Author Topic: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER (Read 9537 times)

Spuddy · « **on:** May 21, 2016, 03:58:07 PM »

I haven't much of anything to say. I wonder of anyone is in the same boat.

Spud

oldbike54 · « **Reply #1 on:** May 21, 2016, 04:08:11 PM »

0

ccoli · « **Reply #2 on:** May 21, 2016, 04:14:11 PM »

My wife totally agrees with you.

wrbix · « **Reply #3 on:** May 21, 2016, 04:20:28 PM »

I'm speechless

pebra · « **Reply #4 on:** May 21, 2016, 04:23:04 PM »

Quote from: Spuddy on May 21, 2016, 03:58:07 PM

I haven't much of anything to say. I wonder of anyone is in the same boat.

Spud

I wouldn't hear you well in any case. I'm sure someone is in the same boat.

sidecarnutz · « **Reply #5 on:** May 21, 2016, 05:20:40 PM »

I've always been an opinionated old bastard.

beetle · « **Reply #6 on:** May 21, 2016, 05:27:55 PM »

RayB · « **Reply #7 on:** May 21, 2016, 05:28:39 PM »

Anything I would say could be too much.

Wayne Orwig · « **Reply #8 on:** May 21, 2016, 05:31:28 PM »

I don't believe a word of it.....

Guzzistajohn · « **Reply #9 on:** May 21, 2016, 05:38:37 PM »

Took the words right outa my mouth! Hey that's unsanitary!

twowings · « **Reply #10 on:** May 21, 2016, 06:00:00 PM »

Silence is golden....

slowmover · « **Reply #11 on:** May 21, 2016, 07:00:09 PM »

"Those who say,do not know.Those who know, do not say.-Lao Tzu

samfrank · « **Reply #12 on:** May 21, 2016, 08:16:56 PM »

This thread makes no sense. Get out and ride!

rodekyll · « **Reply #13 on:** May 21, 2016, 08:34:29 PM »

I took the above advice and verified that my Convert does 4850revs @ 80mph. By my math it should approach the rev limiter and the speed of light at about the same moment, in the northern hemisphere. My math also tells me I'd need all the straight road in Kansas to accelerate to the rev limiter. It will not happen here.

It's not nuttin, but it's not really sumptin, either.

lucydad · « **Reply #14 on:** May 21, 2016, 08:58:24 PM »

Spud,

One of my favorite deep meditations is seeking the "nothing". Endlessly healthy for the mind. And peaceful.

Namaste.

The Durango Kid

hoping it is dry enough to ride Sunday

lucian · « **Reply #15 on:** May 21, 2016, 09:07:26 PM »

Quote from: ccoli on May 21, 2016, 04:14:11 PM

My wife totally agrees with you.

Haven't spoken to my wife in six years.

I didn't want to interrupt her.

oldbike54 · « **Reply #16 on:** May 21, 2016, 09:09:30 PM »

Really when one thinks about it , the complete absurdity of existence begins to come in focus . The only true question , why is the normal state not total nothingness

Dusty

lucian · « **Reply #17 on:** May 21, 2016, 09:20:49 PM »

Quote from: oldbike54 on May 21, 2016, 09:09:30 PM

Really when one thinks about it , the complete absurdity of existence begins to come in focus . The only true question , why is the normal state not total nothingness

Dusty

Could you please describe "normal"

oldbike54 · « **Reply #18 on:** May 21, 2016, 09:22:35 PM »

Quote from: lucian on May 21, 2016, 09:20:49 PM

Could you please describe "normal"

A state rarely observed on WG

Dusty

lucian · « **Reply #19 on:** May 21, 2016, 09:25:18 PM »

Quote from: oldbike54 on May 21, 2016, 09:22:35 PM

A state rarely observed on WG

Dusty

Thanks, I think

Arizona Wayne · « **Reply #20 on:** May 21, 2016, 09:29:49 PM »

Quote from: rodekyll on May 21, 2016, 08:34:29 PM

I took the above advice and verified that my Convert does 4850revs @ 80mph. By my math it should approach the rev limiter and the speed of light at about the same moment, in the northern hemisphere. My math also tells me I'd need all the straight road in Kansas to accelerate to the rev limiter. It will not happen here.

It's not nuttin, but it's not really sumptin, either.

Then your rig is undergeared.

Too bad you can't put it in low.

rodekyll · « **Reply #21 on:** May 21, 2016, 10:08:23 PM »

This is the 2-wheeler. I could shift it if I wanted to, but it's a Convert, so it's always in the right gear. If the engine had to go faster to do 80 it would. Shifting only makes it go faster faster for not as fast as not shifting.

I'll submit that last sentence for the NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER competition.

HardAspie · « **Reply #22 on:** May 21, 2016, 10:12:36 PM »

Bleh.

Penderic · « **Reply #23 on:** May 21, 2016, 10:31:33 PM »

That means, gasp, that there is .....

Moto Fugazzi · « **Reply #24 on:** May 22, 2016, 01:47:10 AM »

Don't say anything unless you can improve the silence.
Ken

cruzziguzzi · « **Reply #25 on:** May 22, 2016, 11:16:38 AM »

I wanted to, I really did... Well, that's likely an overstatement.

I was about to, but then thought better of it as many do but don't share. We often have that but seldom discuss it if at all though in point of fact, if it ever really does occur, it just didn't.

When there was one here before, I spoke out against without really saying anything in particular and the anger and vitriol of the silence was deafening though that might have merely been an over interpretation of something that never really passed - if the interpretation was anything more than imagination.

In any case, to offer support of that or anything for that matter might be a fool's errand which is to say; a fool's error and/or a fool's erred end, I dunno.

With respect to not wandering off-topic, it is probably best to quit this here rather than offer up opportunity for tangent sniper's to pick up a thread and run with it.

Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, here I am, stuck in the middle with you!

Todd.

Orange Guzzi · « **Reply #26 on:** May 22, 2016, 11:29:31 AM »

Since it is election season, I will say this, "David Byrnes for President". Giving us a new perspective of life thru music.

Penderic · « **Reply #27 on:** May 22, 2016, 04:15:10 PM »

Sorry!

Since nothing is happening here, I'd thought I'd go for a ride.

cruzziguzzi · « **Reply #28 on:** May 22, 2016, 05:12:01 PM »

"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is. If the--if he--if 'is' means is and never has been, that is not--that is one thing. If it means there is none, that was a completely true statement....Now, if someone had asked me on that day, are you having any kind of sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky, that is, asked me a question in the present tense, I would have said no. And it would have been completely true."

Talk about "no content".

Todd.

Chipmaker · « **Reply #29 on:** May 22, 2016, 09:12:23 PM »

Grandpappy once told me.It was better to remain silent and be thought a fool,than to speek and remove all dought.

News:

Author Topic: NGC, IN FACT, NO CONTENT WHATSOEVER (Read 9537 times)

oldbike54

beetle

twowings

lucydad

oldbike54

oldbike54

HardAspie

Penderic

Orange Guzzi

Penderic

Chipmaker