New Moto Guzzi Door Mats Available Now
They haven't built anything in the last 10 years that I find attractive enough to make me spend my hard earned $$.
Be careful what you wish for. Triumph is indeed sucessful. The owner went to the Orient to see how successful companies build motorbikes. He returned to Blighty with a fistful of dollars and a new plan. He built rugged bikes that shared many internal parts throughout the entire range. He then sold them to the Brits, Ozzies and Krauts(those who ride bikes hard) to test them for 5 years before hitting the American shores with well vetted bikes. 10 years in he started his "Classic" line of bikes, the Bonnevilles. He built them in England for 6 or 8 years, then moved production to Thailand. A lot of people are OK with that. A lot don't like it at all. Here is a recent unofficial unscientific poll on Triumphrat.net about it:View Poll Results: Do you care if your Bonneville is made in Thailand?I would would not (knowingly) buy a bike made in Thailand at all. 14 8.24%I would buy a Thai made one but would prefer a UK made one even if it was more expensive. 32 18.82%I would buy a Thai made one but would prefer a UK made one if it was the same cost. 39 22.94%I have no problem if it was made in Thailand. 75 44.12%I would prefer a Thailand made bike. 4 2.35%Thailand? I thought they were made in Taiwan? Are those different? 6 3.53%Voters: 170. You have already voted on this pollQuestion: IF Guzzi found it made good business sense to seek better/cheaper Asian sources of product and labor, would it still be a "proper" Guzzi? If the bike requires the Mandello Tradition to be real does that mean things can not improve?Many pride themselves on being resourceful enough to keep a Guzzi running. How many have thrown in the towel over a Guzzi improperly set up for sale, some niggling problems, or warranty issues? How many have we sent away from this site with the advice "If you are not willing to do ABC, you may not be one of us?" I fear if you want to sell bikes to the modern people today, it had better work out of the box, or be within reach of someone who can fix it.
This the last thing I brought off Guzzi which is coming up on 10 years ago is treated by the current management as an anomaly and they'd really prefer it never existed because people keep asking about it. All the current stuff and up coming releases I have no interest in what so ever as they don't suit how I ride a motorcycle.
Cool, but who *is* making bikes that interest you?
Ok, but I am thinking you are an outlier by the look of what you own. The newest bike in your garage is twenty years old, why would be think you would have a pulse on what will sell?
KTM super Duke GT. Ducati 1200 monster/Multistrada monster has no wind protection multi is ugly, Aprilia is out because their fuel tanks are too small and I have one of their rotax powered machines and I don't think much of it, I don't think much of the local aprilia dealer either. Kawasaki H2 is on interest but I haven't looked into it recently and the local kawasaki dealer has recently closed its doors. A DB11 would be good but simply not playing in that end of the market.
I have no idea why a 175hp motorcycle would be needed for a public road, but then again it seems that the older I get the more I get confused.
...Fact is: we are low priority for the managers in Mandello.
Let's face it, many MG owners are stuck in the past and until MG shakes them loose it isn't going anywhere.
My vote is for a big block retro standard. 1100-1200 cc.Start with the Bellagio chassis. Add V7 bodywork.As for the engine, I'm liking the idea of an 1100cc engine by way of an 850 crank and 1400 top end.
They could assemble office furniture.
MG needs totally new bikes and engines, not rehashed designs. Just the way it is.Let's face it, many MG owners are stuck in the past and until MG shakes them loose it isn't going anywhere.Just go after 7% of the market, not the .007 who want but aren't really going to buy anyway.
Maybe Moto Guzzi needs to hire this guy for a model or two:https://player.vimeo.com/video/140118844http://www.inazumacafe.com/2015/09/the-big-block-by-venier.html
Yes and no. Guzzi needs new bikes, yes. Shaking loose us old f*rts that have clung on all these years, no. Though John Bloor did it your way and then came back for the faithful, Guzzi doesn't have the name recognition of Triumph to start clean sheet. Besides, most of us won't live that long. Or maybe, that's your plan.
The CARC bikes were a huge mistake.
In the time the CARCS can out and adding in their development, MG could have made the leap to a combined liquid/air cooled engine ready for the future while jump starting the present. Sorry but adding a huge oil coller doesn't a liquid cooled bike make, we're kidding ourselves trying to stay relevant.