New Moto Guzzi Door Mats Available Now
Did you buy a Toyota in 2011 ?? It's usually the Toyota owners who go on and on about CR.Investors on the street don't give a damn about a big corporation's product. They only care about stock performance today, and in the future. Sad, but true. They're buying the stock and may not know anything about the company's product. in 1988 a smart guy told me he'd never invest in HD stock (it was trading at $9 and something). Smart guy, huh? Basing a stock buying decision off a Consumer Reports customer satisfaction survey seems wonky to me. But that's just me. And I do understand that there's more than one way to skin a cat.
Back around 2004 I had a small amount of money to put in the market. A friend's father was an investment broker and he recommend HOG. I disagreed as I thought that Harley could not sustain the numbers so I did not buy the stock and glad I did not. You might buy their bike buy would you invest your retirement in their stock?
Red, CR reports (or JD powers) have always been full of homes based on the nature of their samples. They don't quantify whether the complaint is a flaking piece of chrome or a failed oil pump, an intermittent grated grip or failed driveshaft. Did their report at least quantify failures in terms of number by reported mileage?
Kev, I'll quote the article again. It was in my original post. They DID quantify whether the complaint was serious. In fact that was the whole point of the survey." Only about one Yamaha bike in 10 has experienced a major problem or required a serious repair over the past four years, according to the 4,424 motorcycle owners surveyed by CR. In contrast, about one BMW motorcycle in three has suffered from such a complaint -- and one Harley in four.
So we should all be riding Yamahas ? Dusty
How many of the 4400 respondents owned Yamahas ?It would be interesting to know the breakdown of the 4400 respondentsThe total of 4400 respondents giving feedback for the USA motorcycle market really makes me laugh.
Pitt bulls have nothing on some of us Dusty
You are a funny guy.
I am not going on and on about CR.
I have never owned a Toyota
The article was from Motley Fool and they used CR as the source for MC reliability. Motley Fool used CR as source material for the article and CRs finding to discuss HOG's future so it stands to reason that if I was going to use Motley Fool I had to include CR source material otherwise what's the point of me quoting Motley Fool?
Well HOG was trading at $8.33 as recently as 2010 so your friend was not so wrong. HOG peaked with the housing boom and the baby boom and busted with the housing boom. Their stock price is now down 34% in the last 2 years. Toys are the first thing to go when a recession hits. That and eating out.
So you own their bike but would you buy their stock? Is HOG going to continue to grow enough to see stock growth. But Polaris has really tanked in the same time. But they sell more toys than just motorcycles.
I think Harley has managed to prop up their market share but the competition is bitting at their heels. Guzzi isn't going to touch them but with the resurgence of Victory and Indian which was not included in that survey because they were to0 new to the market it remains to be seen how Harley fairs the competition.
From Popular Mechanics, 2012....Harley-Davidson's air-cooled V-Twin remains a stubbornly anachronistic signature of the American motorcycle manufacturer, and its most potent expression comes in the form of the 110 cubic inch (1,803cc) Screamin' Eagle lump currently found in the CVO lineup. Producing 122 lb-ft of torque, this is the most powerful Harley engine to date; as such, an oil cooler can only go so in protecting this puppy from soaring temps.How does Harley keep this mill from melting when mercury hits triple digits? One feature engineered into air-cooled Harley engines is a function called Rear Cylinder Cutout. Because the aft cylinder tends to run warmer since it doesn't benefit from the airflow that hits the front cylinder, RCC seeks to equalize the difference by shutting off fuel and spark to the back cylinder if the engine idles for more than 3 seconds above 288� F. Once the air-only mix drops the combustion chamber temperature to 275� F, normal operation resumes. RCC was introduced in 2008, and was actuated by a cable before the 2009 model year, when throttle-by-wire technology was introduced.
Great reporting...
So what's their definition of serious?And how many miles travelled total on the Yamahas surveyed vs. Harleys vs. BMWs?I see a LOT fewer Yamahas in my travels than either of the other brands and and though Harleys may have their share of garage queens they also have a large number of road warriors similar to BMWs reputation for customers that eat up the miles.
I prefer to think of myself as a border collie.
Regarding HD's parade mode, or RCC, if the rider wants that staggered idle it can be defeated by rolling the twistgrip forward at a stop.
Red, CR reports (or JD powers) have always been full of homes based on the nature of their samples. They don't quantify whether the complaint is a flaking piece of chrome or a failed oil pump, an intermittent grated grip or failed driveshaft. Did their report at least quantify failures in terms of number by reported mileage?That's not to say there may not be a trend of truthfulness to them, but I don't think the reports show the full picture. Certainly not from my experience. George, you haven't established a fact yet or addressed my reports of days to the contrary, nor my recommendations why it's not all about the air stream.Not to mention the "feature" in question is for IDLE ONLY, where there is no airflow. The reason they chose the rear cylinder is simply that's the one closest to the rider. If they put the motor behind the rider then they'd have deactivated the front cylinder for the same reason.Again, science has taught us again and again that you can't simply accept assumptions based on what you think is common sense because reality often includes factors you didn't think of.I would concede only that it is true much of the time and for many circumstances, but that variances in frame design, tuning, and ambient conditions generally mitigate it to a non-issue (a small difference when present) and that it is wrong to assume the rear cylinder temp will always be higher, because it is fact that sometimes it's not. I've seen that with my own eyes and I'm not alone.
I really didn't expect you to concede anything, even when faced with the fact of the matter. And no, the real reason they chose the rear cylinder is because it probably gets 15-20 degrees hotter than the front cylinder when at idle. If the rear is in normal temperature operating range, why shut it down at all? There have been times when the front cylinder is at 275-280 degrees and the rear is at 290. You're going to shut the cylinder that is hot enough to risk engine damage, not the other one. And before you ask where I got my temperature numbers and that I don't have any proof of what I am saying, blah, blah, those numbers came from my experience as a motor officer with knowledge of what traffic duty and parades was doing to my engine. I had more than a few discussions with dealers and even the H-D offices in Milwaukee in the years before they produced 'parade mode' bikes. In those years they recommended the electric cooling fans to prevent engine damage from heat, and they specifically mentioned it was for the rear cylinder especially.
High maintenance.
That must be the "over 800cc streetbike" pie chart.