New Moto Guzzi Door Mats Available Now
I will not be too concern about the belt thought , just inspect it and if the are no cracks , i would just ride it.if the bike was properly stored it should last forever....
If not overtightened, contaminated by oil, or cut by a stone, they should last more than a decade or 100k easily.Oh, btw, on mine I went down a size on the rear tire 150-->140, but up a size on the front 100-->110.
on the reply page lower left, you can use "add image to post" and use a pic right from your computer- no host
Kev - what's the appeal of 2004 - 2006 bikes? I know that '04 was the first year of rubber engine mounts, but what changed with the '07 models?
There's an '05 for sale near me, 4000 miles, $4500 asking price. Thoughts?
Talking to Harley guys it seemd that the belt life is very different for each bike and each rider...
I don't know that I'd say it's very different for each bike, it really depends on 3 things:1. Use - lots of dirt and gravel means you'll pick up a stone at some point, and if not found, eventually a failure.2. Adjustment - too tight is not right.3. Oil/Chemicals - contamination will eventually lead to failure.I think it's way more common that owners never replace a belt, and there are plenty that make it past 100k miles.I do have a little bit of stone damage on my current belt at 30k miles, but no plans to replace it.
Yes on the too tight....On the tube frame Buells the factory belt tightness recommendation leads to early belt and transmission high gear bearing failure...The proper adjustment is quite loose, about two inches easy play on the top run with the rider seated......A Sportster has different swingarm motion than a Buell but the loose belt is better than tight...