New Moto Guzzi Door Mats Available Now
Pricey stuff!
My reading of the API specifications seems to say that if it is higher alphabetically than the recommended, then you are in good shape. Also, API.org list SG as being obsolete. http://www.api.org/products-and-services/engine-oil/eolcs-categories-and-documents/oil-categories#tab_gasolinejdg
This is the oil my calvins PO used and recommended, anyone else here ever used this oil?
I've used that on my Norge a few times
Draining from mine now.ENI this time, but only because I have that.Bill
I use Motul 7100, have for years. Seems to work great, and smells good too!
I have a feeling this response is more than likely the most accurate post thus far. I have never put more than 30k on any of the dozens of bikes I've owned. The id bet good money that any of those bikes would have made it flawlessly 30k ,simply using straight 30wt Dino non detergent lawnmower grade oil. Heck I've got an old air cooled Briggs and Stratton push mower with 1000 hours on that mention 30 wt Dino oil.
I purchased a case of ENI last year, so I'll be using it for the next 3-4 oil changes
Yeah, why not pass the buck on to the next sucker... #Ethics
I've always used the recommended oil.But I'm beginning to think that we have discussed oil specs more, and really care more about them, than the Guzzi engineers ever did.The Griso 1100 was originally specified for 4T 5W 40 (in the owner's manual) and then respecified to 4T 10W 60 in a bulletin. Then 4T 10W 60 was also specified for the much higher output 1200. Why did the 1100 specification get revised?I think the Guzzi engineers just picked likely specifications out of the Agip product brochure, without much deep thought. For them, after all, the extra expense of the higher grade oil meant absolutely nothing. When the 10W 60 came along, they said, "Sure, wazza matter, why not? We put him in everything, they all be good. Lezza go for espresso!"As for us, let's put him in all our bikes too, and go for espresso. Wazza matter?
The Griso 1100 was originally specified for 4T 5W 40 (in the owner's manual) and then respecified to 4T 10W 60 in a bulletin. Then 4T 10W 60 was also specified for the much higher output 1200. Why did the 1100 specification get revised?
WAS it actually spec'd for 5W-40, or was that a typo, i.e. a careless write of the new manual which blocked and copied from a previous model for some of the content (a very common way these manuals are built)?
From a technical point of view the engine is very similar to the one already installed to the V11.A series of optimisations and improvements of single components have been Implemented.Principal novelties are:• alternator (is explained later in ELETTROMECHANICAL COMPONENTS)• oil circuit with pressure valve and external oil filter• valve retainer with three grooves to allow rotation for even wear of the valve • longer drive shaft (4 mm)• new 1st piston ring with L-shape to reduce blow-by gas• cylinder head and base gasket metallic• sintered valve seats• two spark plugs per cylinder (is explained later in IGNITION COMPONENTS) • new aspect cylinder head covers• new gearbox
I drive (in addition to my B-750) a VW GTI and VW specifies a Euro-Spec synthetic because of sludge build-up and subsequent engine failures of older GTI engines using non synthetics. The only one readily available here locally is Mobil 1 0W-40. In over 105K miles the engine is still clean. This may be a similar thing with the 10W-60 synthetic spec from Guzzi.Jurgen