Author Topic: Ultimate modification for Loopframe (Read 4003 times)

th_01 · « **on:** February 14, 2018, 03:26:23 PM »

Today I installed a flux capacitor on my Eldorado.

I am hoping the handling won't be effected.

guzzisteve · « **Reply #1 on:** February 14, 2018, 03:34:42 PM »

Wow, that's a jim dandy. It ought to fly & not fry.

th_01 · « **Reply #2 on:** February 14, 2018, 03:42:21 PM »

Now I'm looking for a " Mr Fusion" to round out the mod.

Chuck in Indiana · « **Reply #3 on:** February 14, 2018, 04:06:07 PM »

That's the first time I've seen a flux capacitor used on a loop. It's about time..

Oh, btw.. could you send me back in time a few years? I'd like to do an emendation of a decision or two..

bigbikerrick · « **Reply #4 on:** February 14, 2018, 06:20:28 PM »

That looks dangerous!

Rick.

cruzziguzzi · « **Reply #5 on:** February 14, 2018, 06:54:03 PM »

I dunno Doc...
While I applaud your engine-uity and drive, I have to take issue with your claim of it being the "Ultimate modification..."

Clearly, if you think on it a bit - an oscillation-overthruster is the ULTIMATE mod!

Todd.

oldbike54 · « **Reply #6 on:** February 14, 2018, 07:22:35 PM »

Didn't we discuss this , that positive ground FC won't work , you need the Neg ground version .

Dusty

twowings · « **Reply #7 on:** February 14, 2018, 08:39:21 PM »

Dr. Emmett Brown: [reads the "Save the Clock Tower" flyer and reacts with hope] This is it! This is the answer. It says here that a bolt of lightning is going to strike the clock tower at precisely 10:04 p.m. next Saturday night! If... If we could somehow harness this lightning... channel it into the flux capacitor... it just might work. Next Saturday night, we're sending you back to the future!

rodekyll · « **Reply #8 on:** February 14, 2018, 08:42:07 PM »

Quote from: oldbike54 on February 14, 2018, 07:22:35 PM

Didn't we discuss this , that positive ground FC won't work , you need the Neg ground version .

Dusty

Dusty, you're not paying attention. If you look on the pic, he's rectified it to the field generator. That makes the flux polar-ambiguous. Like the inventor, it needn't be grounded at all! Brilliant!

oldbike54 · « **Reply #9 on:** February 14, 2018, 09:02:22 PM »

Quote from: rodekyll on February 14, 2018, 08:42:07 PM

Dusty, you're not paying attention. If you look on the pic, he's rectified it to the field generator. That makes the flux polar-ambiguous. Like the inventor, it needn't be grounded at all! Brilliant!

Doesn't that only work if he has the proper anti-reversionary dust excluder modification ?

Dusty

rodekyll · « **Reply #10 on:** February 14, 2018, 09:10:02 PM »

Quote from: oldbike54 on February 14, 2018, 09:02:22 PM

Doesn't that only work if he has the proper anti-reversionary dust excluder modification ?

Dusty

If it's in the wind, yes. This one is cleverly engineered into the slipstream. So no model-specific baffles are necessary. No baffles = no reversion factor and therefore no dust.

oldbike54 · « **Reply #11 on:** February 14, 2018, 09:24:08 PM »

Quote from: rodekyll on February 14, 2018, 09:10:02 PM

If it's in the wind, yes. This one is cleverly engineered into the slipstream. So no model-specific baffles are necessary. No baffles = no reversion factor and therefore no dust.

So it works like the "Vacuum cleaner Chaparral" then ?

Dusty

rodekyll · « **Reply #12 on:** February 14, 2018, 10:08:44 PM »

Quote from: oldbike54 on February 14, 2018, 09:24:08 PM

So it works like the "Vacuum cleaner Chaparral" then ?

Dusty

Exactly! It's the latest thing, and our intrepid hero has used it well.

Carlo DeSantis · « **Reply #13 on:** February 15, 2018, 09:25:42 AM »

Come on, Spring!

Best,

Carlo

jrt · « **Reply #14 on:** February 15, 2018, 03:05:00 PM »

Did you have to modify the ambifacient waneshaft to prevent parametric side fumbling?

rodekyll · « **Reply #15 on:** February 15, 2018, 03:19:29 PM »

Quote from: jrt on February 15, 2018, 03:05:00 PM

Did you have to modify the ambifacient waneshaft to prevent parametric side fumbling?

I'm not sure. Is it normally open or normally closed? It needs to be N/O unless it's coarse-threaded.

geodoc · « **Reply #16 on:** February 16, 2018, 02:55:42 AM »

Quote from: jrt on February 15, 2018, 03:05:00 PM

Did you have to modify the ambifacient waneshaft to prevent parametric side fumbling?

Further, more detailed explanation here:

https://youtu.be/Ac7G7xOG2Ag

Bluerobotz · « **Reply #17 on:** February 16, 2018, 05:30:56 AM »

Quote from: oldbike54 on February 14, 2018, 07:22:35 PM

Didn't we discuss this , that positive ground FC won't work , you need the Neg ground version .

Dusty

Sorry, but I must point out that that particuar model is the "Quantum" version, so can be both positive, negative, and both positive-negative and negative-positive all at the same time.

Easy-as, and a real positive, negative, positive-negative and negative-positive upgrade all round, all things considered. Victor Kiam would have bought the company if he weren't deceased!

What was it again? I'm confused now!

tris · « **Reply #18 on:** February 16, 2018, 06:32:50 AM »

You're wasted here - give SpaceX a call, I'm sure they'd love to talk to you

The BFR has become obsolete before it's even flown

Roebling3 · « **Reply #19 on:** February 16, 2018, 01:21:41 PM »

Wait s minute, here. If there is vacuum where is the dirt bag? R3~

Tom · « **Reply #20 on:** February 16, 2018, 01:30:07 PM »

I think for clarification, we should consult this guy.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJIvBeVKoQA

wymple · « **Reply #21 on:** February 17, 2018, 11:19:01 AM »

Quote from: Roebling3 on February 16, 2018, 01:21:41 PM

Wait s minute, here. If there is vacuum where is the dirt bag? R3~

On the seat, connected to the handlebars.

News:

Author Topic: Ultimate modification for Loopframe (Read 4003 times)

oldbike54

twowings

oldbike54

oldbike54