count all the ones in the household).Truthfully I kinda miss it. I might still have it if I'd gotten the turbo. But I was in a "try to be more responsible and conservative" phase... That obviously didn't take. [emoji23] Great vehicle though. Tough as nails and rock solid in foul weather.
Here's a shot of mine from a few years back - nothing's changed, though
An auto usually will require less maintenance, the basic design is quite clever and similar to the 3 speed hubs on bicycles, and the torque converter takes a lot of the punishment that kills clutches.
That has not been my experience! Regular fluid and filter changes assuming you don't turn it over every couple of years and let it be the next guys problem, rebuilds are vastly more expensive, if they say ZF !@#$ing run away! Even if you go through two clutches over the life of the vehicle and pay someone else to change them I doubt you'll get anywhere near the cost of an auto.
My experience too! Autos are $$$. Manuals are old school simple.
Generally speaking, most won't have transmission problems in a typical time period the vehicle is owned from new.
I usually keep my cars until about 150k miles. Buy them used.
I understand why they stopped putting manuals in trucks. Nobody reads them.
In my 45 years of driving, I have owned more manuals than automatics. I can only remember one time when 1 time when I had a transmission issue and that was an automatic.It was an 84-85 Accord that I bought for 300 as it wouldn't go into drive. towed it home, change the oil and few times and it worked, but just the first 3 gears, still wouldn't go into 4th, but since my daughter used it around town no biggie.during the summer when she wasn't using it to go to college, I had it rebuilt. Worked fine until I got rear ended and it was totaled about 6 months later. But I made money as the car was worth much more than I had in it.never had a clutch go out on me, had a rear seal leak a couple of times, but that is about it.Still, I prefer manuals, just a preference. I think clutches and autos are much better than they used to be, as I have several cars over 200k without clutch issues. My Saturn and Dodge 2500 both over 300k and neither has had a clutch replaced.However, the wife says the next one will be an auto, she is tired of shifting in stop and go traffic. So......Old Head
I don't have manual tranny issues........it's the clutches that don't last for me when I own the vehicle for a long time and end up having to abuse the clutch in some situation, which wouldn't happen with an auto.
What sort of abuse?
Like 1 time my 16' RV trailer wheel got stuck in a pot hole and to get it out I had to abuse slipping the truck clutch. Not too much later the clutch was worn out prematurely.
I feel your frustration, but the mfg aren't forcing it, the buying public is. The American buyers simply don't want sticks. If they did, the mfg would gladly provide them, all they want to do is sell more units. It's hard to text and steer and shift all at the same time!
Oh; A few years ago it was said to be the need to restrict rapid engine speed changes such as are common with manual transmissions, to make the pollution numbers. Have the manufacturers gotten by that roadblock?