New Moto Guzzi Door Mats Available Now
Who said it, by the way? Guzzi?Moto
Is there a possibility they used scaled down models, at least to test the basics?GliderJohn
Quote from Testarossa:Is there a possibility they used scaled down models, at least to test the basics?GliderJohn
It's not used because it's too small for the modern behemoths.The modern bikes are big and don't have enough clearance with the inside surface of the tunnel for good/accurate results.That's what they say...
Rumor has it that when the gigantic electric motor that drive the fan are started it causes a brown out in Mandello Maybe they should go back to the Fiat aircraft engine . Dusty
Motorcycles are not like airplanes and ships. On a motorcycle, the rider is part of the shape affecting airflow. You can't get accurate data on any shape -- including a fairing -- without both its upstream and downstream components (that is, the fork and wheel, and the rider/tank/radiator/engine). It may be counterintuitive, but the downstream shape affects what happens further forward. For instance a choke point builds a high-pressure zone ahead of itself, and by eliminating the turbulent zone behind a plate (by filling with a rider, for instance) you reduce drag (and accelerate flow) over the whole body. Moreover, the rider's movements affect airflow over the whole system. Finally, a chief goal of wind-tunnel testing is to improve rider comfort -- which you can't measure with miniature dummies.Thus scale model testing of motorcycles isn't a valid process.
Okaaaaay... so motorcycles need to be tested full size with rider, and the Guzzi wind tunnel is too small? Answer is obvious. Replace it with a bigger one! The advantages would be huge and seeing as how they have done it before, why not?
Well here is the problem . It would cost a lot of money and be of limited use . Computer sims have become the norm John , I don't believe even Honda uses a real wind tunnel . Dusty
Well that's sort of the point I think Dusty. No one is actually using a wind tunnel and here we all are complaining about turbulent and ineffective screens and fairings. But here Guzzi has an actual wind tunnel and can do real world practical testing if they wish. It couldn't hurt their sales if they were to become known for having the best wind protection in the world could it? The one above certainly looks big enough to me, but what would I know about that.
If I strongly shrug my shoulders my helmet becomes very quiet. Otherwise I get a lot of noise that appears to be coming form the sides of the helmet (HJC, Bell and Bilt, all do the same, I using molded ear plugs). Noise is as bad as it was on the Quota but the helmet is not buffeted around like it was on the Quota.Same noise with the MRA screen, or the Givi A770 (and on the other bikes).I've used my hand to try and block air flow near the collar but nothing works like shrugging. Wondering if I should resort to wearing football pads! Or maybe a foam neck brace collar.
Wow, I feel like a neanderthal by just sticking a DART flyscreen on and calling it good. I put them on all my bikes. The work great and make riding a pleasure, look good too.I don't want the antiseptic feeling of perfect dead air in front of me while riding.
Which screen classic or Marlin?
Cut a shield in rough for the Versys. Will be interesting to see.After all this windshield looking, raised the angle on my Cal 1400 and took off the lowers. Terrible! Modified the lowers to put air behind the raised angle shield, but haven't been out. Also on Cal 1400, screen now looks way too wide and big for summer riding. Will make a narrower screen. Might pull it off for summer and get handlebar mount drag fairing or fly screen to keep pressure off. Really a lot of junk bolted onto the touring model!!
Tubulator ??????? Dusty